Jump to content

PJP2013

Members
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PJP2013

  1. Hi, I ruptured mine in May and went through the same things you gong through now.

     

    Only thing can say is do as much rehab and possible and listen to your physio, they will tell you when it's safe to get back on the bike. Everyone is different and also depends on how disciplined/motivated you are in the rehab. 

     

    About that missing calf, it helps to see a biokineticist after you finish the physio, they will help bring it out of hiding.

     

    Good luck and wish you a speedy recovery.

  2. Yeah, was kind of out of my control too, my wife had given birth to our first child a few days before and the Sunday was our first full day at home with him. Living in the South Peninsula there would have been 25 000 + cyclists in between me and her, so we decided it would be best for me to stay at home in case she needed help or support. Suppose one can't expect the Cycle Tour Trust to investigate each no show, but it kind of sucks that I am now being penalised for this.

     

    Oh well, will have to wait for the second round or a substitution I guess....

     

    A few years ago I broke my arm and couldn't ride. I called the "race" office and told them I wouldn't be able to ride and asked what should I do because I wanted to give my number up for substitution and didn't know anyone who wanted it. I got very disinterested response saying I don't need to do anything and they don't want the entry back. I asked if they wanted my name so they could cancel it, they said not necessary.  So don't know how they can penalise people for not pitching when they not bothered by it.

  3. If it is just a good day for riding your bike why do they keep time and why do they do seeding?

     

    Some people race & like to go as fast as they can, some people just want to ride their bike - enough opportunity do it your way without judging the way someone else choose to ride their Argus.

     

    Only exclusion is the wannabe racing snakes at the back of the field who are nuisances to the funriders around them

     

    Not sure where I was judging anybody? My first comment pretty much says the same as you saying. My second is a statement of fact.

     

    Maybe you were judging me?  

  4. Maybe someone need to define "funride"

     

    When did it stop being a race? All the Pro's are part if it racing for prize money.

     

    Last time I checked, no one was called to the podium to collect their prize for winning group a to zzzz. If you want to race, buy a racing licence (and hope you make the index requirement to get a start. Otherwise take it for what it is, a good day out riding you bike.

  5. I wish they would wake up and make it minimum qualifying, I'm so sick of uneducated unfit wallies making it an abortion for riders trying to be competitive, safely !!!! So its a lotto, make them put into cycling first by riding other races ! Qualify dammit !

     

    I think you missing the point, this a timed fun ride. If you there to compete, either race in the licensed cats or work on your own open seeding. Let the rest of the fun riders enjoy their once a year traffic free ride around the peninsula. They make up the biggest number on the day. 

  6. The bulk of the cost is the start venue, finish venue and road closure fees. It is substantially more than R1,75 mil. It would probably make up the bulk of the +-R5 million cost of putting up the event. Double this and the charities get half of what they are getting this year. 

     

    PPA made 4.7 million on this last year, surely they should thrown that option in for free :ph34r:

  7. Hi Jeroen

     

    When going through the ingredient list for Classic and Marathon products, noticed that colourant and flavorants are not specified and that both products use a blend of non nutrative sweeteners, sucrlose and acesulfame-K. 

     

    Why are the colourants and flavourants not specified? and when designing a product for endurance athletes, why use non nutritive sweetners when this adds no value to the performance of the product and is effectively adding additional chemicals into the body?

     

    Thanks

  8. A slow unfit rider will benefit more from a proper diet than a lighter bike. Can't recall at what speed aero becomes more important but its quite low.

     

    I read somewhere, can't remeber where though, that aero becomes more important from about 37.5 km/h + speeds

  9. On paper a 53/11 is a "faster" gear but on the road it's a different story. In reality how many of us can say we grind in 53/11 on regular basis for long time periods? Until recently 53/12 was the "fastest" gear available which is in fact "slower" than a 50/11. So unless you are superman and can push a 53/11 for a long time there is no disadvantage for the compact on the flats and downhills. On a long straight downhill you may lose some top end but nothing a good aero position can't make up for.

     

    I used to be anti compact until I was forced to ride it. Now, don't think will ever go back to standard. I have been using for almost a year and never been dropped due to lack of gears on the flats. I can easily stay with guys riding 53/39 rings and the benefit on the hills is a much bigger advantage.

     

    So imho, unless you superman, a continental pro, or like grinding, compact cranks will be better suited to most other riders.

     

    The interesting thing is that most criticism of compact cranks come from guys that have never ridden them any length of time.

     

    But end of day it's a personal choice, so there is no right or wrong answer only experiences.

  10. Your current setup of compact and 27 is ok if you do a lot of climbing or are unfit. On the flats the 50:11 will put you at a slight disadvantage over a rider on a standard 53 crank.

     

    Imo it comes down to profile and fitness, nothing more. Most riders with 3+ years experience would easily be able to ride a standard 53:39 with a 25:11 for most conditions.

     

    One other thing you need to consider is whether you like to spin or grind. If spinning is your thing, stay on the compact and 27. If you like to grind, go to a standard with a 25 or even a 23

     

    Please explain how a compact would put you at a disadvantage on the flats?

  11. I don't undestand this strava culture and fascination with PBs based on time. To me it means nothing. There are too many variables that affect it. (list too long to go into) It's the same for race times. More important to me is how many people finished in front of me overall and in my age group. That gives the best indictaion on how I am really doing. Also call me old fashioned but I prefer to race someone face to face. Nothing better than dropping someone on a climb or finishing a race in the with the winner fo your start group. As you get older there is always someone to beat out on the road and that's how I define my PB. How did I place compared to that person.

     

    Strava is just a training tool, it does not define you as a cyclist. I still ride with a Cateye, avergae speed and distance is all I need to know.

  12. I'm highly annoyed with Specialized SA, their odd business model and lack of customer service. That said, their products, including their bikes, are excellent. I want to hate them but can't. Go with the Epic

     

    It's all in your head, they do make excellent products but there a few manufacturers out there that do the same and better. There is something funny about that "S Works" tag that hypnotises people into blindly parting with their cash. Hope whoever came up with the tag got a fat bonus, but then again Americans are always the very good at marketing.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout