Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, DieselnDust said:

That is correct. It offers a smaller frontal area with hands on hoods and forearms parallel to the ground. However it is more energy intensive without forearm supports.

with the bars higher and a longer reach the hands in drops position can deliver similar frontal area to low bars with hands on hoods.

But slammed bars / stem look faster in the parking lot ... so it must be faster :P

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
17 hours ago, Andreas_187 said:

I tried those bars years ago, the transition part from the round hood bar to the flat bar is very uncomfortable 

I found the same thing. Had them on for one ride and then sold them.

Posted

I also thought the question related to comfort, not aero gains.

This old picture of seconds saved over a 48min 40km TT comes to mind. It illustrates how miniscule the aero effect of aero bars would be... 
Of the 17 seconds (0.6%) saved by the frame, what fraction would be thanks to the bars? 

For non elite riders who don't crack a 40K in under 50mins, the aero gains would be even less.

The "aerobars" in the picture is due to the different riding position (forearms parallel to the ground, as mentioned above), and not the profile of the tubing.

Exact numbers would differ, but the principle stands.

Source: https://velo.outsideonline.com/2010/04/biggest-bang-for-your-buck-in-time-trial-equipment/
5cf24d81db2dcd30cc56b4bf89bbf98aa53c3165.jpeg 

Posted
23 minutes ago, JayLow said:

I also thought the question related to comfort, not aero gains.

This old picture of seconds saved over a 48min 40km TT comes to mind. It illustrates how miniscule the aero effect of aero bars would be... 
Of the 17 seconds (0.6%) saved by the frame, what fraction would be thanks to the bars? 

For non elite riders who don't crack a 40K in under 50mins, the aero gains would be even less.

The "aerobars" in the picture is due to the different riding position (forearms parallel to the ground, as mentioned above), and not the profile of the tubing.

Exact numbers would differ, but the principle stands.

Source: https://velo.outsideonline.com/2010/04/biggest-bang-for-your-buck-in-time-trial-equipment/
5cf24d81db2dcd30cc56b4bf89bbf98aa53c3165.jpeg 

Shoe covers and an aero TT helmet = good investments.

Posted
1 minute ago, Hairy said:

Shoe covers and an aero TT helmet = good investments.

and clip on aerobars - ~4% saving for less than R1k

Posted
1 hour ago, JayLow said:

I also thought the question related to comfort, not aero gains.

This old picture of seconds saved over a 48min 40km TT comes to mind. It illustrates how miniscule the aero effect of aero bars would be... 
Of the 17 seconds (0.6%) saved by the frame, what fraction would be thanks to the bars? 

For non elite riders who don't crack a 40K in under 50mins, the aero gains would be even less.

The "aerobars" in the picture is due to the different riding position (forearms parallel to the ground, as mentioned above), and not the profile of the tubing.

Exact numbers would differ, but the principle stands.

Source: https://velo.outsideonline.com/2010/04/biggest-bang-for-your-buck-in-time-trial-equipment/
5cf24d81db2dcd30cc56b4bf89bbf98aa53c3165.jpeg 

I’m turning 39.. I’m motivated by comfort more and more these days..🤣🤣

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dexter-morgan said:

Typical Bikehub, a question about Quality of handlebars turned into a discussion (Science lesson) on Aerodynamics. 😎

I tried so hard to explain I was looking for comfort.! 🤦‍♂️

Enter bikehub aerodynamics lecturers*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout