Clean-up of CSA /CGC?

[thefool24]

Now - maybe one of you know the ins & outs.

 

 

 

What is happening at CGC? It is of the opinion of some people that the case against the previous secretary will be dropped by the province (the Chairman). Looking at the amounts talked about - why? That is a whole chunk of a budget that could go to a discipline - in my opinion the track possibly since Hector Norris also probably pulled at the shorter end in the whole saga? Who then else is involved that hopes the situation will blow by? Will CSA be able to step in and take control - this is afterall the biggest province and probably income towards CSA?

 

 

 

 

[shaunh]

Interesting first post.

[mallo]

May we know who you are faceless one as fools often cause distruction, always wondered why such persons never reveal themselves

[thefool24]

Strange that some people are more wondering who I am and why I am asking the question - than seeking the answers to questions that is directly involved with the cyclists and the progress of building (but in this case breaking down) the sport?

[Dirty Twin]

May we know who you are faceless one as fools often cause distruction' date=' always wondered why such persons never reveal themselves [/quote']

 

Well said mallo.

 

Sick and tired of all the namless wonders on here.

[thefool24]

Mallo & Dirty Twin - are you not involved with development projects? Should moneys like these not rather have been directed to people like you who could have used it for the transformation of cycling since you are so actively involved? Or should we rather see fraud being covered up everywhere but still (almost)no funding going to your projects?

 

 

[Spud]

Strange that some people are more wondering who I am and why I am asking the question - than seeking the answers to questions that is directly involved with the cyclists and the progress of building (but in this case breaking down) the sport?

Well oh simple one! are you going to remain nameless and faceless? nevertheless tell us more about your topic as us manne by the sea havnt heard about this story yet............takes a while to get down here.

[Speedi]

ok, he's a fool 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

[Canaris]

Great another coward hiding behind secrecy, blurting out what as already been discussed to distraction yesterday,  Hay, fool number 24, if it such a problem to you, why don't you break ranks with your spineless friends and open a case against the previous secretary and the chairman at the local police station. (you seem to have all the facts and evidence, you don't want to be an accomplice as well, do you?)

 

Why don't you find the guy who "exposed" the rifts in MTN cycling team, and have a gossip filled afternoon together.

[Witrot]

Then he has a lot to say for 1st post to stir and then dissipears.....clown

[porky]

.............and so we have another post heading south with incriminations and  attacks because some people wish to attack the personality instead of looking at the question.

 

Who cares who he is, I dont know 99% of the people on this board and my views and opinions wouldnt change one iota if I did, there was a legitimate question asked and the post gos downhill right away because its his 1 st post.

 

Really, did any of us NEVER have a first post............maybe we started on 200.

[Groot Lem]

What if someone doesnt want their ID revealed?

[Canaris]

porky, the last umpteenth "first poster", that "exposed" problems in cycling, did not make it to 200 postings, but disappeared once they had sowed chaos and drove wedges between good friends on the hub.

 

First rule of intelligence:  All sources are F sources (reliability cannot be determined) until they have provided sufficient reports to "prove" their access.  Some here.  I cannot trust a rumour mongerer.

 

Second rule of intelligence:  never trust your sources.  A collaborator is selling out is friends, and will do worse stuff to his enemies.  And he is not your friend.  So what is his hidden agenda.

 

First rule of research:  never use a "unique" source that cannot be accessed by other researchers.  Your findings must be validated by others using the same methodology.

 

That is why this guy is being attacked.  His style sucks.

[Canaris]

What if someone doesnt want their ID revealed?

 

Umh, the hub is an OPEN forum, not an intelligence organisation.

 

THe truth will set you free, unless you are doing something wrong, because then it will send you to jail.

[dirtrider]

WTF why should he reveal his identity if he does not want to , instead of giving meaningfull answers (which I haven't got) we decide to attack him for being anonomous !!!

[Peanut]

 

 

 

 

Peanut2008-08-15 02:34:29