E1A104 Posted July 1, 2011 Share If AC even sinks that low. I doubt he expects/needs/wants all and sundry to bow down and worship at his feet and if you don't there must be something wrong with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted July 1, 2011 Share If AC even sinks that low. I doubt he expects/needs/wants all and sundry to bow down and worship at his feet and if you don't there must be something wrong with you. Can you get lower than a proven doper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaLoCo Posted July 1, 2011 Share Can you get lower than a proven doper? I was going to say it can only get lower if you blame the Nesquik bunny, but then I remembered that he already blamed the cows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted July 1, 2011 Share Can you get lower than a proven doper? Fork it your getting old...Should have said: Can you get lower than a proven doper who denies doping? Edited July 1, 2011 by SwissVan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyr249 Posted July 1, 2011 Share spin spin baby! At least AC is claiming the peleton only, la was the most tested athlete in the whole wide world and Texas. Texas is not the whole wide world! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E1A104 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Texas is not the whole wide world! Texas is bigger than the whole wide world and that is why I had to add it seperately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E1A104 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Can you get lower than a proven doper? naaa probably not, although perhaps the one that gets bust and then only gets the "exemption note" from his Doctor. No, you are right, nothing lower than a proven doper who denies doping, scum of the earth the lot of them. What about a hubber who leaves in a huff threatening never to return but then returns using a different name, is that low? What about cyclists who say that they are finished with racing but stage a dismal comeback a few years later or cyclists who say they will post the results of their tests on the www and then don't cause it is apparently too expensive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big H* Posted July 1, 2011 Share naaa probably not, although perhaps the one that gets bust and then only gets the "exemption note" from his Doctor. No, you are right, nothing lower than a proven doper who denies doping, scum of the earth the lot of them. What about a hubber who leaves in a huff threatening never to return but then returns using a different name, is that low? What about cyclists who say that they are finished with racing but stage a dismal comeback a few years later or cyclists who say they will post the results of their tests on the www and then don't cause it is apparently too expensive? Now that has never been proven AAR TOO DEE TOO, he has never been stripped of his tite like Berto may be. Edited July 1, 2011 by eccentric1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E1A104 Posted July 4, 2011 Share Now that has never been proven AAR TOO DEE TOO, he has never been stripped of his tite like Berto may be. What was never proven? That he tested positive and the exemption only appeared after the test? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big H* Posted July 4, 2011 Share What was never proven? That he tested positive and the exemption only appeared after the test? Whaddever you fil your own words in the gaps anyways, you could have been a reporter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E1A104 Posted July 5, 2011 Share Whaddever you fil your own words in the gaps anyways, you could have been a reporter Quite a mature response for a toppie. I asked the question as it was not clear from yr post what you were on about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pastapouch Posted July 5, 2011 Share What was never proven? That he tested positive and the exemption only appeared after the test?Jaaaaa right, he never tested positive(ie never doped) but he outridden Ulrich who was caught, vinokourov. Ulrich, Vino must sue their doctors for giving them crappy roids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrigs Posted July 5, 2011 Share And whilst this debate goes too and fro ------ Go Andy!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNT1 Posted July 5, 2011 Share Now that has never been proven AAR TOO DEE TOO, he has never been stripped of his tite like Berto may be. What was never proven? That lance tested positive, and his team magically produced a back dated TUE? After denying to the press that he had a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) to use any drug in the 1999 Tour, Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid. The team, as related by Emma O'Reilly, created a backdated TUE that was accepted by the UCI. That seems like proof to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNT1 Posted July 5, 2011 Share Do you have any Therapeutic Use Exemptions?No. Never have. Never? What about the cortisone?Well, obviously there was the cortisone. From the horse's mouth. http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/345599/lance-armstrong-exclusive-interview.html Edited July 5, 2011 by TNT1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big H* Posted July 5, 2011 Share What was never proven? That lance tested positive, and his team magically produced a back dated TUE? After denying to the press that he had a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) to use any drug in the 1999 Tour, Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid. The team, as related by Emma O'Reilly, created a backdated TUE that was accepted by the UCI. That seems like proof to me. NOT while he was winning hs seven TdF races. Emma the snitch "related" her own version, verrrrry correct as you wrote it, show better proof, after you had your wee. If your Auntie just wanted, I could have been "related" to you! Edited July 5, 2011 by eccentric1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now