Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah agreed . Bulls were really good . In all phases . Nice game .

Stormers just never had a shout . But it’s an away game so no drama . Give it a week or 2 .

 

Sharks were also good today so things look ok to start

  • Replies 7.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yeah agreed . Bulls were really good . In all phases . Nice game .

Stormers just never had a shout . But it’s an away game so no drama . Give it a week or 2 .

 

Sharks were also good today so things look ok to start

Not sure I agree with you regarding the Stormers..................................

 

 

But let's see.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

i'll revive this one...

 

Akker gets 3 and Britz gets 4 week bans after their botz on saturday :mellow:

The more punches you actually land the less punishment not to mention it looked like Akker was first with the headbutt.

 

Britz must have tjooned him good

Posted

The more punches you actually land the less punishment not to mention it looked like Akker was first with the headbutt.

 

Britz must have tjooned him good

I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't look at it in super detail. Would have made sense to me if Akker received the bigger sanction.

 

Probably some legal representation that I missed.

Posted

I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't look at it in super detail. Would have made sense to me if Akker received the bigger sanction.

 

Probably some legal representation that I missed.

What you missed is Stefan terblanche being on the foul play committee ????
Posted

What you missed is Stefan terblanche being on the foul play committee

 

Actually what you missed is that Akker initially got a 6 week ban, but it was reduced to 3 because he pleaded guilty. Brits and the Bulls are still fighting his case. If Brits pleaded guilty to the charges he probably would have got a reduced suspension.

Posted

Actually what you missed is that Akker initially got a 6 week ban, but it was reduced to 3 because he pleaded guilty. Brits and the Bulls are still fighting his case. If Brits pleaded guilty to the charges he probably would have got a reduced suspension.

 

Can't help but think its pretty daft of him to appeal the sentence - can see him getting the full 6 weeks now. But lets see

Posted

Actually what you missed is that Akker initially got a 6 week ban, but it was reduced to 3 because he pleaded guilty. Brits and the Bulls are still fighting his case. If Brits pleaded guilty to the charges he probably would have got a reduced suspension.

 

Brits did plead guilty. It was Akker's first time, but Brits' third... he's actually lucky he did not get the full 6.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout