mp321 Posted October 22, 2012 Share I would like to know why PPA has taken back the league from Cyclelab this season? Cyclelab had a sponsor for the league, Aca Joe, what has happened to this sponsor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriek Posted October 22, 2012 Share I recall Aca Joe saying at the summer prize giving that they will continue...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud PPA Member Posted October 31, 2012 Share The sponsorhip fell through for reason unknown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud PPA Member Posted October 31, 2012 Share Logic / common sense seams to go out the window when riding in a group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bike Mob Posted October 31, 2012 Share Cyclelab wanted PPA to pay them 150 000 to run the league, then CL still collect entries to run at a profit. PPA decided that 150 000 was too much and could run the league themselves without "paying" cyclelab for essentially the same thing. Instead of passing on costs they internalised it to save the racers money. YES there were frills to the Pro Classic, this was a 1st attempt by the PPA, and put on 6 races when in reality there would only have been three. The points calculation was a problem and this is handled by racetec (outsourced) There are options to Title Sponsor the league and we hope these are entertained and provide additional value to the league in summer. Lucky Luke. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bike Mob Posted October 31, 2012 Share in previous seasons PPA were already subsidising the league by 80 000. for 2012 they needed 150 000, then PPA were still providing the facility at no charge to the league, assisting with its function and paying racetec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milky4130 Posted October 31, 2012 Share I have no gripes with either parties running the league except since PPA is now running it I would've expected to see a massive reduction in entry fee, non sponsored riders cannot justify these costs, which leaves us to ride in the seeded groups. Also let the league be made up of 5-7 PPA road races & in addition throw in a hill climb & TT, that's what I would l would like to see for Summer. Lucky Luke. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTB_Roadie Posted October 31, 2012 Share Cyclelab wanted PPA to pay them 150 000 to run the league, then CL still collect entries to run at a profit. PPA decided that 150 000 was too much and could run the league themselves without "paying" cyclelab for essentially the same thing. Instead of passing on costs they internalised it to save the racers money. YES there were frills to the Pro Classic, this was a 1st attempt by the PPA, and put on 6 races when in reality there would only have been three. The points calculation was a problem and this is handled by racetec (outsourced) There are options to Title Sponsor the league and we hope these are entertained and provide additional value to the league in summer. That is crazy, probably for Cycle Lab to atleast make some money to fund their pathetic bike shops...clearly the cyclist interest wernt taken into consideration. I think PPA did a pretty good job, yes the points is delayed, but besides that overall organising of events was pretty well. The calender only has 3 road races in spring, would be cool to get Die Burger onto the list for spring....but besides that it went well... Edited October 31, 2012 by MTB_Roadie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted October 31, 2012 Share The points administration was poor. The racing awesome. The entry fee - eina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bike Mob Posted October 31, 2012 Share The entry fee: PPA make no profit, this is what it costs for marshalls, commisaires, timing, thinkbike, etc etc... especially after PPA added a race when TDW was cancelled, they could have not done so as running it stand alone cost extra money which we as riders did not chip in more for, that was a straight up loss. Timing: I'm sure will be streamlined in future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted October 31, 2012 Share The entry fee: PPA make no profit, this is what it costs for marshalls, commisaires, timing, thinkbike, etc etc... especially after PPA added a race when TDW was cancelled, they could have not done so as running it stand alone cost extra money which we as riders did not chip in more for, that was a straight up loss. Timing: I'm sure will be streamlined in future. Thanx for the behind-the-scenes point of view, Zilla... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubehunter Posted October 31, 2012 Share What's the entry fee for summer league?? Where can I get more details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted October 31, 2012 Share @zilla, Will there be a Summer League?Can you say? I know sponsorship challenges can turn things upside down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuctionLamb Posted October 31, 2012 Share Cyclelab wanted PPA to pay them 150 000 to run the league, then CL still collect entries to run at a profit. PPA decided that 150 000 was too much and could run the league themselves without "paying" cyclelab for essentially the same thing. Instead of passing on costs they internalised it to save the racers money. YES there were frills to the Pro Classic, this was a 1st attempt by the PPA, and put on 6 races when in reality there would only have been three. The points calculation was a problem and this is handled by racetec (outsourced) There are options to Title Sponsor the league and we hope these are entertained and provide additional value to the league in summer. CL wanted 150 000 to run a National Pro Classic series...not for a local league. Just hope MTB_Roadie's LBS is supporting racing in the Western Cape Edited October 31, 2012 by AuctionLamb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baster Brak Posted October 31, 2012 Share League was better orginesed last year, PPA should maintain focus on the fun rides, they are good at that, the requirements for racing is much different though and this should be handled by someone that understands racing, ascthe requirements of a racing snake and that of a fun rider is as far apart as their respective BMI's, maybe they can co sanction some events ut the league portion to be handelled by someone else than PPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubehunter Posted October 31, 2012 Share CL wanted 150 000 to run a National Pro Classic series...not for a local league. Just hope MTB_Roadie's LBS is supporting racing in the Western Cape Why would PPA want to invest into a National series if the overwhelming majority of their member base is in the Western Cape and the events they would want their members to ride in are hosted in this region? Is there a different number for having a local league as this seems to fit the requirement. Either way its beside the point, as I'm still trying to figure out why CL would want that money AND still collect entries. PPA are definitely getting the raw end of the stick then. That makes no fiscal sense. Edited October 31, 2012 by Tubehunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now