Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Hairy, that looks a little messy. Almost like they are trying too hard.

That additional link setup can't possibly be worth the effort. The links are nearly parrallel, which means no real change in in leverage.

Maybe they can't do the direct link to the rocker because of patent issues.

Posted

Hairy, that looks a little messy. Almost like they are trying too hard.

That additional link setup can't possibly be worth the effort. The links are nearly parrallel, which means no real change in in leverage.

Maybe they can't do the direct link to the rocker because of patent issues.

 

Their reasoning for it was pretty solid, IMO. Retaining short ass chainstays (just 4mm longer than the 26" 140mm knolly) and retaining small bump compliance to rival bikes with 20 - 30mm more travel. By all accounts it just WORKS. And it's part of their charm - it's interesting. Also retains a lot more stiffness in the rear than it would without that second linkage, which is also one of Knolly's trademarks.

 

Read the review - it promises to be a very exciting bike with fantastic potential.

Posted

Hairy, that looks a little messy. Almost like they are trying too hard.

That additional link setup can't possibly be worth the effort. The links are nearly parrallel, which means no real change in in leverage.

Maybe they can't do the direct link to the rocker because of patent issues.

Their reasoning for it was pretty solid, IMO. Retaining short ass chainstays (just 4mm longer than the 26" 140mm knolly) and retaining small bump compliance to rival bikes with 20 - 30mm more travel. By all accounts it just WORKS. And it's part of their charm - it's interesting. Also retains a lot more stiffness in the rear than it would without that second linkage, which is also one of Knolly's trademarks.

 

Read the review - it promises to be a very exciting bike with fantastic potential.

Guys

 

On a technical Level it just looks good :)

Posted

And it works

 

i'm with Noli on this one.

It might be good, but its still UGLY!

...And I dont think I am fast enough to take advantage of all that unsightly tech, so I would rather have a bike that can ride fast (enough), and also enjoy a trouser murmur in the garage whilst admiring its beauty.. :w00t:

Posted

Hahaha, so its ugly and expensive??? :whistling:

i'm with Noli on this one.

It might be good, but its still UGLY!

...And I dont think I am fast enough to take advantage of all that unsightly tech, so I would rather have a bike that can ride fast (enough), and also enjoy a trouser murmur in the garage whilst admiring its beauty.. :w00t:

Gauteng Heathens :P
Posted

Pantograph? Is that like a pie chart of Levi sales?....earth language please Cap.... ;)

Google Bra, Google ....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ph5VPuhO9s
Posted

i was gonna slap you with the google clever stick, but Hairy beat me to it :P

Haha! One of my colleagues kiddies got Google and his swimming goggles confused, so every time they go to swimming classes he asks his mom if she packed in his googles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout