Jump to content

Molten Metals vs. Fibers


MaxTBehrens

Recommended Posts

Posted

he down side is the cost and there are but a handful of us skilled artisans left who will work with mag.

How is your mag welding? feel up to repairing some 914 rims for a friend? :)

Posted

Bloody hell what happened to that crank! :eek:

 

As for carbon vs Alloy, go and ride the two and you will immediately feel the difference in stiffness and the response you get out of the bike.

 

Then there is the weight you save. And it looks nice like mentioned above

Posted

Carbon can be repaired. Part of what I do is make products from carbon fibre. The trick is to have an autoclave. I fully agree with the weight issue though, the difference is very slight. If you want the same weight in ally then look for a frame made from the 7000 series alloy. Better still magnesium. Magnesium properties are 2/3 the weight of ally size for size but more than double the strength and rigidity. The down side is the cost and there are but a handful of us skilled artisans left who will work with mag.

 

Scandium frames are probably the lightest aluminium frames on the market. Kona has a few and they are lighter than many carbon frames.

 

Carbon can be repaired, but I don't see the point (besides restoring your expensive bike).The benefits of carbon are the lightness and the way the layering can be done to improve the ride dynamics of the frame. A repair will make it both heavier and will change the ride dynamics due to the layering not being in the same direction as the original. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it will be weak or comprised. But people often claim that the bump absorption qualities of carbon make the ride better. Surely a repair will change that.

 

Moral of the story... Scandium.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout