Jump to content

BaGearA

Members
  • Posts

    7399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BaGearA

  1. 1 hour ago, MORNE said:

    New mk4 has been fine (touch wood), although wheel builders seem reluctant to tension them up too much due to their older siblings bad reputation for cracking lol. So difficult to say i guess. 

    Wasn't there a post on Bikehub just the other day f an MK4 doing the same ?

     

    Trying to find it but 

  2. 11 minutes ago, PjT said:

    So this is interesting....they refined/redesigned the Merida 120

    I very much liked the previous design with the rear shock upright like the Giant Trance and Scott Spark....funny how one's perception is.

    It looked a lot more like a fun/trail bike. 

    Now the shock is underneath the top tube, which looks too much like a XC bike instead of a Trail bike. 

    https://www.merida-bikes.com/en-gb/p/product-news-bikes/the-new-one-twenty-630.html

     

    Merida120.png

    Looks much more XC than the bigger cousins but looks are just looks.

     

    Good points are 34.9mm seatpost and 170mm cranks ( although 165 would be cooler ) 

  3. 11 minutes ago, MORNE said:

    Like those who dont know that sram transmission (shifting) is basically linkglide but in AXS format 😅. Still they’ll want GX mechanical though because marketing. Im with @BaGearA, my next groupo on my big bike will be xt linkglide (if i can find some ofcourse)

    Same , gona eek out another two chains on my gx then its back to 11.

     

    Also dreading actually finding it 

  4. 8 minutes ago, Chadvdw67 said:

    Really nice looking bike, but I would prefer to have mechanical GX and Code RSC brakes on the Elite model, and maybe a 200mm rotor up front, doing that they could even drop the price a little, brakes and suspension are far more important than drivetrain on this kind of bike, in my opinion atleast

    Shimano linkglide 11 with some proper brakes and this bike will sell like hot cakes.

  5. 2 minutes ago, 117 said:

    It depends on what cable fittings the Bikeyoke needs compared to the RS. As an example: The Xfusion needs the cut end to be on the dropper fixed to it with a grub barrel. The Lyne is the other way around with the lug end on the dropper and the cut end on the remote. 
    The Xfusion is a pain in the rear end to get the lengths correct because of the cut end being where it is. The lyne is almost fit and not have to worry about removing it multiple times to get the length correct - win for the Lyne here

    Bike yoke is liek the lyne in this aspect 

     

    It also has a graphic at the bottom of the post that you use to get an idea of the exposed cable required.

     

     

    Revive-B4.png

  6. 11 minutes ago, Bundu Ric said:

    So then should I just buy a Bikeyoke?

    Can I use the Rockshox controls with the Bikeyoke or do they have their own specific controls? 

    Bikeyoke just uses a cable remote to activate so nearly any dropper remote works with them.

     

    No none of the working parts are interchangeable.

  7. Unfortunately it needs to go the CPT yes for it to be serviced by the agents unless you opt for one of the suspension guy sup north ( where I'm assuming you are ? ) 

     

    The reverb is an over engineered piece of garbage , that harsh but it is. 

     

    If you service it within the intervals it'll give years of good performance , but only if you stick to the maintenance schedule. 

     

    Sorry I don't have anything more constructive to say but I've rebuilt maybe around 20 myself and its a shite show 

     

     

    Cartridge droppers are better in terms of reliability ( especially if you don't maintain them ) 

     

    EG Lyne , One up , Bontrager , Transx 

     

    There are some very good hydraulic posts that are slightly ( ever so ) more reliable than the reverb , like the fox transfer but I put it in the same class as the reverb.

     

    Then there's the grand daddy ... Bikeyoke ( similar idea inside as the reverb , but super reliable and has the ability to be bled on the bike by the user ) its service intervals are also way longer.

  8. Lets say the hub is a write off without x part being available 

     

    If there are no other hubs available + The Rim has cracks around the spokes holes + Being Old 

     

    Then with a new spokes , nipples , tape and the labour 8k is not far off some mid ally stuff 

     

     

    Lots of info + pictures would help a great deal 

  9. 2 minutes ago, thebob said:

    Hi There

    Is there any way to view favourite ads that may have expired, but have not been delisted? I've had my eye on something for a while and would like to make a move on it, but have not been notified that it has been sold. I'm hoping it is just expired and still available, if I could at least make contact with the seller to confirm, it would be a big help

    Try searching for what you can remember in google and ad bikehub at the end 

     

    If it was deleted then AFAIK you can't view cause its not in the database anymore 

  10. 55 minutes ago, MORNE said:

    https://www.summitbikes.co.za/index.php?id_product=1740&controller=product
     

    grab em while they are hot. Garenteed to be the cheapest set you’ll find in store😅

    Quite a substantial set of things though. If you consider the rotors around 1k each and you get 4 in the box, including adaptors etc, i guess the price isn't too hectic. At least not Dominic’s. You’ll pay 5k more at other stores soon lol.  Pitty it’s the pikey red though.

     

    IMG_1011.jpeg

    Brakes , rotors ( incl options ) , adapters + Bleed kit 

     

    Seems like a freaking bargain to me 

  11. 6 minutes ago, DieselnDust said:

    Not sure what ls going on here in bold. Very confusing. I think you mean mineral. DoT absorbs water but its reflux boiling point is still much higher than mineral or water. Think of engine coolant, ethylene glycol, it raises the waters boiling point to prevent overheating and pump cavitation. DoT has a similar property. Mineral has to do the same but it’s not as good at it 

    I worded it like dog crap sorry , I meant if a significant amount of water has been absorbed then that will boil long before the oil it self and steam will rise to the lever and displace the oil giving a lever pull of nothing.

     

    Hope that makes sense ? 

  12. 38 minutes ago, NotSoBigBen said:

    Hence my question, I have more than one brake set that has not been bled since the year dot and still work fine. Bearing in mind I only have from the 'other' manufacturer and notwithstanding the fact I clearly don't stress them to that point! 

    Even if your bike stands dead still 

     

    I would still flush the brakes once a year , maybe that's total overkill but I do my own maintenance and I find it calming.

     

    I also have never had issues relating to the fluid itself while riding. 

     

    What headshot says about the sram brakes peeling their paint , I have also unfortunately seen that and the guide piston story aswell. Atleast its been recognized and fixed 

  13. 14 minutes ago, NotSoBigBen said:

    Genuine question @DieselnDust and other techies, other than maybe downhillers, extreme riders and proper XC riders, should any of us average Joe riders concern ourselves with boiling fluids?

    Boling water can hurt so stay away from that one.

     

    Mineral oil , bad for the system and oil. Flush asap but you still have some decent working service out of the brakes. 

     

    Dot , very bad. Because it absorbs water and if it has already then the steam will rise to the top ( your lever ) because it has a boiling point so much lower than the dot and suddenly there will be jack out of your lever , as in nothing. 

     

    The above scenarios are super hard to create , even if your brake oil is more than 10 years old. SO don't stress about it too much , regular maintenance on a modern system will give heaps of reliability and decent performance be it dot or mineral based.  

  14. 34 minutes ago, MORNE said:

    finally a reason to consider SRAM brakes...no more DOT brake fluid. I guess half of this could be marketing BS. You obviously then don't NEED brake fluid to make a powerful and consistent brakes. Mineral oil much better for your health, your paint, the environment etc.

    Won't say much other than the fluid your brakes uses to achieve a closed hydraulic system shouldn't influence which one you buy.

     

    ...or go get rid of your car.

     

     

    I like em , Props to Sram for always being on the development train.

  15. 41 minutes ago, MrJacques said:

    Saw this gap while washing my bike. I recently swapped handlebars and check headset bearings. I'm wondering if I put everything back together correctly. I should take more photos before taking things apart. I took one of the cable routing, but not of this part.

    It feels fine, turns freely and there's no knocking. I've also seen photos online of other bikes with the same gap. I'm probably going to take it apart again just to be sure.

    image.png.88da7a8ad532593ca20b2346531dde58.png

    You very likely have a cane creek crown race which has a very high stack.

     

    I think its just holding your bearing a fair way up and that's creating this kind of gap you see there.

     

     

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout