Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What you want is to convert those inches into km/h

There are calculators that will do the gear ratios into km/h. I’ve got an app called bike gear that does it on my phone. 
 

 

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
15 minutes ago, DieselnDust said:

Remind me where you ride mostly again?

the gearing should be guide by the terrain.

Northern JHB suburbs mostly. From my place to the Cradle and back is like 110km with 1500m of elevation. Throw in destinations like Haarties and I easily rack up 2000m over 140km. And And I am unit of a cyclist. 

Every now and then I venture to the south of JHB when I feel like a flat route. 

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, The Ouzo said:

What you want is to convert those inches into km/h

There are calculators that will do the gear ratios into km/h. I’ve got an app called bike gear that does it on my phone. 
 

 

Yes the website I used has a similar conversion but to be honest I'm not sure I understand that any better. I know the is a difference between riding at 20km vs 22km at different gears and same cadence. What I lack is perspective in the grand scheme of things in terms of what those differences mean. Does that make any sense? 

Edited by Ncayi
Posted
36 minutes ago, Ncayi said:

Northern JHB suburbs mostly. From my place to the Cradle and back is like 110km with 1500m of elevation. Throw in destinations like Haarties and I easily rack up 2000m over 140km. And And I am unit of a cyclist. 

Every now and then I venture to the south of JHB when I feel like a flat route. 

Ok then I would keep the 52/36 and opt for a bigger cassette at the back, the biggest your derailleur can handle.

a 50/34 will allow you to use the smaller sprockets more but this is going to result in quickly worn chains and sprockets and chainring teeth. I will get expensive and will the spares situation you want maximum drivetrain life. Bigger chainrings and bigger sprockets give more chain wrap and therefore less wear

Posted
2 hours ago, Ncayi said:

Seeing that this is linked to my bike fit story I thought let me just ask it here instead of creating another thread. 

I need some easier gears for the numerous climbs I have to do. I currently have a 52-36 chain ring and a 11-28 cassette. I want to increase my average cadence from 78-83 to 85-90 rpm which I used to manage with 50-34. 

1 hour ago, DieselnDust said:

Remind me where you ride mostly again?

the gearing should be guide by the terrain.

1 hour ago, Ncayi said:

Northern JHB suburbs mostly. From my place to the Cradle and back is like 110km with 1500m of elevation. Throw in destinations like Haarties and I easily rack up 2000m over 140km. And And I am unit of a cyclist

Every now and then I venture to the south of JHB when I feel like a flat route. 

Does "I am unit of a cyclist" imply that you're a heavy? Remind us of your impact on the scale.

You might also want to work on your leg strength to be able to produce more force (torque) at a given cadence. Power = Torque * Cadence (rotational velocity).

It's either the same torque at a high cadence, or a higher torque for the same cadence. That will result in more power, which then translates to a faster speed, or same speed for less effort.

Some gym work, as well as low-cadence high-torque interval training can definitely help you with this. There was a thread where the workout was mentioned. Will try find it and post the link.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Frosty said:

Does "I am unit of a cyclist" imply that you're a heavy? Remind us of your impact on the scale.

Affirmative! I currently weigh 108kg but aiming to shave a lot of that saw a nutritionist to support on that front. So far so good.

 

14 minutes ago, Frosty said:

work on your leg strength

This was pointed out by a Bio I saw so I will be starting with some work at the gym from September but baby steps as I am coming back from a knee injury.

Posted
1 hour ago, DieselnDust said:

Ok then I would keep the 52/36 and opt for a bigger cassette at the back, the biggest your derailleur can handle.

a 50/34 will allow you to use the smaller sprockets more but this is going to result in quickly worn chains and sprockets and chainring teeth. I will get expensive and will the spares situation you want maximum drivetrain life. Bigger chainrings and bigger sprockets give more chain wrap and therefore less wear

Thanks for the feedback and I take your point. When I used a 50-34 in Cape Town the bib would barely last for more than 8 months. But I didn't really link the premature wearing with the size of my crank.

Posted

Give this podcast a listen to, which helps understand that there’s more to a bike fit that just setting your saddle height, fore/aft position, reach, and cleat positions.

As mentioned before, a relationship with the fitter is important

https://podcasts.apple.com/za/podcast/fast-talk/id1490521721?i=1000625538868

A non-Apple link:
https://www.fasttalklabs.com/fast-talk/heres-why-you-cant-have-performance-without-comfort/

Posted
Just now, The Ouzo said:

What is your average cadence at the moment?

what’s it like on the hills ?

coming back from knee problems you don’t want to be grinding low cadence. 
 

Before the injury I was averaging between 78-83.  Post injury I've been managing 80-82. But I want to get to 87-90.

I know it's not just about slapping on a dinner plate and poof problem solved. I will do some cadence drills and strength work as indicated by Frosty.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Ncayi said:

Before the injury I was averaging between 78-83.  Post injury I've been managing 80-82. But I want to get to 87-90.

I know it's not just about slapping on a dinner plate and poof problem solved. I will do some cadence drills and strength work as indicated by Frosty.

Ask your physiotherapist for a recommendation for a strength and conditioning expert; I have one I liaise with who works with school kids. Doing the workouts with the correct technique is extremely important.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/8/2023 at 2:03 PM, Lynskey said:

Bike fit pffffft. Waste. Been to sports science institute and their fitment nearly broke me. Couple grand that was. Spent a day doing full test and adjust. I feel good. Mostly I feel confident some geyser hasn't told me what I am doing wrong. I do about 18000 a year. So that's my take.

Hi Jacques. Nice to meet you. 

I've gone through your posts and it seems you have had a very negative experience with our service. You seem to also have strong opinions about me.

However, I am unable to find any record of you ever having visited us. You are not on our electronic database of fittings. You are not on any of our email records or billing records.

Can you maybe provide some specifics on when you saw me for a fitting? 

If you didn't have a positive outcome, did you provide any feedback regarding your fitting? We generally aim to ensure the client is happy and will gladly re-assess and correct if they experience any problems.

Best wishes,

Jeroen

 

Posted
On 8/11/2023 at 6:06 AM, SwissVan said:

Some people including well educated ones have the people skills of a piranha and sometimes you just need to suck it up to benefit from their knowledge…. You don’t have to socialize with him.

jeroen imo is a you describe him, talking from personal experience when he was still an elite level xco racer back in the 1990’s

 

You're not wrong. I was a very cocky youngster.

Have you spoken to me in the last 15-20 years?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout