SwissVan Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Again, Lance better look out. You can get banned based on association and someone else's word. Ooeer!! Should i be worried
Sean32 Posted February 9, 2012 Author Posted February 9, 2012 umm what exactly was the offence? His implication in Operacion Puerto and links to Dr Fuentes.
fandacious Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 His implication in Operacion Puerto and links to Dr Fuentes. better lock up most of the pro peloton then....
TNT1 Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 better lock up most of the pro peloton then.... And old Basso's dog. And his sister.
GrumpyOldGuy Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Reminds me of the zoo keeper locking the cage after the [insert animal of your choice] has escaped. Yeah, but its easy tackling soft targets and suggesting how tough you are. Jan never even contested one action, he never even said "Hay, lets chat about this" he is retired, he has other issues in his day, most everyone has forgotten him and what is the win here for the UCI or WADA or anyone?
Crash Gordon Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Ah, well, I'm sure the ban will put a dent in his retirement. I see they're annulling all his results from 2005 to 2007. Did he even have any results from then to be annulled?They all doped. He was just unlucky Still one of the fastest riders ever (and biggest legs)
TNT1 Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 And old Basso's dog. And his sister. Actually on second thought, I'll take care of his sister...
Crash Gordon Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Dig the dog eat any steak? Test it too...
BigGuy Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 I guess no more cycling coverage on german TV. Ever.
Lucky Luke. Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 well everyone did now - his results have been nullified most people beat at the time as well - I think he did a 4.30 or something.
Lucky Luke. Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 (edited) “Given the volume, consistency and probative value of the evidence presented by the UCI, and the failure of Jan Ullrich to raise any doubt about the veracity of reliability of such evidence, this Panel came to the conclusion that Jan Ullrich engaged at least in blood doping in violation of Article 15.2 of the UCI Anti-Doping rules,” the court said. So everyone who ever beat Lance is getting the full wrath of the UCI. Even the guys who have had their feet up for 7 years. Pretty farking weird Edited February 9, 2012 by Lucky Luke.
fandacious Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 most people beat at the time as well - I think he did a 4.30 or something. I know. but now everyone beat him
fandacious Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 So everyone who ever beat Lance is getting the full wrath of the UCI. Even the guys who have had their feet up for 7 years. Pretty farking weird hence my comment earlier... "very strange timing on these events"
andydude Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Ullrich 2005 Tour de France 3rd place overall Tour de Suisse 3rd place overall Winner stage 2 Deutschland Tour: 2nd place overall Winner stage 8 2006 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Jersey_yellow.svg/20px-Jersey_yellow.svg.png Winner Tour de Suisse Winner stage 9 Giro d'Italia Winner stage 11 (ITT)
Wyatt Earp Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 (edited) Let's just ban the most earned second place winner for two years, whilst he is in retirement then we give a Spanish knob an 8 month ban. Edited February 9, 2012 by Dangle
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now