I'm almost afraid to restart this thread, but I reckon I should add this. I had a cup of coffee and a bit of a catchup with Meurant this morning. I raised my concerns regarding parts of the trail being dumbed down and he adressed every specific area that I mentioned getting down to specifics as to why it was done. What it basically boils down to is that in most cases the work being done was to prevent errosion and keep the trails looking neat. Those weren't his exact words, but my interpretation. As he pointed out, when the environmental managers walk up the trail and see a tech section with 4 different lines through it, it looks a mess. For this reason, some areas were neatened up. I can understand this becoming a problem specifically on the DH and technical trails seeing as these obstacles naturally will develop several lines. Do I like it...? No....not really.....I love the technical lines. But at the same time, the powers that be need to be satisfied that the trails are kept in good condition and errosion prevented because if they're not happy, we'll lose our trails all together. So, for the privilege of riding at Tokai forest, I for one am prepared to forsake some nice sections in order to keep the forest open in the long run. W.R.T. the bridge in question, he pointed out as some others have, that the trail was originally constructed as a green route to allow easy access to singletrck for beginner riders at the bottom of the mountain. As such all parts of the route HAVE to fit within the green rating. I reckon if the landowners wanted a harder route, they would've never built it there to begin with. Also, to be honest, there are many sections at Tokai that give me far more pleasure to ride than that single river crossing. So again, is it really that big a deal to sacrifice it for the sake of the greater good? I think not. As for certain comments made about our rights to the forest because we pay to ride there, he raised some very thought-provoking ideas(for me anyway). Here are my thoughts on this....not Meurant's We're paying R20 per ride(or annual Wildcard fees) to ride there. These fees go to an organisation that doesn't make a profit. Noone is putting this money into their pockets. Of all the parks in SA there are in fact very, very few that actually make money. Most of them from a business point of view, run at a loss. In other words, the government is subsidising our recreational activities. Perhaps we need to rethink how we see our usage of these areas. In a first world country things might be different, but in a country where there are far more pressing needs, do we really have the right to insist on our rights to these areas...? I'm not saying it's not our right, because as citizens the natural spoils of this country are ours to be enjoyed. But perhaps it would be better to view it as a privilege and be a bit more thankful that we can still use them at all...?