Jump to content

UCI formally notify Armstrong over title losses


shaper

Recommended Posts

"One of the few titles Armstrong is likely to hold on to is the 1993 World championship he won as a 21 year old, there being no evidence in the USADA report that he was doping at that early stage of his career."

 

Sad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was chatting to a non-cycling mate the other day, trying to explain the Lance story. His one big question was: "How does Lance explain this to his kids?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's fooled the world for so long.. he shouldn't have a problem fooling his family.. lying is so part of his nature that truth is fiction..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With such a bizarre homelife, it wouldn't be surprising to see all five of them on drugs too.

 

http://www.atwisteds...-be-tour-ready/

 

they might have to change this paragraph now...:

 

The fact is, Luke Armstrong has more athletic resources at his disposal then any ten year old athlete in the world. “Look, he’s got Nike, Trek, Oakley and Livestrong behind him,” said Jake Rodriguez at Nike. “And I can tell you, all those Honey Stinger waffles are already having a huge effect.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was chatting to a non-cycling mate the other day, trying to explain the Lance story. His one big question was: "How does Lance explain this to his kids?"

 

I don't really think that's an issue. He's their dad, so he's their hero whether the ASO lists him as a winner or not. "We all know who won those Tours". So will they.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout