I assume that this is how the frame was assembled. I ask this because I cant see any degassing apertures for the weld attachment of the down tube and top tube to the head tube. They may now be covered by the reinforcing tube. cont'd The horizontal crack is then answered by your answer as to the assembly. If the cup flanges were welded on, then chickenrun4me and pappa bear and pal prof have some sound contributions. But not entirely. Its clearly related to the HAZ and the quality of post weld HT. But generally: (a) the material is very thin; depending on the weld prep as I detailed above, there may be no wall thickness variation; (b) weld filler metal diameter cools the weld pool; © and my bet that such an esteemed company would be semi if not fully automated to ensure optimal repeatability and quality. (d)As for heat sinking I am not sure as to the jig construction and its influence on heat flow, but it may well balance the equation. It the head tube flange is formed and stiffened then the horizontal crack simply follows a forming line or the last section of single walling before strengthened by double tubing. What do you think? cont'd In my opinion this crack originated from the head set cup and specifically from the inside diameter of the headset cup. Why? Simple maths: the ID is the smaller circumference. and the OD the larger circumference. The race material has a yield strength and elongation value indicative of the point of gross failure. The race is hardened material and is inherently stressed in comparison to ferritic material. Express this as a percentage of the circumference and the smaller ID has the least units required in expansion to express a failure. The crack then exists and simply propagates outward along the stress vector. Eventually the head tube flange will also fail. This is the vertical tear. The aluminium fails because of 'fatigue'(constant expansion and contraction) and then the compressive relationship is lost. It will displace horizontally on the next weakest point on the material which is circumferential. I've covered this discussion. In all though the circumferential crack is consequential and not causative, therefore not the focus. My assumption: A significant outward force was exerted to the inside of the headset cup, presumably by a very strong upward force of the fork into the head tube due to play. (very much like driving a taper into the bearing ring). The broken headset cup then sheared the frame. Difficult one. Good luck with the claim. I think its a tough one. The Frame manufacturer will consult the Head set manufacturer/supplier . The headset manufacturer will have the steel and heat treatment analysed in an independent laboratory. The likelihood of a non-conformance is low to zero. I think you had play across (up and down) the steerer. HeartCoppi2010-02-17 15:57:49