Jump to content

Do we really need long travel bikes in SA?


T-Bob

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Here you go, OP: 

 

140mm back and front; 66,5° head angle; 74° seat angle and 437mm chainstays.

 

http://www.commencal-store.co.uk/Files/98790/Img/02/17METATROYE_680.jpg

 

Edit: And Boost back and front and metric shock sizing!

 

This would probably be the style of bike I'd go for if I was buying. Med travel, good geometry.

 

The suspension has become so capable and tune-able that I really don't think you need much more than 140 mm for most local trails.

Posted

This would probably be the style of bike I'd go for if I was buying. Med travel, good geometry.

 

The suspension has become so capable and tune-able that I really don't think you need much more than 140 mm for most local trails.

I think one of the things that marked the capability increase was the move to 34/35mm stanchions on the standard forks, from what were previously specced as 32mm

Posted

Here is a spanner to throw in the works: Dual Position Air, Talas, geometry adjustment.

 

Also have you noticed how some bikes are being over forked now?

Some up to 30mm more than in the rear. It seemed absurd at first glance but when you think about how slack they making bikes these days it kind of makes sense.

Posted

I've been thinking about how much travel I need for the next bike for the longest time. 

I was dead set on this one. The Kona Process 134. Then I realized that I didn't have any money. Which I probably should have considered before I deciding that I wanted a new bike.

 

Droo mentioned that he found the 110 in the rear of the Phantom over enough and that he just could not get it to bottom out on the rough stuff. It has bigger wheels though so theres that too.

 

The Process and the Transition Patrol were initially at the top of my list... and I love my bike so actually didn't need a list to start with! Then I had that same discussion with 'Droo and Savage and that approach got flipped on it's head.

 

Look I like to search out drops, hits, pop off stuff and generally I want to have fun and act like a stoopid kid building stuff and seeing how fast and how far until you land on your face before getting up with a grin and doing it all again! You won't find me doing more miles than i need to get to the top and come down, around and down again... and again. 

 

So I've always been in the longer trail, mini DH camp. As many have said here the lines are blurring and the fact that great, dialled geo teamed with more progressive / better sus' / stiffer forks is making bikes down to 110 / 115mm rear super capable in most situations (usually with large volume cans) and that's traditionally Anthem / XC Territory. Guess the biggest thing now is not what you've got, it's what you're doing with it.  

 

 

Posted

Most peeps buys long travel bikes to show off anyways. They don't have the scars to prove the proper use of their rig.  :whistling:

 

I love XCO, which is why I have an XCO rig. Do I have the lungs for XCO? No way, but I love riding switchback climbs with my rig.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout