fabes Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Fantastic game of cricket. Great finish. So happy for the West Indies
dev null Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 (edited) That last over was really weird.  Stokes did not for one second think of maybe doing a slow bouncer or a wide yorker. If I was an English supporter I would be very upset. Happy for the Windies. Edited April 3, 2016 by Moridin
Steven Knoetze (sk27) Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 That last over was really weird.  Stokes did not for one second think of maybe doing a slow bouncer or a wide yorker. If I was an English supporter I would be very upset. Happy for the Windies. He tried for the conventional Yorker. problem is he tried 4 times and didn't get one right!!!!He looked gutted, even Gayle looked like he was telling Sammy it's over after Jordan's over.
GLuvsMtb Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 A lesson SA can learn is looking at the Windies and how they very rarely have bowlers bowling more than 1 over spells, Bravo excluded. He is just a machine!!!! Best bowler of the tournament for me, the way he disguises that slower ball is amazing.Very few teams allowed long spells, batters pick up the pace and length and generally the 2nd or 3rd overs are expensive!!I think part of our problem is that we have been borrowing ideas from others, opposed to coming up with our own fresh ideas. If Phangiso played either of the games against Windies / England, we would have gone through to the semis. Our problem was not so much rotation of bowlers, but team selection.
babse Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 not the biggest T20 fan but watched it anyway, very entertaining game of cricket (thats what its about right). Well done to the Windies!  Dont mistake this as a great cricket team, T20 vs Test cricket are miles apart (same as Fiji in rugby 7s vs 15s). GLuvsMtb 1
Steven Knoetze (sk27) Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Afghanistan, only team to beat the Windies in the world cup............ Joe Low 1
Shebeen Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I think part of our problem is that we have been borrowing ideas from others, opposed to coming up with our own fresh ideas. If Phangiso played either of the games against Windies / England, we would have gone through to the semis. Our problem was not so much rotation of bowlers, but team selection.You can't just make sweeping statements like that. We probably would have won both those games if we chased, but you just don't know. It's like blaming the WC loss to nz in the semis down to philander/abbot - just silliness really. Also as an FYI, he did actually play the WIndies game, which we lost.Â
Shebeen Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 That last over was really weird.  Stokes did not for one second think of maybe doing a slow bouncer or a wide yorker. If I was an English supporter I would be very upset. Happy for the Windies.So funny how everyone goes for Stokes.....he was always the 5th (or even 6th bowler in their lineup). Root bowls just one magic over, Ali doesn't even get a bowl at all. So in the end Morgan bowled his finishers out early and left stokes to close out it with lots in the bag. Yet Stokes gets the blame...remember Captain Morgan scored 27*, 12, 0, 22, 0, 5 so is clearly going to be getting some of the heat.
Steven Knoetze (sk27) Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 So funny how everyone goes for Stokes.....he was always the 5th (or even 6th bowler in their lineup). Root bowls just one magic over, Ali doesn't even get a bowl at all. So in the end Morgan bowled his finishers out early and left stokes to close out it with lots in the bag. Yet Stokes gets the blame...remember Captain Morgan scored 27*, 12, 0, 22, 0, 5 so is clearly going to be getting some of the heat. Weren't both of Morgan's ducks first ballers too?
Shebeen Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Weren't both of Morgan's ducks first ballers too?well in T20 a first baller is better than 0 (6)! Steven Knoetze (sk27) 1
'Dale Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Yeah,Stokes was searching for that Yorker (if you miss, I Hit!) and he failed 4/4Â Beautiful gameFascinating dramaMagical result (out of nothing) Joe Low 1
dev null Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 So funny how everyone goes for Stokes.....he was always the 5th (or even 6th bowler in their lineup). Root bowls just one magic over, Ali doesn't even get a bowl at all. So in the end Morgan bowled his finishers out early and left stokes to close out it with lots in the bag. Yet Stokes gets the blame...remember Captain Morgan scored 27*, 12, 0, 22, 0, 5 so is clearly going to be getting some of the heat.  That really was not Stokes's fault though.  He is not a death bowler, and Morgan knows that. It was Morgan's fault for not bowling Stokes out in the middle overs.  He should have left the last 6 overs to the death bowling specialists like Willie and Jordan.
Shebeen Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 great article on the WIndies victory from my fav cricketscribe http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-world-twenty20-2016/content/story/995019.html Mntboy and Kranswurm 2
Mntboy Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 great article on the WIndies victory from my fav cricketscribe http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-world-twenty20-2016/content/story/995019.htmlOl' JK has a way of telling a narrative where he weaves different strands into a full and complete story, fully fledged. He gets to the heart of it without losing sight of people's humanity. This link is just another one of his quality writing pieces.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now