Harryn

Well, this thread may have been started in jest, but the fact that 39 people so far have voted for GO, just goes to show that its actually no joke at all.

Oh **** no. 2 trek bikes for sale!!

I have a Trek mtn bike and a Trek road bike. They are both gr8 bikes. The reason I know this is cos they have not yet collapsed under my fat ass. (Phew - glad I got that off my chest....ermm...ass)!

I have sold STI's to BigBen, and an Iphone to Marcymarc. Both clean, painless and easy deals with no bullsh1t at all. Pleasure dealing with both of them.

My, you certainly do display admirable restraint. Is it because you just don't want to get involved - or do you know the parties?

just read the first 2 or 3 pages or so and you'll get the picture.

So, TNT1, what is your take on all of this. Do you think Samma should pay Joss??

What does this mean??

To Porky J : I concur with thy decision in the above matter. It has been remarkably 1derful sitting in Judgment with you. I too need to take my leave so as to sup frugally on the chicken wings, beef pate, 4kg of rice, three sweet potatoes, pancakes that the wife has made 4 me (dunno why I can't lose the weight). Tomorrow we take down Hlope!

Porky, read the pleadings. Joss concedes that the shop sold the stuff, but claims that: 1. he was a partner in the business; 2. he has paid his ex partners the money that Samma owes to the business; 3. Samma is accordingly liable to him. Resist the urge to over simplify. The invoice is not relevant. In any event I do not believe that "hub justice" has provisions for discovery of documents. EG: we never look at any docs before convicting the kugel in her Prado of murder after she side-swipes us on Louis Botha Ave. We just say she is a murderer, plain and simple, and nobody ever had a problem with that!Harryn2008-06-04 10:31:36

Yes, but even if there was no cession, if Joss did indeed pay the mula over to Bester, then he still has a vaild claim against Samma, based on unjust enrichment. Doesn't unjust enrichment only apply if the sale was invalid or subsequently became invalid? SJ seems to be implying there was a valid sale between himself and Bester. Yes, Samma says that there was valid sale as between him and Bester, giving rise to a liability. Joss alleges that he discharged that liability for and behalf of Samma as they were Chinas. Ergo: Joss's estate has been depleted to the extent that Samma's has been enriched (unjustly if Joss's as Joss's Counsel will undoubtedly eloquently argue). In fact, Joss could take it further by stating that it was an implied agreement that Samma would repay him once was cash rich as he now is (lucky lucky man). But I must say Nothinness - I bow to your superior tactical skills - if Joss could get a deed of cession outta Bester, that would just be killer - Samma would have no defence to that scenario.

Look jury, lets keep the focus here: The exigencies of the dispute of Joss v Samma are such that the issue of the blow up pool/doll/books should be discussed only in the coffee break.

Yes, but even if there was no cession, if Joss did indeed pay the mula over to Bester, then he still has a vaild claim against Samma, based on unjust enrichment.

ok ok, I'll pay up - just please don't send the Nigerians. am scared for them that they will be victims of Xenophobic attacks - so I have decided to own up so as to protect the poor inncocent leg breakers.

Well, I must say I have found the intelligent and interesting debate in this thread to be hugely refreshing - a far cry from the kinda BS that goes on here lately. On the whole, Sean, I agree with the views you have expressed. If South Africa is going to excel in sports, it is not going to happen without dedication and commitment from the youngsters who form the talent pool. I also think that many kids at age 18 are in any event too young to take University seriously - delaying their tertiary education for a couple of years would probably benefit them in the long run (and certainly reduce the drop out rate).

Novel idea: Lets start a Campy / Shimano thread, and throw in some religious hate speech for good measure, and then Admin can have 35 less pages server space in 2 secs.

Look Samma, I am sure your'e a nice guy, and it was not my intention to start a flaming war with you, so please accept my aplogies for my newsflash / pussy / prozac post earlier on. In truth, I personally see nothing wrong with porn in its appropriate forum , and I do not find any of the pictures offensive. But the ladies on this site clearly do find them objectionable, and I believe we need to respect that, which is all my original post was about. I do not think that stance is a very inflammatory one. Aside from any other consideration, kids do frequent this site, and to my knowledge, there is nothing in our Constitution which condones exposing kids to pics of this nature.

I have this to say: 1. Widget is quite right. Its pathetic that we devote this kind of time and effort to Gareth. When he reads this he'll have a real good laugh, and will quite justifiably report back to his nationwide audience what a pathetic bunch cyclists (as represented by hubbers) clearly are. We demonstrate in this thread that we do not even have the intellectual endurance to bash him without degenerating into smut. Go Gareth! 2. If the ladies on this site find the kind of pictures that have posted here as being objectionable, then I think that we should respect that. They also have a right to be here, and they have the right to be heard. Go Fiasm!Harryn2008-05-06 13:01:57

ok I have scanned it, Pocket. Just tell me where to send it to, and its yours!

I have it - will quickly scan for you. Wanna pm me your email addy?

gr8 thanks! Have heard lots about it - gotta give it a go.

Can anyone tell me how many kays one lap of SBR is?