Jump to content

First Tokai MTB AGM


Vince

Recommended Posts

Kandui reiterated what the real problem is. the PR issue is secondary and can be easily fixed,but the real problem is beyond the passive aggressive agitation in this thread.

 

Deon, leave it. Dont fall for the crap again. If they can't read and understand what you, Kandui and others have been saying all along, nothing will change their mind.

Edited by Capricorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 753
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Let's al pause for a moment. Maybe give it till tomorrow before posting again as this thread is now actually getting worse in what seems to have been prophesied by Duane.

 

Hashing and re-hashing is going to get us no where. Countless threads on Shimano vs SRAM to proof that.

 

Listen. Not directed at you Cassie, thanks for the input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey listen guys, it is only expected that I was going to have my say. Of course I waited till relationships with the most important people could be patched, this was in Tokai's best interst.

 

We will all be meeting tomorrow, if I did not get that off my chest, it would have been me with the grudge. Just hope it's not you Johno. Who's it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meurant

 

No. Meurant agreed to it - he did not call it. That was done by the "aggrieved party"

 

There was something along the lines of "if there's any more building in Tokai before the 18th then there'll be trouble"

Edited by cpt armpies mayhem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest OldFlow

Hey listen guys, it is only expected that I was going to have my say. Of course I waited till relationships with the most important people could be patched, this was in Tokai's best interst.

 

We will all be meeting tomorrow, if I did not get that off my chest, it would have been me with the grudge. Just hope it's not you Johno. Who's it?

 

I have no grudge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well whos the guy in charge? Meurant , Deon Mr x? What im getting at is who is this new comittee going to be dealing with. And who is Deons boss? Who does he answer to.Because if he answers to someone then the agreived party could go to that person instead of having a comittee

I mean what is this comittee going to do and who gives them the authority over tokai as opposed to anyone else who wants to build a trail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know im asking a lot of questions here but im just a simple mtber who doesnt understand the subtle nuances of private/state collaborative business

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Meurant agreed to it - he did not call it. That was done by the "aggrieved party"

 

There was something along the lines of "if there's any more building in Tokai before the 18th then there'll be trouble"

 

K@K (Afrikaans for Cr@p) way of putting things.

 

That was not said on this thread if I recall correctly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No. Meurant agreed to it - he did not call it. That was done by the "aggrieved party"

 

There was something along the lines of "if there's any more building in Tokai before the 18th then there'll be trouble"

Eh? Seriously?

Pistols at dawn type trouble?

Because if that, as it seems, indicates a threat Im keen to meet the intellect behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know im asking a lot of questions here but im just a simple mtber who doesnt understand the subtle nuances of private/state collaborative business
Nothing wrong with a good question.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Meurant agreed to it - he did not call it. That was done by the "aggrieved party"

 

There was something along the lines of "if there's any more building in Tokai before the 18th then there'll be trouble"

 

Is that what was really said? and who said it? Where you at the meeting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

K@K (Afrikaans for Cr@p) way of putting things.

 

That was not said on this thread if I recall correctly

 

No, it wasn't. It was said over a telephone conversation between 2 parties. One being Meurant. The other being a member of the "aggrieved party"

 

Someone asked who requested the moratorium. I obliged. Meurant was not the requestor - he was the granter of said moratorium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout