Jump to content

Barry Stuart

Members
  • Posts

    932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Barry Stuart

  1. Absolutely cracking views, Andrew. Adding it to my list…
  2. I think there are going to be a LOT of substitutions this time.
  3. Eeeeeish, haven't braved them yet. Also need to find a wingman to keep an eye on me (or film for YouTube) for the purposes of both holding me accountable to push my hardest or resuscitating me. But my nutrition test went well over the weekend. I was trying to experiment with my calculations for calories in vs calories out and, although it was admittedly a very easy paced run, I feel like I got the eating thing right. If I can feel as good as that on race day I'll be a happy man.
  4. That got me wondering how far back we'd have to go to find a race where no women would have been eligible for a Roche-Kelly. It ends up being 1992. The woman who finished in 10th place there posted a time of 07:39. Interestingly, only the first three women were awarded gold, compared to the top ten men. In 1995 it was increased to five golds and only changed to ten golds in 1998. The Bill Rowan was introduced a year later and the Wally Hayward medal was introduced in 2009, a lot more recently than I thought. There must have been wailing and gnashing of teeth from the purists. Since its introduction ten years ago, 98 men have earned a Wally Hayward and 99 women have earned a silver. Going back 20 years that figure changes to 214 Haywards and 195 women silvers.
  5. Yeah, as with any change there will always be split opinion. I imagine some of the women in Ferret's group have their eye on something higher than silver though. Mia, Vicky and Franci all have the potential for gold.
  6. Sure but the year prior there were 14 Wally Haywards and just 8 women silvers. So in terms of actual results they do seem to match up quite evenly.
  7. But why does it have to be? It's simply a remodelling of the silver for women, based on a historical mark for this race rather than an empirical comparison. Women's times tend to be about 13% more than men over various distances (though this may well reduce in proportion as the distance gets longer and longer). The percentage in this case is comparatively greater but it's accurate for this particular race. The Wally Hayward and the women's silver are the two rarest medals at Comrades so it makes sense from that perspective. Like Andrew said, it doesn't change any other medal. These are simply two new medals. Nobody loses a medal, nobody has the times for their medal extended to make it easier. I imagine the purists were quite angry about the introduction of a Bill Rowan when it happened but there's no doubt it has added to the experience and excitement of Comrades for so many of us. That Mtshali medal is going to create a thrilling finish for anyone hovering around that 10 hour mark. EDIT: Looking at the time differences between men and women winners over the last 3 years, they work out to 13%, 16% and 21%. So the percentage difference is generally higher for Comrades as opposed to distance world records. That may be because distance records have been set on different days at different competitions whereas comparing the winners times from the same year gives a more comparative result.
  8. Look at it this way, they haven't changed any times or made anything easier. They've simply given the women's silver medal a name honouring the first lady to run sub 7:30. Then Robert Mtshali gets some well deserved commemoration in the form of a time medal, which is simply another time incentive much like the introduction of the Bill Rowan, which so many of us mid-packers now covet. The only time adjustment that has been made is the reduction of the qualifying time. So they haven't watered the race down, they've given more runners more goals and made the entry criteria slightly more difficult.
  9. In 2018 there were 10 Wally Haywards and 17 women's silvers. In 2017 there were 8 Wally Haywards and just 5 women's silvers. 2016 was pretty evenly matched at 16 and 17 respectively. So it's fair to say that the Wally Hayward and the women's silver are pretty evenly matched in terms of performance. If they were to change the criteria to sub 7:00, there would be only 2 medals issued in the last 3 years. A far cry from the 34 Wally Haywards over the same time.
  10. I really like the new medals, especially the women's Roche Kelly. A lot of incentive for women currently hovering around the 8 hour mark. I think they've added some additional excitement for runners between the 9 and 11 hour mark as well. All good changes, I think.
  11. Definitely going to mix my carbs. I understand the calorie uptake rate varies from about 250 to 300 per hour depending on exertion so I'm trying to find a good balance between effort, food and just finishing the damn race. Thanks for the 1g/kg/hour formula.
  12. Okay, so it's pretty rudimentary. Just find a hill and hurt yourself? I was wondering if there was any special routine to it, like repeats, etc. Just couldn't find anything clear on the internet. SeaBee, I'm not too worried about it as I don't train to HR. What I'm trying to do is calculating calorie burning and necessary intake for Skyrun, given the limitations of what can be digested at different efforts. To do that, I'm trying to calculate what my average percentage of Max HR will be over the race. It's not something I would ordinarily care about as I tend to run on feel but I know that in-race nutrition is a massive flaw of mine so I'm keen to experiment with it on this particular race.
  13. I know I'm not going to enjoy any of the answers to this but… what is the simplest way of measuring one's max HR? Lots of conflicting answers on the internet. I know there's the rough formula but I'm more interested in a (dreaded) real world test.
  14. Echoed my thoughts. The only reason I'd feel compelled to move to a zero drop is Altras. Last time I checked, their midsole material was the only one that measured more responsive than the Adidas Boost.
  15. Wall of text warning: Both the 235 and the VA3 integrate pretty well with your smartphone (alerts, controlling music on your phone, etc). The 235 is a great running watch with tons of customisability for setting up running workouts and the exact type of information you want during a race. But it is pretty much a dedicated sports watch (which I like as I don't want my watch interrupting the rest of my life). It also works with the Connect IQ store, which is where Garmin adds so much value as there are a ton of great 'apps' and widgets that extend the functionality of the watch. It also has great battery life at around 10 hours, I think. That said, the VA3 does have Garmin Pay, which has already proven its worth with my 645. It's brilliant to be able to pay pretty much anywhere without having your card on you (currently only working with FNB). It also has about 3 hours more battery life during a workout. Like the Garmin 235 it has been software crippled to have a limited number of data screens but it has at least got 3 screens, one more than the 235. The caveat with that is they chose some weird system of forcing you to have the same number of data fields on each of those screens. So if you choose 4 data fields on 1 screen, your 2 remaining screens will also be set up for 4 data fields. I've got no idea why Garmin would do that. It also integrates with Connect IQ and I think it has native navigation, which, if it's anything like that on the 645, is extremely capable for trails and other routes. The 235 can also handle navigation via an app on the Connect IQ store but naturally that's a bit more fiddly. The one thing I don't like is that the VA3 has a touch screen. That might appeal to you, I don't know, but I personally like the simplicity and reliability of button activations when I'm running. It's a pity Garmin cripples their software to create differentiation but that's the nature of capitalism, I suppose. If you're looking for a watch that you can use more outside of running but still does a very capable job during your workouts, the VA3 looks like a good choice.
  16. Good news for Garmin users, I saw FNB has started supporting Garmin Pay so I tested it out on my run today and it worked perfectly. Pretty cool being able to pick up an Energade at the garage on a long run without having to carry cash.
  17. Jess sheds them constantly… then chases me around the house with them. Whenever she does an ultra it's just a matter of days and a few of them start turning black. I don't know whether it's shoes, shape of the feet, toenail length or, well, genetics? I've personally never had a toenail depart me.
  18. Sorry, Dave. Did you pull out at Rockwood? Difficult decision, I'm sure, especially when your head is probably messing with you as well. I saw Franci in tears after injuring her foot just past Mbona. Hugely frustrating to have to accept the race situation and the work that lies ahead but I hope it comes right soon and you're back on track with your goals.
  19. Haha, thanks CBlake. I just showed her your post and her face lit up. It was great fun seconding out there, I turned into Eliud's Overenthusiastic Water Bottle Guy for the day. Such a cool bunch of people, I didn't come across a single runner that wasn't armed with a smile and up for a high five.
  20. Yeah, I think everybody was looking forward to the drinks handovers by the 2nd time we'd seen him.
  21. If any current athlete can do it, it's definitely him. Alongside maybe Dame Ellen MacArthur he must be one of the mentally strongest people in sport. But he does have 11 world beating (other than that one 2nd place) marathon performances behind him already, which is well past the longevity of most other runners.
  22. A great article on Drinks Guy here (Eliud gave him his signed bib afterwards): http://www.letsrun.com/news/2018/09/meet-drinks-guy-fist-pumping-german-gave-eliud-kipchoge-drinks-world-record-marathon/
  23. I think Kipchoge probably ran the best race of his career (must be a horrible thing to consider when you're an athlete; that your PB is no longer in front of you) as an elite marathon runner only averages about seven top level performances but we will surely see the 2 hour mark fall within our lifetime. I think Alex Hutchinson calculated it at 30 years time in the early 2000s but stated that the massive jump that came around through the Breaking 2 project meant an adjustment in those figures.
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout