Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Was also surprised to see he's racing for free.

 

Love the black livery on the FI! Interesting to see them having another cycling sponsor in F1... Suddenly two of them?! (Not counting "Team Alonso"!)

Posted (edited)

Yip, was announced early 2013 and that time Whitmarsh said there will be a big announcement in Dec 2013. Everybody figured it was going to be Telmex due to Perez being there. Not sure who got canned first, but neither Telmex nor Perez will be there this year.

 

Anyway, closer to Dec Whitmarsh came out and said the new title sponsor wil be announced at the launch. But last week it became pretty clear that there is no one as of yet and Neale came out and said they are financially secure without a title sponsor for 2014 so the thinking is McL will race a McL orange F1 car this year before Honda (and according to rumours Sony) arrives in 2015.

 

Read the financial difference between paying for Merc engines this year vs getting Honda for free next plus the extra money Honda will bring is worth $100m a year!

 

No wonder The Ron made a boardroom coup to put himself back in charge as CEO of McL racing. When that news broke he said they will announce team principal in Feb. Rumour has it Ross Brawn has been persuaded by Ron Dennis and Honda to join McL.

 

Either way, looks like Whitmarsh is out or at best will be there for this year. A year McL has already labelled a transition year.

Edited by The Crow
Posted

Wowser, missed that completely. Thanks for the info. Always thought the BAR Honda had a brilliant engine but let down by a poor chassis, McL/Honda might just be the perfect marriage.

I would seem that sponsorship money is getting harder and harder to secure since the booze and fag companies were banned all those years back and with costs rising it's taking it's toll.

 

On a different sport altogether I see the MotoGP Factory Yamaha M1 was recently launched and are again without a title sponsor, even with a certain Mr Rossi still in the picture, albeit for promotional reasons rather than winning expectations these days.

3rd year now I think since Fiat left. Not looking good for motorsport in general at the moment.

Posted (edited)

I find the whole business model ridiculous. 2012 reported spend / staff per team looked like this

 

Red Bull 605 staff $344m

Ferrari 600~ $240m

McLaren 600~ $240m

Mercedes 550 $225m

Lotus 4-500? $190m

Williams 4-500? $145m

Sauber 300 $104m

Force India 300 $100m

Toro Rosso 300 $110m

Caterham 260 $96m

Marussia 175 $105m

 

I find it stupid that a team like Ferrari or Red Bull spend that much more and only manage to go 1.5 - 2 seconds faster than a Marussia. Will we notice those 2 seconds? Nope. I'm with the guys who say they must cut back budgets and with it re-look the business model.

 

Stands are empty at races, because tickets are too expensive and racing has been / were dull. Tickets cost a gazillion bucks, because FOM wants all the money for themselves and CVC. All of it. Sponsors, TV Rights and advertising around the track. Country / track / organiser only gets to keep the ticket fee. Teams want more and more and that money can only come from hosting fees and commercial rights. None of it goes back into grass roots, the event or promoting F1 as a sport.

 

The whole show can be done for a lot cheaper. Somewhere it will implode.

 

I think if budgets were cut back to size teams like Force India and Sauber will give the big teams a serious go on race day - if you look at what they have achieved at a fraction of the cost.

Edited by The Crow
Posted

 

I find it stupid that a team like Ferrari or Red Bull spend that much more and only manage to go 1.5 - 2 seconds faster than a Marussia. Will we notice those 2 seconds? Nope. I'm with the guys who say they must cut back budgets and with it re-look the business model.

 

 

2 seconds in F1 is a huge difference.

If a team is 2 secs off the pace they might as well pack up and go home.

 

I thought that Ferrari had the biggest budget.

Posted

2 seconds in F1 is a huge difference.

 

It is now, but it won't be when everyone is at more or less the same pace. All cars will be slower this year and most track's lap record is still held by 2004 / 2005 cars when tyres were fat and fast and F1 howled to the tune of V10's.

 

There was a time when the second fastest team was 2 seconds off the pace. Everybody closed the gap and we're better off for it.

Posted

Agree with Wizz, 2 sec a lap is a lifetime. Your top 10 are sometimes covered by 1/10th in quali.

 

And... flame suit on... In my my tiny mind a lot of the state of F1's "boredom" is BECAUSE OF all these cost cutting measures and crap that F1. Rules and regs to curb this, that and the other development, for the sake of cutting costs and financial fair play. I mean FFS, I hear this year they're even restricting wind tunnel time! Sorry, but give the guys room, let them develop cars and tracks and let them race. Then we won't have every 2nd car looking almost the same and artificial DRS and KERS overtakes.

 

Hmmm... I think I've just given my age away. :whistling:

 

Oh, and to continue the rant. Just when everybody is on the same playing field, top teams are dicing (or were, untill they changed tyre regs mid-season :cursing: ) and even smaller teams are getting closer, as Crow said... they go and AGAIN change the flippen rules! :eek: Cost savings there was...?! Now everybody has to redevelop and redesign.

 

Sorry, but I really am baffled with goings on of the last couple of years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout