Jump to content

Disappointed in coach Swen Lauer - swenlauer.com


MarcL

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 738
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

20 pages? Is that like your Rouxtjie rule?

Hahahahha, yeah, I learn from the best!

 

I still have something like 400 posts to go to buy a water

bottle from Rouxtjie

Posted

Surely this counts as theft/fraud. If the OP paid by credit card couldn't he get his bank to issue a merchant dispute. It's worked for me before when " goods" (train ticket in America) were not delivered to me but I had paid.

Indeed, there are many avenues, ways and means.
Posted

I think when he explained so nicely that the OP needed to close and take down the thread before he would refund... pretty much put forward his side of the story!!

Posted

I know that I'll never ever be using his services myself.

 

 

 

 

I won't ever be using anyone's training services, but that's besides the point.  He's at the bottom of the list!

Posted

Surely this counts as theft/fraud. If the OP paid by credit card couldn't he get his bank to issue a merchant dispute. It's worked for me before when " goods" (train ticket in America) were not delivered to me but I had paid.

I think the OP might get further with breach of contract under the Consumer Protection Act. Would be hard to prove that Mr Lauer intentionally misled the OP.

 

Although hubber Harryn could give greater clarity on such things.

Posted

I would report him to the UCI and then take him to the small claims court....then he can explain his side of the story to the judge, and OP can invite us all to the court, aka Judge Judy style..

Posted

CPA has been mentioned a few times, I'm surprised the hub CPA expert hasn't weighed in yet

CPA, schmeeePA....

 

This thread's real value has been in exposing this dude to others who might have been taken down the same road.

 

The brand damage far outweighs the 600 euro in cash.

 

Well done to OP for sticking to your guns!

Posted

 

I think the OP might get further with breach of contract under the Consumer Protection Act. Would be hard to prove that Mr Lauer intentionally misled the OP.

Although hubber Harryn could give greater clarity on such things.

 

The CPA, when it comes to contracts, is a tad murky.

 

However, this doesn't seem like a contract at all. It's a simple paid-up-for-services-that-weren't-forthcoming case.    

Posted

 

 

The CPA, when it comes to contracts, is a tad murky.

 

However, this doesn't seem like a contract at all. It's a simple paid-up-for-services-that-weren't-forthcoming case.

I agree that he failed to deliver the service that he should've but I disagree that there wasn't a contract. The OP requested a training plan that was meant to be regulated by Mr Lauer, to which he (Lauer) agreed and in turn provided the OP with a cost therefor which he paid in full. The way I understand SA law this is a contract and Mr Lauer is, imho, in breach because he failed to regulate, monitor and update the OP's training plan for which he was paid.

 

But since I'm not a lawyer, I think we would need a lawyer such as Harryn (by way of example) to weight in on this.

Posted

No need to involve lawyers etc. etc. etc. After this thread, Swen will be coaching tiddly winks to an old age home

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout