Vetseun Posted January 6, 2011 Share I started a new program, yesterday I had to do an interval session. Had to be @ 80% of max heart rate. Problem is at 80% of my calculated heart rate I was cruising.Intervals should hurt, this was a joke. Could have stayed in that zone for hours. I used the 220 minus your age calculation to determine my max, I now seriously doubt if it is accurate. Some opinions would be greatly appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
River Rat Posted January 6, 2011 Share Sorry what was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted January 6, 2011 Share Depends, for basic endurance...80% is right, but for threshold endurance intervals(to increase aerobic capacity )....you are off What interval type were you doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfreekduSoet Posted January 6, 2011 Share If you have to guesstimate a max hr, there is another formula... MaxHR = 208 - Age * 0.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
River Rat Posted January 6, 2011 Share Here's another one: New Mathematical Formula Age/Weight Predicted Maximum Heart RateMales: 210 minus 1/2 your age minus 5% of your body weight + 4 Females: 210 minus - 1/2 your age minus 1% of your body weight + 0 Let me give you an example. I am 50 years old and weight 130 pounds. My arithmetic formula then would be as follows: 210 - 25 (50% x 50 years) minus 1.3 + 0 (female) = Max HR of 183 bpm That's fairly close (within 10 beats) of my actually tested maximum heart rate which is 193 bpm. If you ever go to an athletic club or gym and see the Max HR charts you have to be cautious. They aren't very accurate. Maximum heart rate is genetically determined, it simply isn't going to decrease according to those charts. A few tips about Max HR which you may be curious about. It's altitude sensitive and increases as you go higher and it also is affected by drugs such as beta blocks and even antihistamines. It cannot be increased by training and a high Max HR does not predict better performance. Extract from http://www.howtobefit.com/five-heart-rate-zones.htm Edited January 6, 2011 by River Rat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vetseun Posted January 6, 2011 Share Pyramid, 1 min at 80% 1 min rest, 2 min at 80%, 1 min rest 3 min at 80% then recover. I have always always owned a HR Monitor but have never approached training with it. Our cycling coach used to moer us with a cane he didnt believe in HR training, but thats probably why he died of old age.Depends, for basic endurance...80% is right, but for threshold endurance intervals(to increase aerobic capacity )....you are off What interval type were you doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vetseun Posted January 6, 2011 Share Brilliant thanksHere's another one: New Mathematical Formula Age/Weight Predicted Maximum Heart RateMales: 210 minus 1/2 your age minus 5% of your body weight + 4 Females: 210 minus - 1/2 your age minus 1% of your body weight + 0 Let me give you an example. I am 50 years old and weight 130 pounds. My arithmetic formula then would be as follows: 210 - 25 (50% x 50 years) minus 1.3 + 0 (female) = Max HR of 183 bpm That's fairly close (within 10 beats) of my actually tested maximum heart rate which is 193 bpm. If you ever go to an athletic club or gym and see the Max HR charts you have to be cautious. They aren't very accurate. Maximum heart rate is genetically determined, it simply isn't going to decrease according to those charts. A few tips about Max HR which you may be curious about. It's altitude sensitive and increases as you go higher and it also is affected by drugs such as beta blocks and even antihistamines. It cannot be increased by training and a high Max HR does not predict better performance. Extract from http://www.howtobefit.com/five-heart-rate-zones.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaBee Posted January 6, 2011 Share Age-based formulas (whichever one you use) are useless. My max according to that lies somewhere in my upper zone 3 for my measured max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guy in Pink Posted January 6, 2011 Share I started a new program, yesterday I had to do an interval session. Had to be @ 80% of max heart rate. Problem is at 80% of my calculated heart rate I was cruising.Intervals should hurt, this was a joke. Could have stayed in that zone for hours. I used the 220 minus your age calculation to determine my max, I now seriously doubt if it is accurate. Some opinions would be greatly appreciatedThe formula 220 - age is OK for those who have lead sedantary lives. I was tested at Crown mines Human Research lab in 1970 Max HR then 188bpmTo day I still get over 180Bpm in training if the motivation is right and 190bpm in races.So in 40 years my max has stayed much the same. But then I have trained for most of those years. If you use it you don't lose it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted January 6, 2011 Share Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..... At the risk of repeating what may have already been said. DETERMINING MAX HR FROM A FORMULA CAN BE INACCURATE. TO BE 100% SURE YOU SHOULD DETERMINE YOUR MAX HR YOU SHOULD DO A MAX HR TEST. Or you could do LT test and base your training zones around that, this method is a little less stressful on your gaskets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted January 6, 2011 Share Pyramid, 1 min at 80% 1 min rest, 2 min at 80%, 1 min rest 3 min at 80% then recover. I have always always owned a HR Monitor but have never approached training with it. Our cycling coach used to moer us with a cane he didnt believe in HR training, but thats probably why he died of old age.I normally do pyramids for threshold endurance intervals(85-89% of max), then you cough copper blood...trust me The HR level you are doing there = basic endurance, and yes it should feel like you are cruising(75-85% of max) And then i also do overload endurance and lactate production intervals(90-100%) which is where i want to slip into a coma but that's another story Edited January 6, 2011 by rouxtjie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosborne Posted January 6, 2011 Share Bloody Agent that 80% thing seems a bit dodge- that would make my heart rate far too low as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinnekop Posted January 6, 2011 Share Agree with all above.Age rated is crap. Go test yourself.....do some searches and have a look at how to determine your MaxHR yourself! Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted January 6, 2011 Share I dont think there is anything wrong with your max hr calculation, dont expect to train aerobic capacity at 80%, you looking at between 85 and 89%...that is where the fun starts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vetseun Posted January 6, 2011 Share Now that sounds einaI dont think there is anything wrong with your max hr calculation, dont expect to train aerobic capacity at 80%, you looking at between 85 and 89%...that is where the fun starts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTB_Roadie Posted January 6, 2011 Share I been told by some elites....how you determine your max Heartrate, you cycle as fast as possible up a steep climb till you can't anymore, at that moment you stop....then that is your max Heart Rate.... Formulas don't work, according to cualculations mine is around 193...i can go way over if I push myself hard up a hill or a sprint Edited January 6, 2011 by MTB_Roadie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now