Jump to content

Frosty

Members
  • Posts

    15921
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frosty

  1. Looks like ProCyclingStats shows the confirmed teams with a green tick next to the team name.
  2. You know that feeling... when you want to reveal something special to someone but you know you can't?? Well, that's how I feel right now about this competition and... [to be revealed soon].
  3. MTN-Qhubeka announce their 9-rider lineup... http://bit.ly/1eFB1Or
  4. Wilco Kelderman and Robert Gesink have been named as co-leaders of the LottoNL-Jumbo line-up for the Tour de France, which gets underway in Utrecht on July 4. The Dutch team is the first to announce its roster for the Tour, and the composition of the nine-man roster reflects the mountainous nature of the parcours.
  5. One thing that bothers me, is Orica-GreenEDGE - they have announced a provisional squad of 8 and there is no Daryl on that line-up. I know it's early days but their team looks a little TTT and Stage win (from the break) friendly. Only Michael Matthews as a known sprinter.
  6. Pinot and Bardet were close last year, but what are the chances that the Tour will lose all of the big names (Heads of State as P&P refer to them)?
  7. The provisional start list can be viewed at www.procyclingstats.com. All riders: http://www.procyclingstats.com/race.php?id=149964&c=3;Young riders: http://www.procyclingstats.com/race.php?id=149964&c=6&statistic=sl_ranked_u25.Teams are already listed on page 1. edit: spelling
  8. This white jersey comp may be even more interesting than yellow. Contador was the last to win both the yellow and white in the same year. Could one of the laaities do it?
  9. The young rider competition rules are as follows: d) Young-rider rankingThe young-rider ranking is reserved for ridersborn since 1st January 1990. The daily leaderof this ranking is the highest placed young riderin the general individual time ranking. After thefinal stage, the leader of this ranking is declaredthe winner of the young-rider ranking. Based on the start list, as of today (provisional), here are the qualifying riders:http://www.procyclingstats.com/race.php?id=149964&c=6&statistic=sl_ranked_u25 SAGAN Peter (25y+159)DUMOULIN Tom (24y+235)KWIATKOWSKI Michal (25y+32)PINOT Thibaut (25y+36)BARDET Romain (24y+237)MATTHEWS Michael (24y+281)QUINTANA Nairo (25y+150)ALAPHILIPPE Julian (23y+23)BOUHANNI Nacer (24y+344)DéMARE Arnaud (23y+312)WELLENS Tim (24y+55)COQUARD Bryan (23y+70)DENNIS Rohan (25y+37)BARGUIL Warren (23y+249)YATES Simon (22y+331)MEINTJES Louis (23y+133)KELDERMAN Wilco (24y+101)JUNGELS Bob (22y+285)VAN BAARLE Dylan (23y+44)DURBRIDGE Luke (24y+86)SEPúLVEDA Eduardo (24y+21)BENNETT Sam (24y+261)STUYVEN Jasper (23y+78)YATES Adam (22y+331)REGUIGUI Youcef (25y+176)KONRAD Patrick (23y+264)KUDUS Merhawi (21y+162)PREIDLER Georg (25y+17)BERHANE Natnael (24y+180)BUCHMANN Emanuel (22y+228)
  10. Posted in the other thread... https://community.bikehub.co.za/topic/149936-is-or-is-it-not-open-to-ride-suikerbosrand-nature-reserve/page-6
  11. Thanks 'Dale http://inrng.com/2015/06/selection-dilemmas/#more-25326 from https://community.bikehub.co.za/topic/144285-2015-tour-de-france/?p=2647729 Think the same can be said for this Fantasy competition... he-he!
  12. Frosty

    Rugby...

    Yes, I forgot about the Cats. Good point
  13. Frosty

    Rugby...

    I don’t like the current format of the Super Rugby... for one there are too many teams, too many games and all about TV rights. The fact that the Stormers finished 3rd but were only good enough to get points placing them in 7th would indicate that SA rugby has a problem. What is the better format? I don’t think there is the perfect formula, but having less teams IS a way forward. Sadly TV rights is where the money is, so it means less games = less income. If it were up to me, I'd allocate the best players into 3 teams and let them "Tour" their country as well as playing abroad. They don't have a specific home ground and play at least one game at the major union's stadiums. The money from TV rights are split across the unions and fans get to see every local team as well as some of the oversees teams. Development teams can be set up for each of the 3 teams to pull reserves from. They then play the curtain raiser to the main game - on a similar format to the Super 9. The Kiwis would probably still reign supreme because of the culture they have about rugby in their country, but the game in the southern hemisphere would just get better. Like I said, there is no perfect solution.
  14. I was 85kg in July last year. I'm 77kg now and I am also 1.83m tall. No special diet, just smaller portions, less junk/processed food and 2-3 midweek training sessions and voila... 8kg less. In terms of getting faster, there's more than one way to skin a cat, so while a power meter is the in thing, if you don't know how to analyse the data you're getting an expensive gadget. If you ride in a group/club then find better riders than you and try keep up with them and eventually help with the pace making. I have often pushed a few club members over a short climb, to ensure they can stay with the group on the other side. You push them a little less each time and before you know it they are getting over the climb by themselves.
  15. Revision 2 of the rules has been updated - can be found on page 1 of this thread. This will hopefully be the last update, except for the announcement of the prizes and how to submit your teams. edit: bike o'clock - time to go home
  16. Okay, there will be a slight change to the points for green and polka dot jerseys. Nothing major, but I will update the PDF files on this thread. In the meantime, here are the changes:
  17. The official rules form the Tour is available to download... http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2015/docs/TDF15_Reglement-BD.pdf I need to read through and adjust the scoring on the competition (if necessary) for any of the points on offer for the various categories.
  18. Coming from the souf of Jozi, I'm happy it's a little closer to home.
  19. 138km out south at a rustige pace. Almost all of it was in the small blade. Need more rides like this. Some photos from my fellow club mates:
  20. I'd like to know who stole my holiday bike from my skoon-ma's house yesterday, and if he/she/it is on Strava - that R399 Dion's special was is no more. On a less serious note - I have 1 KOM to my name that I earned. The rest (9) were all created by someone (long) after I originally rode those segments, and some are even downhills.
  21. Q1: On page 3, you give examples for Yellow Jersey and White Jersey points. In this example, on Stage1 Sagan would receive 19.8 Yellow Jersey points and 18.9 White Jersey points. Would this mean that Sagan's points on the Stage would (19.8 + 18.9) = 38.7, os is there a maximum of 19.8 points available for the conbinsation of these two competitions? A1: 38.7 is correct. There are points for both of these categories. ---------------- Q2: On page 8 of the scoring document detailing breakaways, what would be the definition of a peloton on a difficult mountain day where the race is split up all over the road and there is no specific group of riders other than the grupetto of sprinters? For example, on stage 17 last year, Majka and Visconti finished 1st and 2nd from the break, so they clearly would have qualified as riders in the break finishing ahead of the peloton. However, GC riders Nibali and Peraud finished 3rd and 4th ahead of De Marchi and Rolland, who'd also been in the break. In this situation, would De Marchi and Rolland also have been awarded points for finishing ahead of the peloton? What about Rodriguez who finished 31st? A2: The PELOTON is the main group, and usually contains the leader of the race. The BREAKAWAY usually gets away from the PELOTON early, and is usually reported on as a BREAK. However, in your example of stage 17 (http://www.cyclingne...-17/live-report) there was a break of 8, who were then joined by another group to make it 22 riders. All 22 riders in the break would score 10 points for being in the break. Only 2 riders (Majka and Visconti) finished ahead of riders that were not in the break, and would score points for finishing ahead of the peloton (or anyone that was in the peloton). It doesn't matter that Nibali and Peraud finished 3rd and 4th - as they were in the peloton until the ATTACKS started. ATTACKS usually happen towards the end of a stage, and is not considered as a BREAK even if time gaps appear. ---------------- Q3: Finally, for the bonus points for riders in multiple breakaways, would a rider only have had to finish ahead of the peloton once to receive the 2000 points bonus for being in 2 breakaways? A3: To get 2000 points, the rider would have to be in 2 breaks that stay away (both times). Their points would be as follows for being involved in 2 breaks: 10-50 points for being in break 1 (each stage has a different rating, so has varying points);50-1000 points for staying away in break 1 (depending on which stage it is);10-50 ponts for being in break 2;50-1000 points for staying away in break 2;100 BONUS points for being in 2 break aways;2000 BONUS points for staying away in two breaks.------------- Q4: On stage 6 of the Dauphine last week, Nibali, Valverde and others who may be termed GC riders attacked after about 75km and stayed away until the end. Would this scenario have been termed a breakaway, or because the attacks happened on climbs and as far into the stage as they did, would it have been seen as an early GC attack with no breakaway points? What if the Yellow jersey van Garderen and Froome had been with them? A4: This was a difficult stage to call as there was an early break but it was brought back. The Cyclingnews website had a feature called "as it happened" and that is my source for determining the breaks. http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/criterium-du-dauphine-2015/stage-6/live-report So, in this case - Nibali was in a break and you would score points for a break as well as staying away to the finish. If TvG and CF had gone with them at the same time and they got a gap over the peloton then "Yes, breakaway points" for them as well. ---------- Q5: If a player makes a substitution, would they forfeit all "End of the Tour" points that they would have received for the rider they substitute out, and would they receive all of the "End of the Tour" points for the rider they substitute in? For example, if I brought in Froome on the second rest day and he won the Tour, would I receive 100 points for him finishing 1st in the Yellow jersey competition? Likewise, if I brought in the rider that ended up being awarded the Most Agressive prize, would I receive those 500 points? A5: For substitutions - you only score points for riders on your team for the stages they complete. Once replaced, they're out for good and no longer score points. You bring Froome in on rest day 2, but he will only score points from stage 16 onwards including the final points at the end of the Tour, assuming they actually finish the Tour. You need to select your substitutes before the start of the Tour and you can only use these substitutes. Again, you score points based on their performance on each stage. If the rider substituted wins the "Most aggressive overall" then you will get 500 points. ---------- Q6: In the same line of thinking as above, if I were to substitute in a rider who had already survived in one breakaway in the Tour before I substituted him in, and he then survived in another breakaway after I substituted him in, would I receive the extra 2000 bonus points for the rider surviving in 2 breakaways? A6: A substitute rider will not score points for stages before they were brought in, so the second break would count as their first break, as well as the second "surviving in 2 breakaways".
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout