29er-norman Posted July 22, 2012 Author Posted July 22, 2012 Congrats to the OP. Second post and you are already as narrow minded as most of the hubbers on here. You'll fit right in... says the chap with cleavage in his avatar.
29er-norman Posted July 22, 2012 Author Posted July 22, 2012 personally i also think riding a 29er is faaar more extreme because you are higher off the ground when you fall thus more dangerous.
DR ◣◢ Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 Can we stop feeding the troll please. Clearly only here to get the attention. TopFuel, Azonic and Leonard 3
JTK Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 personally i also think riding a 29er is faaar more extreme because you are higher off the ground when you fall thus more dangerous.lol!!! dude. if you had any hope of being taken seriously you certainly sank that with this one :D
Goodbadugly Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 personally i also think riding a 29er is faaar more extreme because you are higher off the ground when you fall thus more dangerous.Ahhh. A trolling rookie. Your maths homework for tomorrow done?
flymango Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 Only on The Hub will a 26 vs 29 debate start during the finish of the greatest cycle race on earth. Cav' 1
Andrew_ew Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 Because all the guys who think niners can ride on water keep drowning.
Brian Fantana Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 personally i also think riding a 29er is faaar more extreme because you are higher off the ground when you fall thus more dangerous. A 29er XC bike will have a similar BB height as a 26" XC bike, so you will be the same distance from the ground, your hands might be a little higher. So unless your legs grow as fast as your unpopularity on here you will sit at the same height.
dev null Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 Looking at your hub name that question you posted was loaded with the sole reason to stir. Feeling popular already?
Azonic Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 that horses for different courses wasnt very funny. http://i.qkme.me/353ljn.jpg Brian Fantana 1
Redlight Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 it really doesnt make sense to me why 26inch bikes are still in production especially if you look at the amount of 29ers and how popular they are in south africa at the moment please share your thoughts.it really doesnt make sense to me why 26inch bikes are still in production especially if you look at the amount of 29ers and how popular they are in south africa at the moment please share your thoughts. its just a marketing phase we passing through, the bike industry saw a gullible market and exploited it.the rest of the world still rides 26".and trust me, they will all be back to the 26"
HairyLegs Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 29" = Marathon racing.26" = proper XC racing - like we do in Europe.
Azonic Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 personally i also think riding a 29er is faaar more extreme because you are higher off the ground when you fall thus more dangerous. http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m78k1nqSvz1qevcw3o2_500.png dev null, StumpJumPer and TopFuel 3
TheV Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 (edited) To the op, you are a: Edited July 22, 2012 by TheV
TheV Posted July 22, 2012 Posted July 22, 2012 (edited) You obviously know nothing about bikes and if I had to meet someone like you in the street id'd give you a P-K. Edited July 22, 2012 by TheV Azonic 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now