Depending on how its used, there is a legal issue on this - Don't get me wrong, I fully support it BUT !
We had the same systm on construction equipment we sold as the OEM. Our clients were mainly rental shops who used to get their equipment stolen fairly often. they would then send us the SER No's which we entered onto our workshop database. Inevitably most of these machines would come into our workshop for repairs and service at some point. We would then contact the original owner as well as inform the current owner that the machine was stolen. In the begining and being naive to the law, we handed then machine back to the original owner only to get charged by the new owner for theft, on top we were sued for a replacement machine or same value in cash. Which we lost in court.
So what does the law tell us to do
Finding a possibly stolen machine we had to inform the original owner that we were in possesion of his stolen machine that he reported to us. As well as inform the new owner that the machine was stolen.
The original owner then needs to contact the investigsating officer at SAPS to come collect the machine as proof/evidence of the crime - If the machine was insured then the insurance company has to be informed by the original owner who in turn must contact the SAPS to collect the machine. Once the machine is collected by SAPS, only they can decide to hand it back to the original owner or the insurance company, or keep it as evidence for any possible court case.
If none of the above happens then we were obliged to hand back the machine to the new owner who originally brought it in for repair.
So according to the law you can only hand back the machine to the SAPS or the new owner. In most cases we handed it back to the new owner as SAPS were not interested in coming to our offices or the investigating officer had closed the file or could not be contacted even though the original owner was standing there watching this all happen.
If we handed it back to the original owner we would get charged with theft and expected to make the new owner whole again.
It became such a ball ache we stopped doing it - we simply informed the original owner we had recieved the machine and gave the new owners details to let them sort it out between themsleves.
And heres the kicker - Now with the new Poppi act (or whatever its called) you cant even give the new owners details to the original owner - He can sue you for breach of privacy.
The bottom line is only the SAPS have the legal right to confiscate propery suspected of being stolen and its up to them what happens after that.
So the only thing a bike shop can do is contact the original owner which is useless because they cannot hand the bike back to him
or
Contact the investigating officer if their details are recorded with a case number and hand it over to him as stolen property for confiscation.
I wonder how many bike shops are willing to get this involved when they realise the ball ache