Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

supersport website says he was withdrawn from the race.

 

but the team says non of the drugs they use contain the stuff - is it "normall" for the team to just "dumb" their riders ?

Posted

supersport website says he was withdrawn from the race.

 

but the team says non of the drugs they use contain the stuff - is it "normall" for the team to just "dumb" their riders ?

 

"We're all a bit devastated but we can't do anything, we can only acknowledge the facts and see what happens. It's up to Fränk himself to find an explanation," Maertens said

Posted (edited)

Sorry if this has been covered already, but why, if the substance does not need a provisional suspension, was Frank withdrawn?

Edited by Tumbleweed
Posted

Sorry if this has been covered already, but why, if the substance does not need a provisional suspension, was Frank withdrawn?

 

that is the real question ..... JB has something to hide ?

Posted
Withdrawal pending investigation???

 

That smacks of a lack of confidence from the team considering that the drug, according to WADA, is "more susceptible to a credible, non-doping explanation".

Posted

Sorry if this has been covered already, but why, if the substance does not need a provisional suspension, was Frank withdrawn?

Her withdrawal has nothing to do with suspected doping, she just can't stand to be away from sister Andrea any longer.

I'm sure the two of them will cuddle on the couch today and watch the tour from a safe distance.

Wimps, both of them.

Posted

why the schleck are people suprized every year when the pro's get cuaght for doping it HAPPENS EVERY YEAR!!!!!!! They should just stop testing these nutters and let them be.

Posted
Her withdrawal has nothing to do with suspected doping, she just can't stand to be away from sister Andrea any longer. I'm sure the two of them will cuddle on the couch today and watch the tour from a safe distance. Wimps, both of them.

 

Shame, does the other sister, Stephanie, not get any of that action?

Posted

Ok my brain is cluster @#$ed the article says

 

"Xipamide, the substance found in Schleck's urine, is not specifically mentioned on WADA's prohibited substance list."

 

So he is in crap for something thats not on the banned substance list? Makes no bloody sense at all.

Posted
Ok my brain is cluster @#$ed the article says "Xipamide, the substance found in Schleck's urine, is not specifically mentioned on WADA's prohibited substance list." So he is in crap for something thats not on the banned substance list? Makes no bloody sense at all.

 

It's a "specified substance"…

Posted

did everyone forget the schleck sister's dad was caught with a van full of banned doping products while doing a late night border crossing a few years back.

 

what did you think it was for? the family horse?

 

where are all those clowns who say "not every pro cyclist dopes"

Posted

Sorry if this has been covered already, but why, if the substance does not need a provisional suspension, was Frank withdrawn?

In UCI's words: To give him time to prepare his defence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout