Jump to content

New Zealand - The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.


Wayne Potgieter

Recommended Posts

Yeah, better than my handheld circular saw, for sure.  Else a band saw with a fence.

A jointer would be good to clean up the edges of the beam.

Also need a thicknesser to plane down a lamination for centreboard and rudder.  Thicknesser could clean up the beam prior to ripping.

 

Bandsaw with fence... check!

Jointer... I think I saw one there. Can't recall.

Thicknesser... check! They have 2. One for nice new wood. One for old wood with paint and potential nails in it etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bandsaw with fence... check!

Jointer... I think I saw one there. Can't recall.

Thicknesser... check! They have 2. One for nice new wood. One for old wood with paint and potential nails in it etc.

Sounds great.  Now I just need to get the wood.  I really struggle to get timber here.  In Jhb, you could pop down to Country Woods in Woodmead and they had an amazing range of amazing woods.

 

Here you have a really limited choice, and expensive.  I need Spruce or Oregon Pine - Spruce?  What's that?  Oregon, yeah, we have some, but not in the size/lengths you need.  Might have some in 3 weeks.

 

BBS Timber is my goto here, but it's selection is pretty ordinary to say the least.

 

Might just get some radiata from Bunnings and trim that to size, but Spruce it is not.  And I hate Oregon Pine - hard and splintery.  NZ radiata is amazingly ok.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds great.  Now I just need to get the wood.  I really struggle to get timber here.  In Jhb, you could pop down to Country Woods in Woodmead and they had an amazing range of amazing woods.

 

Here you have a really limited choice, and expensive.  I need Spruce or Oregon Pine - Spruce?  What's that?  Oregon, yeah, we have some, but not in the size/lengths you need.  Might have some in 3 weeks.

 

BBS Timber is my goto here, but it's selection is pretty ordinary to say the least.

 

Might just get some radiata from Bunnings and trim that to size, but Spruce it is not.  And I hate Oregon Pine - hard and splintery.  NZ radiata is amazingly ok.  

 

All my projects have been construction and trim finish, so all my timber has come from Bunnings or Mitre 10.

 

I am however helping a friend build an entertainment unit (damn thing is 2200mm long and taking up tons of space in my garage). He chose gaboon marine ply as the medium. We got the wood from Plyman, just off Lincoln rd and SH16. They seemed to have a small selection of hardwoods and the like so they may be worth a try.

 

At the Men's Shed there is also a pretty decent woodpile. Some of it is free, and another section of it contains nice looking timber, available to purchase by negotiation with the workshop supervisor on duty for the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, The first set of marine ply I got from Plyman - it delaminated, but they replaced it.  Then tried to get BS18001 Marine Ply (or whatever it is) from them but couldn't get a response, so got the current lot from Plytech - it's supposed to be Joubert which is supposed to be top notch but the stuff I've got has such loose grain that sanding it is like rubbing a wet dog's hair backwards. 

 

I've taken to putting a layer of epoxy on to it and sanding that flat.  It's why I'm so glad I got the Festool sander - I'm doing a bunch of sanding I didn't expect to be doing.

 

Why does it have to be so flpn hard?

Access to wood piles is what I need.  Also keeping an eye open for reclaimed builder yards - should be able to get something from those.
 

Edited by davetapson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What sort of tools are you looking for? Will a large tablesaw do?

 

There is another alternative I found to the Men's Shed. It's called The Warren (just off K road).

 

https://www.thewarren.nz/

 

But yeah, seemed a little cramped, and the Shore is more convenient for me.

Strangely enough I know this place. I follow a Youtuber from NZ who has been there a few times and did a tour of the place. Great concept, you can learn skills or you can get on with it and use their equipment for a very reasonable fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, The first set of marine ply I got from Plyman - it delaminated, but they replaced it.  Then tried to get BS18001 Marine Ply (or whatever it is) from them but couldn't get a response, so got the current lot from Plytech - it's supposed to be Joubert which is supposed to be top notch but the stuff I've got has such loose grain that sanding it is like rubbing a wet dog's hair backwards. 

 

I've taken to putting a layer of epoxy on to it and sanding that flat.  It's why I'm so glad I got the Festool sander - I'm doing a bunch of sanding I didn't expect to be doing.

 

Why does it have to be so flpn hard?

 

Access to wood piles is what I need.  Also keeping an eye open for reclaimed builder yards - should be able to get something from those.

 

Perhaps you know about this one, but if not it will save plenty of your precious epoxy...

 

mix your epoxy with meths (methylated spirits back here it's purple) in a 70/30 epoxy/meths mix.

apply to the crappy plywood...it serves the purpose of sanding the boards flat and making it workable offering minor surface penetration.

 

During the final steps of construction your proper epoxy mix (structural mix) will bind properly to the penetrating mix (surface protection) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts on the Greens' proposal to add more taxes for the wealthy?

For those who don't know, the rough idea of the proposal is:

  • 1% tax on net individual wealth over $1,000,000
  • 2% tax on net individual wealth over $2,000,000
  • 2 new higher income tax brackets kicking in at $100,000pa and $150,000pa (currently the highest bracket is 33% which kicks in for income over $70,000pa).

aaaaand go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts on the Greens' proposal to add more taxes for the wealthy?

 

For those who don't know, the rough idea of the proposal is:

  • 1% tax on net individual wealth over $1,000,000
  • 2% tax on net individual wealth over $2,000,000
  • 2 new higher income tax brackets kicking in at $100,000pa and $150,000pa (currently the highest bracket is 33% which kicks in for income over $70,000pa).

aaaaand go!

 

 

The interesting thing is how few tax payers there are (2.6M?) and how few earn reasonable bucks...

 

Excerpt:

 

At the other end of the scale, Inland Revenue data shows that in the year to March last year – the last year for which there is complete data – 203,121 people paid tax on annual income of between $100,000 and $150,000.

Another 55,108 earnt between $150,000 and $200,000 and 44,419 pulled in more than $200,000.

This does not include the very high net wealth individuals with assets of more than $50 million who get their own department at Inland Revenue.

While this tally of six-figure earners adds up to more than 300,000 people, it’s not a large proportion of the roughly 2.6 million people in the labour force.

The bulk of New Zealanders earn between $40,000 and $80,000, as shown in the chart below. So income of $100,000 probably does meet the requirement for “well-off”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interesting to know how much tax come from personal tax vs company tax... and I suppose, the contribution made by VAT, which let's face it, is largely just another personal tax.

Edited by davetapson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts on the Greens' proposal to add more taxes for the wealthy?

 

For those who don't know, the rough idea of the proposal is:

  • 1% tax on net individual wealth over $1,000,000
  • 2% tax on net individual wealth over $2,000,000
  • 2 new higher income tax brackets kicking in at $100,000pa and $150,000pa (currently the highest bracket is 33% which kicks in for income over $70,000pa).

aaaaand go!

 

Disastrous socialism which will encourage indolence and reduce productivity while driving 'the wealthy' away and providing ample work for tax accountants and trust lawyers.

 

The Greens have always been hard socialists first and an environmental party a distant second. This was highly apparent in the Metiria Turei era (though Russel 'give me my flag back' Norman is at least a real environmentalist), and even more so in the Davidson/Shaw era.

 

Oh, and for anyone who says 'yes I think it is a good idea to pay more tax, I am willing to do my part'? You are always welcome to pay the IRD more than it asks of you, so go ahead and lead by example, rather than legislating to force everyone to do what you won't do yourself without coercion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before talking 'taxes for the wealthy', it is crucial to examine what 'the wealthy' means. In the mind of the socialist, 'the wealthy' got that way by exploiting the poor or being a leech on society ('taking more than they should/being greedy').

But look a bit closer. For the vast majority of 'the wealthy' (in parenthesis because the definition is fluid...when I was in my early 20s, someone earning R2000 was rich), they got that way by adding value to society. The more value they add, the more people are willing to hand over their money. Think about, say, Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos. People aren't lining up willingly to give them cash out of exploitation, they are doing so because Billy or Jeffy make their lives easier or better through the products and services they provide. Willing buyer, willing seller, no coercion here.

Seen this way, the wealthy aren't exploiting society, but instead are making society better through the goods and services provided, upon which indeed we all depend for our way of life.

Kick the wealthy out like Idi Amin did with the Indians in Uganda, and what do you have? Redistribution of wealth to the less fortunate? Not really. You have shortages, inefficiency, high prices, privation. Targeting the productive members of society in the interests of 'fairness' (fair to whom?) and 'equality' aren't new ideas. But efforts to solve these 'problems' have depressingly consistent outcomes. 

That incorrigible racist Winston Churchill probably said it best: "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

And of course, as Margaret Thatcher famously said in Parliament years ago, socialists "Would rather that the poor were poorer, provided that the rich were less rich. ... ... Yes, he would rather have the poor poorer, provided that the rich were less rich."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts on the Greens' proposal to add more taxes for the wealthy?

 

For those who don't know, the rough idea of the proposal is:

  • 1% tax on net individual wealth over $1,000,000
  • 2% tax on net individual wealth over $2,000,000
  • 2 new higher income tax brackets kicking in at $100,000pa and $150,000pa (currently the highest bracket is 33% which kicks in for income over $70,000pa).

aaaaand go!

 

Income tax is one thing. A wealth tax, especially one at that kicks in at that relatively low level, is a whole different kettle of fish.

 

Let's say you work your whole life, finally pay off your Auckland house worth $1M at age 50, so you just qualify for the wealth tax. If you live to 90, you need to find spare cash to the order of $400 K to pay in tax in order to have retained that asset and pass it on to your kids. That's a hefty inheritance tax. 

 

In any event, the really wealthy will just structure their accounts so that on paper they are only worth $999 k at any one time (or some flavour thereof, ala Dave King). The only people who will benefit are the tax accountants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Income tax is one thing. A wealth tax, especially one at that kicks in at that relatively low level, is a whole different kettle of fish.

 

Let's say you work your whole life, finally pay off your Auckland house worth $1M at age 50, so you just qualify for the wealth tax. If you live to 90, you need to find spare cash to the order of $400 K to pay in tax in order to have retained that asset and pass it on to your kids. That's a hefty inheritance tax. 

 

In any event, the really wealthy will just structure their accounts so that on paper they are only worth $999 k at any one time (or some flavour thereof, ala Dave King). The only people who will benefit are the tax accountants.

 

Yep. Put another way, wealth is what is left over after the living daylights was taxed on income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First world problems...

 

Chorus fibre ONT relocation costs... ouch!

 

I recently renovated my TV area and had to move the Chorus ONT. I did so muself as it only had to move 30cm away. It worked fine for a day, then bombed out. Chorus was there within hours (even during lockdown) and had it up and running in 15min. Win!

But now I'm moving on to renovating the area that I relocated the ONT to. Now it needs to be moved further (like halfway across the house) and this time there is a cost involved. $199. Yikes!

 

There is ample fibre under the house. I'm moving it towards the entry point (so less line needed), and it should take them about 30min max. But yeah, I guess the hefty 200 buck-a-roos is a first world problem.

 

Just wondered if anyone else had dealt with Chorus on this before.

 

*Apologies in advance to all the Aussies on this thread. You guys don't get proper fibre, only that bastardised and slow NBN nonsense  :ph34r:  :lol:...

 

...just take comfort in the fact that here in the South Eastern State we get reamed on EVERYTHING else compared to you guys  :mellow: 

Edited by patches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First world problems...

 

Chorus fibre ONT relocation costs... ouch!

 

I recently renovated my TV area and had to move the Chorus ONT. I did so muself as it only had to move 30cm away. It worked fine for a day, then bombed out. Chorus was there within hours (even during lockdown) and had it up and running in 15min. Win!

 

But now I'm moving on to renovating the area that I relocated the ONT to. Now it needs to be moved further (like halfway across the house) and this time there is a cost involved. $199. Yikes!

 

There is ample fibre under the house. I'm moving it towards the entry point (so less line needed), and it should take them about 30min max. But yeah, I guess the hefty 200 buck-a-roos is a first world problem.

 

Just wondered if anyone else had dealt with Chorus on this before.

 

*Apologies in advance to all the Aussies on this thread. You guys don't get proper fibre, only that bastardised and slow NBN nonsense  :ph34r:  :lol:...

 

...just take comfort in the fact that here in the South Eastern State we get reamed on EVERYTHING else compared to you guys  :mellow:

 

I wonder where you might find 200 bucks ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout