Li Mu Bai Posted January 15, 2013 Share OK I promised only one sentence but I am now in "soek and moer" mode. I like your first sentence, very true.We are looking at a much bigger fraud than the one genetic freak who managed to outperform all the other genetically gifted athletes around him that were part of this huge farce. We were entertained, sponsors got their money, countries kept their pride and some managed to brag better than others, the one man that managed the outperform the rest, he is now the victim. And cute little Tyler will make millions with his book, cheats don't publish, let's not forget that little old nugget of forgiveness. Lance is going one better than cute little Tyler, he's making a movie...and what hes getting paid by Oprah for the interview will probably cover all the claims and people he has to pay back, so he has that covered too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyatt Earp Posted January 15, 2013 Share Lance is going one better than cute little Tyler, he's making a movie...and what hes getting paid by Oprah for the interview will probably cover all the claims and people he has to pay back, so he has that covered too... I thinks it's been reported that the dik Antie is not paying him anything, could be wrong. But yes, he will make a movie most likely, and garner much fans through it, even some real haters might admire him, they will vehemently deny that they would ever walk down that road, but it will happen (not referring to any UBBERS here) Bottom line, one little pawn and a Kingdom of big shots still employing squares on the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted January 15, 2013 Share considering LA lied bout doping, could we believe anything he says from here onwards? Won't he just be lying to cover-up and sensationalise his first lie? after all his credibility is so shot that if he says the sky is blue people look up to check.Damned if he does, damned if he does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted January 15, 2013 Share Lance is going one better than cute little Tyler, he's making a movie...and what hes getting paid by Oprah for the interview will probably cover all the claims and people he has to pay back, so he has that covered too...Oprah does not pay guests, she only covers traveling expenses, which in this case LA gets zero as the interview was done at his place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted January 15, 2013 Share Whats fascinating is the call for LA to speak out, now that he is there a mix between ho-hum i'm bored and STFU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted January 15, 2013 Share Oprah does not pay guests, she only covers traveling expenses, which in this case LA gets zero as the interview was done at his place. Apparently it was moved from his place to an Austin hotel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted January 15, 2013 Share Whats fascinating is the call for LA to speak out, now that he is there a mix between ho-hum i'm bored and STFU. I. for one, am quite interested to hear what he has to say. ChUkKy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted January 15, 2013 Share Apparently it was moved from his place to an Austin hotel.I doubt LA is doing cartwheels if Oprah paid for his taxi fare to the venue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted January 15, 2013 Share I doubt LA is doing cartwheels if Oprah paid for his taxi fare to the venue. And no Tom Cruise-style jumping on the couch! scotty 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddy Posted January 15, 2013 Share Don't you think that for once it would be nice to hear the truth from the 'horse's mouth'?? I think it would be wonderful to hear the truth from the 'horse's mouth', however one does not go on the Oprah show because you have a need to tell the truth. You go on the Oprah show to spin your story as part of a media and PR campaign in an environment where the big lies behind your half truths will not be exposed; the facts are subservient to the "emotional truth" of your "confession". You go there in a attempt to re-gain the moral high ground by "apologising" broadly to those who have been "harmed" by you getting caught out, and ignoring those you have truly harmed through your actions. An apology that contains the word "but" is not an expression of remorse, it is a justification. The Oprah show is full of that kind of contrition and LA is a master of the media game. LA may be given absolution, but we will not be given the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Dale Posted January 15, 2013 Share Self-centered personality in a great athlete's body.He just loves and craves all the attention, even if it is negative. Can cycling go on without his confession? Oh yeah. Him and his lawyers are masterful in creating the sensationalism.There's nothing honourable to see here. Bonus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted January 15, 2013 Share To watch or not to watch? Great piece of writing: We apparently have to watch to find out, which is the whole point. The other option is not to watch, because we pretty well have known for a while he didn't do what he did, for as long as he did it, because his granola was better than the other cyclists'. Give option No. 2 careful consideration.http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dwyre-lance-armstrong-20130115,0,5716716.column Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vetseun Posted January 15, 2013 Share he admitted he is a cheat already so why watchI agree, a waste of time. He is a cheat, wont waste my time on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Low Posted January 15, 2013 Share To watch or not to watch? Great piece of writing: We apparently have to watch to find out, which is the whole point. The other option is not to watch, because we pretty well have known for a while he didn't do what he did, for as long as he did it, because his granola was better than the other cyclists'. Give option No. 2 careful consideration.http://www.latimes.c...,5716716.column Yeah but its the "LAtimes" - how biased is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted January 15, 2013 Share I feel a poll coming on Will you be glued to your TV to watch the Oprah Show Yes, i want to hear my hero/idol confess No, i want to watch the Justin Bieber rerun on another channel. Edited January 15, 2013 by scotty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyatt Earp Posted January 15, 2013 Share I feel a poll coming on Will you be glued to your TV to watch the Oprah Show Yes, i want to hear my hero/idol confess No, i want to watch the Justin Bieber rerun on another channel. I am too devastated, I can't eat nor concentrate.I am not sure what to do with myself, at some point I was wishing that I had a small office on the top floors of the Empire State building with a big open window. I am off to counseling to get me sorted quickly before the interview, I will however have some 3D blu-ray porn in the machine in case I can't take it anymore. I must be honest, even just sitting here thinking about it has me sick to my stomach....................how on earth am I going to look upon the countenance of that woman called, Oprah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now