TNT1 Posted June 16, 2012 Share I suspect his PR machine posted. I wonder, if you send three faxes to the traffic department, after close of business on a Friday, and don't get an immediate response, does that mean you don't have to pay your speeding fine? Spin, spin, spin Good analogy. I think Lance was hoping that his bribe would have been sufficient, and that he'd never have gotten fined. petatodd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted June 16, 2012 Share Saying a lot for someone who doesn't "give a flip" hey SwissVan Actualy thought i was keeping a rather low profile on this but seeing you asked... Yes I've got and have said a lot on it (in the past as I'm sure u recall...). Here's a small puzzle for youPlay ball the player not the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonus Posted June 16, 2012 Share "Play with the players balls?" is that it?? :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agteros Posted June 16, 2012 Share "Play with the players balls?" is that it?? :-)Not quite...."Play with the players balls" not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted June 16, 2012 Share Innnnowwwccceeeeenntt until proven guilty ....I say .... The Hub is the sole judge AND jury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmaccelari Posted June 16, 2012 Share It's amazing how this annual topic flushes out all the self righteous, sanctimonious pr1cks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrackmind Posted June 16, 2012 Share It's amazing how this annual topic flushes out all the self righteous, sanctimonious pr1cks... Welcome! petatodd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted June 18, 2012 Share What's the story behind the USA Cycling release naming four riders - all former USPS members - of ruling themselves out of the Olympics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNT1 Posted June 18, 2012 Share What's the story behind the USA Cycling release naming four riders - all former USPS members - of ruling themselves out of the Olympics?Not much: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/hincapie-leipheimer-vande-velde-zabriskie-opted-out-of-olympics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cav' Posted June 18, 2012 Share Not much: http://www.cyclingne...out-of-olympicsBloody Hell, Hincapie has been to 5 Olympic games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petatodd Posted June 18, 2012 Share Bloody Hell, Hincapie has been to 5 Olympic games!And now the testing has got better he's not willing to take the chance again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cav' Posted June 18, 2012 Share And now the testing has got better he's not willing to take the chance again?lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted June 18, 2012 Share And now the testing has got better he's not willing to take the chance again?Surely he would announce his retirement now instead at the end of the season. Why risk the chance of being caught before retiring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petatodd Posted June 18, 2012 Share Headline in the Telegraph at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9333448/Lance-Armstrong-demands-more-transparency-from-USADA-before-answering-doping-charges.html Lance Armstrong demands more transparency from USADA before answering doping charges Lance Armstrong and his legal team - who are required to reply in writing to the United States Anti-Doping Agency charges of doping by next Thursday - say they don't have enough information on the specific charges as the Doping Agency continues to protect the anonymity of its witnesses. Ironic that that is all the cycling world wants of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyatt Earp Posted June 18, 2012 Share Headline in the Telegraph at http://www.telegraph...ng-charges.html Lance Armstrong demands more transparency from USADA before answering doping charges Lance Armstrong and his legal team - who are required to reply in writing to the United States Anti-Doping Agency charges of doping by next Thursday - say they don't have enough information on the specific charges as the Doping Agency continues to protect the anonymity of its witnesses. Ironic that that is all the cycling world wants of him. So true. But unless they can come forward with more conclusive proof as well as being more transparent, Armstrong's attorneys will have a hey-day with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Fastbastard Mayhem Posted June 18, 2012 Share So true. But unless they can come forward with more conclusive proof as well as being more transparent, Armstrong's attorneys will have a hey-day with this one. It's just sad that he's being prevented from competing based on the hearsay that a number of ex-rivals (or current, as they seem) can produce. Oh, he beat me, but I saw him doing X y & z... yeah. Sorry dude (ex competitor person). You're bitter. Suck it up and go complain somewhere else where you don't look like a complete cnt. Edited June 18, 2012 by cptmayhem Wyatt Earp and Bonus 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now