Jump to content

JXV

Members
  • Posts

    1652
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JXV

  1. Sure...it looks weird but think about it: 1) they are trying to minimise weight combining the shock anchorpoint with the TT lowpoint so that there is no need to mould a separate reinforced anchor point 2) you need standover height the most when you baulk at the top of a drop-off or steep slope, not on flat ground . In this position your front wheel is low and with the saddle at your back your crotch will more or less be right where that dip in the TT is.
  2. Simple really. Women on average shorter than men. This is a 29er so the stack height and rear axle height are relatively high compared to the low standover required...so the frame must dip in the middle and its proportions will look a bit unusual....
  3. Nice review! I ride 1x10 with a 34 chainring on 29er and also find I spin out on flat stuff but most women riders I know prefer to spin their pedals a lot faster than me so the lowish gearing is probably suitable for most of the target market. If you're a fitter/stronger female rider then no problem to change it. Most shops would likely swap it out at little or no cost to make the sale happen.
  4. Interested in your review. I have the 2014 34 Factory FIT CTD. It gets panned in reviews but still a better fork than any I had before
  5. Yes but the black anodising wears through quite fast where heels/shoes rub against it while pedalling. The silver ones look better for longer ....but would not suit the look you're going for
  6. Try shooting with the sunlight behind you and slightly off to either side....or use fill flash when shooting into strong sunlight. You'll get less deep shadows/contrast and richer looking colours.
  7. Surprisingly low for 105 kg...I suspect a dodgy gauge. You should be getting snakebites with tubes at those pressures.
  8. Just read the Pivot Mach 4 review on Pinkbike. They have an option for internal Di2 wiring with sealed ports and also a hatch in the downtube for the battery......so it begins.....
  9. For trail riding and singletracking - Rear tyre carries more of the rider's weight so it deforms more when riding normally. A faster rolling tyre at the rear is quite popular. Front tyre takes more steering and braking forces so a more grippy tyre tends to be preferred up front. For XC racing, depending on the course, it may pay off to fit fast rolling tyres with smaller tread blocks both front and rear.
  10. For trail riding and singletracking - Rear tyre carries more of the rider's weight so it deforms more when riding normally. A faster rolling tyre at the rear is quite popular. Front tyre takes more steering and braking forces so a more grippy tyre tends to be preferred up front. For XC racing, depending on the course, it may pay off to fit fast rolling tyres with smaller tread blocks both front and rear.
  11. Play with the b screw. My XT 10spd RD was designed for a 36t cassette but it handles a 42t extender cog just fine
  12. I dont like the idea of wireless.....separate small batteries for each component with no option for in-ride charging Rather standardise on an in-frame battery mount with internally routed cables that terminate at standard weatherproof sockets at the FD, RD and headtube areas. The FD location can be used to connect rear shock too, the head tube socket could also manage a connection to front shocks and the RD position also connects the hub generator.....
  13. I think I heard the same little birdie. Got a Whatsapp saying Di2 announcement for XT groupset was expected in July.....availability sometime after that... Btw Grant..... nice review. Re battery.....if it charges via USB as I suspect then surely you can hook up a bar mounted Powermonkey or othet small USB solar charger and charge while you ride. I foresee a future of freehub mounted generators with 5V regulators that can recharge your Di2 on the overrun when you are coasting during a ride....
  14. The discussion about gear ratios is pointless unless you also mention what wheel size you are using. Basically, 29er is 11.5% harder than 26" and about 6% harder than 27.5 so all else being equal (cluster, tyre profile etc) a 29er with 32 chainring will have practically the same ratios as a 27.5 with 34 chainring. A lot also depends if you like to mash your pedals or spin. I'm a masher. On a 29er with 11-42 10spd and 34 up front I find that I easily spin out on faster sections, especially the forestry roads linking sections of single track. Climbs are manageable but towards the end of a race when my legs are tired I am sometimes wanting more granny. At current fitness levels I reckon I would do better times on my old 2x10 with 26-38 front and 11-36 rear. It gives 11% more range at both ends than my 1x10 setup but I would gain 400g on the bike and lose the left hand dropper remote mounting that works so well. 6 of one and half dozen of the other. 1x10 is teaching me to spin more and making legs stronger on the climbs. If you have just converted, be prepared to stick with it until your legs adjust - your 1st ride after converting does not give the whole story.
  15. Remember these Pygas have carbon wheels, top groupsets, droppers and top end forks. Other carbon XC and Trail bikes in similar spec cost in the same region of R80 to R100k. If you downspecced the upside down fork for a Revelation or Fox Factory series, the XX1 group down to new GX or XT 11spd group and some decent alu wheels instead of the Pyga carbon you could knock R20k off these prices and still have a premium class bike.....
  16. Don't they offer a lifetime warranty on those things?
  17. You are building up a group of quality lenses there. I presume you want more reach in a walkaround lens than your 18-55 offers? The 24-105 is nice. A quality lens but lacking at the wide end for your crop sensor camera. I am very happy with Nikon's equivalent 24-120 f4 on my fullframe body. If you are prepared to compromise slightly on image quality to score some versatility then go for one of the superzooms - lots to choose from but Canon's 18-200 would be my suggestion.
  18. I would prefer to be able to purchase these as rims only. Reason being that I want to fit similar hubs to those I already have. This offers back-up spares in an emergency and also means I can swop wheelsets without having to reset brake calipers or derailleur indexing. Even though hub dimensions are supposed to be standardised, there are small differences between manufacturers so it is not guaranteed that a new wheelset with different hubs will be plug-and-play.
  19. Yes you probably can....[emoji12]
  20. The shift to the 45t is no bigger than the jump from 3rd to 2nd, namely 5t. The converted 11-40 11spd cassette goes 11-13-15-18-21-24-27-31-35-40-45. This is less of a jump than the 6 tooth gap between 36 and 42 on converted 10sp cassettes.
  21. If replacing on an existing bike then measure from centreline of your frame's seat tube to the centre of the chainring teeth (on a 1x) or middle ring if a 3x drivetrain or the midpoint between chainrings on 2x systems.
  22. Moonset...and sunrise.... over Cedara College this morning.
  23. [emoji106] [emoji106]I found a write-up on Pinkbike
  24. That's why One-up has now announced a 45t rear cog for Shimano's new 1 x11 XT group. In the same way as the previous 42t extender, it goes inside the 11sp cassette and then you replace the 17t and 19t with a new 18t cog. You can do this with the new 11sp (11-40) XT cassette because it is not pinned or milled from a single block of material like their SRAM counterparts. The gears ramp more smoothly than the 11-42 10sp extended cassettes because the tooth gaps are more consistent between cogs. you still retain 11, 13,15 as the 3 smallest cogs so there is less of a cadence jump between the faster gears than the 10sp converted cassettes which went 11,13,16,19.... This all gets you within 3% of an XX1 cassette's range at a lower price without having to worry about XD freehub/driver issues. The idea behind One-up's conversion is that, compared to XX1, the 45t granny allows you to run a bigger front chainring which in turn gives more speed in your smaller cogs, somewhat negating SRAM's 10t advantage.
  25. Great pic. Really expect us to believe you got the horizon that straight with a cellphone cam while riding ? [emoji12]
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout