nickraws Posted January 10, 2017 Share The time has come to upgrade to a full sus and I'm torn between these two. Please could I have your opinions??? Both are retailing for R45999. Much appreciated! http://cyclelab.com/images/detailed/4/SESTA-COMP-1150x766%5B1%5D.pngThe Silverback has a carbon frame but the components aren't as good as what comes with the Spark. No dropper post, 2x10, no dual remote lockout. However, having a carbon frame allows for the opportunity to upgrade the components down the line. http://cyclelab.com/images/detailed/4/Scott-Spark-940-2017-e1472619134859%5B1%5D.jpgThe Spark has an Alloy frame (bike weight reported at 13.5kg) but has better components. Possibly no need to upgrade components but I'm stuck with the alloy frame. http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii77/cityofgates/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-10%20at%206.09.45%20PM.pngClick on the table above to see a comparison! Thanks again for the help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matchstix Posted January 10, 2017 Share 2 different bikes, the sesta is a race bike, where the spark is more trail oriented. You have to compare sesta with the spark RC. So it also comes down to what you are planning to ride and expect from the bike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickraws Posted January 10, 2017 Share 2 different bikes, the sesta is a race bike, where the spark is more trail oriented. You have to compare sesta with the spark RC.So it also comes down to what you are planning to ride and expect from the bike. Thanks Matchstix! Appreciate the input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth Posted January 10, 2017 Share You don't need the carbon frame unless you are already performing at the top end of your abilities. I would personally go for the better components and more versatile bike (read: the Scott). 10 speed is almost dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket-Boy Posted January 10, 2017 Share 2 different bikes, the sesta is a race bike, where the spark is more trail oriented. You have to compare sesta with the spark RC.So it also comes down to what you are planning to ride and expect from the bike.Exactly what I was going to say, one is a out and out race machine and the other a heavier more playful bike.Personally I would be super torn about this one, I love what Scott have done and think the new spark would be a super fun bike.The Sesta is a particularly special bike though and is amazing value for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runbikeswim Posted January 11, 2017 Share The time has come to upgrade to a full sus and I'm torn between these two. Please could I have your opinions??? Both are retailing for R45999. Much appreciated! http://cyclelab.com/images/detailed/4/SESTA-COMP-1150x766[1.png] The Silverback has a carbon frame but the components aren't as good as what comes with the Spark. No dropper post, 2x10, no dual remote lockout. However, having a carbon frame allows for the opportunity to upgrade the components down the line. http://cyclelab.com/images/detailed/4/Scott-Spark-940-2017-e1472619134859[1.jpg] The Spark has an Alloy frame (bike weight reported at 13.5kg) but has better components. Possibly no need to upgrade components but I'm stuck with the alloy frame. http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii77/cityofgates/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-10%20at%206.09.45%20PM.png Click on the table above to see a comparison! Thanks again for the help! I bought a 2017 spark 940 new 3 weeks ago... paid R40 000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion01 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Sesta's geometry is somewhat outdated, specs (10 speed) outdated - to upgrade to a 1x I think an 11 speed mandatory (do you want to throw more money at parts after an expensive bike acquisition?). Heck the 700mm bar, long stem, general parts list on the Sesta is a bit of a joke, much also yesteryear. The Spark is way more capable and future-proof. How much more does it weigh? No clue. Chances are you won't win races with either so choose the one that's more capable and fun. A headtube angle of 71 deg on the SB can't be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion01 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Note you only mentioned frame and parts not geometry. Riding each of these bikes your will see they are world's apart with different duties in mind. So ride em and see what's more in with your expectations. Twitchy, fast handling:SB / more trail friendly in general but requiring dedication uphill (!): Scott. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickraws Posted January 11, 2017 Share Thanks gents, your advice is well noted and appreciated. I have decided to go with the Scott! See you out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowardSteele Posted January 11, 2017 Share Thanks gents, your advice is well noted and appreciated. I have decided to go with the Scott! See you out there.Congrats enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nox1111 Posted January 12, 2017 Share OK, so now; PHOTOS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter-morgan Posted January 12, 2017 Share If its anything like my Genius 940 I got last year, it is a good buy (I know different bike all together, I just love it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.