Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"Serious racing ambitions" is a very broad concept 😂.
I will not be sitting in front with you lot, so might as well fit the big ones. 
It is the Dylan Johnson magic RaceKing up front, so should go well.  
Still need to source a suitable rear in 2.1 or 50mm as I have lost faith in Thunderburts. 
 

Posted
4 hours ago, Sid the Sloth said:

The only races I would still run 45’s are the ones around Paarl, wellington, and Riebeek Kasteel, and at race to the Sea. The rest are all better on wider tyres! 

That is like 90% of the races 🙈

Posted
6 hours ago, Skubarra said:

That is like 90% of the races 🙈

Swartberg races (2 on the calendar), Garden Route giro, gravel burn, any of the Gauteng gravel races I’ve done, ceder, are all wide tyres. Greyton area, Caledon, and Hermanus are better on the faster tyres. I haven’t done Stanford but I think apart from the sandy sections it’s better on a faster rolling tyre. So to me it’s 50/50 but I understand the further away races are a bit less frequently attended. 

Posted
Just now, Sid the Sloth said:

Swartberg races (2 on the calendar), Garden Route giro, gravel burn, any of the Gauteng gravel races I’ve done, ceder, are all wide tyres. Greyton area, Caledon, and Hermanus are better on the faster tyres. I haven’t done Stanford but I think apart from the sandy sections it’s better on a faster rolling tyre. So to me it’s 50/50 but I understand the further away races are a bit less frequently attended. 

So for my personal race day split it is only about 30% of the time I spend on the skinny tyres. And training I always like the bigger tyres for our gravel (mountain biking) in the Southern Suburbs. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Sid the Sloth said:

Swartberg races (2 on the calendar), Garden Route giro, gravel burn, any of the Gauteng gravel races I’ve done, ceder, are all wide tyres. Greyton area, Caledon, and Hermanus are better on the faster tyres. I haven’t done Stanford but I think apart from the sandy sections it’s better on a faster rolling tyre. So to me it’s 50/50 but I understand the further away races are a bit less frequently attended. 

No I actually agree with you (except maybe for Swartberg which is about 40% - 50% tar?, for me only the Swartberg downhill at the end was nasty on the thinner tires)

Think we are lucky that we have good gravel surfaces around CPT and for most nearby events 45mm would be perfectly fine

Posted
14 hours ago, Skubarra said:

No I actually agree with you (except maybe for Swartberg which is about 40% - 50% tar?, for me only the Swartberg downhill at the end was nasty on the thinner tires)

Think we are lucky that we have good gravel surfaces around CPT and for most nearby events 45mm would be perfectly fine

@Sid the Sloth @Skubarra Not sure where you okes were in 2016 for the inaugural & original Swartberg 100 Grand Fonodo but just wanted to point out that Mike Posthumus won the event on 30 or 32mm Road Tires. Granted the gravel was Dom Perignon Quality back then. 

Posted
6 hours ago, milky4130 said:

@Sid the Sloth @Skubarra Not sure where you okes were in 2016 for the inaugural & original Swartberg 100 Grand Fonodo but just wanted to point out that Mike Posthumus won the event on 30 or 32mm Road Tires. Granted the gravel was Dom Perignon Quality back then. 

I was in grade 11. Haha. And Matthys Beukes came top 10 on a vintage road bike the first year I did the race as well after a long day in the break! 

Posted
6 hours ago, Sid the Sloth said:

I was in grade 11. Haha. And Matthys Beukes came top 10 on a vintage road bike the first year I did the race as well after a long day in the break! 

Now that you mention Matthys, I'm reminded that Mike had such an advantage with those road tires that he dropped Matthys up the Swartberg Pass, he was however on his mtb & had just came back from flu but did well to hang on for 2nd.

Posted

Which year did @eddy drag his Niner over the pass the day before the race?

Those early years were fantastic. It was 'new' and the mix of bikes and people was novel

Posted
On 4/10/2026 at 2:12 PM, Bro Derek said:

Which year did @eddy drag his Niner over the pass the day before the race?

Those early years were fantastic. It was 'new' and the mix of bikes and people was novel

28 April 2018. :cursing::oops:

 

Posted

How does Gageberg compare to Hans se kop?

Considering my current gearing up front and only comparable thing I have been up is Hans se kop.

42t 10/51 was right on the limit there.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Michael S said:

How does Gageberg compare to Hans se kop?

Considering my current gearing up front and only comparable thing I have been up is Hans se kop.

42t 10/51 was right on the limit there.

The gravel section from Lord's Wines to the start of the tar climb long but not particularly steep.

The tar climb to the finish venue is shorter but steeper than Hans se Kop, you'll be pushed to your limit there... 

Posted
58 minutes ago, Skubarra said:

The gravel section from Lord's Wines to the start of the tar climb long but not particularly steep.

The tar climb to the finish venue is shorter but steeper than Hans se Kop, you'll be pushed to your limit there... 

What about from the graveyard to Lords, that about 24km I think from memory at 8%

Posted
37 minutes ago, Pure Savage said:

What about from the graveyard to Lords, that about 24km I think from memory at 8%

good point!! In my mind the climb only started at lord's but I remember now that section - quite a few wheels came off there last year...

Posted
3 hours ago, Michael S said:

How does Gageberg compare to Hans se kop?

Considering my current gearing up front and only comparable thing I have been up is Hans se kop.

42t 10/51 was right on the limit there.

From Strava, Taking the segment from after the dip on Hanskop, it is shorter but steeper. Whereas the Galg is longer. What makes Galg harder is that it comes after 100kms, so if you spend all your pennies early on, you are going to be short when it comes to paying the bills later 😉

image.png.c7aaac6b6e0b812423537a18f194155e.png

image.png.5b4ea3e37ade1738e91f23c3c77f9a6c.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout