Jump to content

Your Enduro ride


RockCoach

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

 

 

Master NFNF, is this ok?

 

1377058_10151669202470658_580812639_n.jpg

 

 

Nevermind the hoses long or short... different strokes for different folks.

 

What hoses are those?

 

I wanted to fit colour hoses on my slx, but couldn't find 'nice' colours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nevermind the hoses long or short... different strokes for different folks.

 

What hoses are those?

 

I wanted to fit colour hoses on my slx, but couldn't find 'nice' colours

 

That's a Goodridge conversion. Higher volume (more fluid) and less flex under pressure. There fore more power and less fade.

 

...but they look cool too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That's a Goodridge conversion. Higher volume (more fluid) and less flex under pressure. There fore more power and less fade.

 

...but they look cool too!

 

Where can i get those goodridge hoses?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the smoothest rider, I am aware of that BUT the wrong stroke length effectively means that the suspension doesn't work. And that doesn't inspire confidence when you are a noob trying to become smoother.

 

OK, last night I did a few checks on my bike before Attakwas. I deflated the shock completely, and with the shock compressed completely, there was a 3mm gap between the FD cable guide and the tyre tread. This was with a WTB Bronson 26x2.3 tyre and a 23mm rim with 21mm inner width. The tyre is about 70% worn down though, and a new one will definitely touch the cable guide (they have huge knobs).

 

But I also fitted a new rear tyre, a Maxxis Ardent 26x2.25 and with the shock completely compressed there is a nice 4mm gap between the guide and the tyre tread. With a wider rim such as a ZTR flow or WTB i23, the gap will be even bigger because the wider rim will pull the tyre flatter, thereby reducing the overall diameter a fraction. So rim and tyre width can solve the problem to a certain extent, not ideal, but a nice work-around solution.

 

Bottom line, the stroke length is incorrect and ideally a shock with 50mm stroke length should be fitted.

 

Regarding the DHX shock, I believe those were designed to give a very linear feel, while the Monarch is more progressive which might also make a difference in our perceptions of the bike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CRC

 

Cool thx.

 

Checked a few months ago & they didn't have stock.

 

How would I go about crimping the correct fittings for my brakes?

Any special tools needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

OK, last night I did a few checks on my bike before Attakwas. I deflated the shock completely, and with the shock compressed completely, there was a 3mm gap between the FD cable guide and the tyre tread. This was with a WTB Bronson 26x2.3 tyre and a 23mm rim with 21mm inner width. The tyre is about 70% worn down though, and a new one will definitely touch the cable guide (they have huge knobs).

 

But I also fitted a new rear tyre, a Maxxis Ardent 26x2.25 and with the shock completely compressed there is a nice 4mm gap between the guide and the tyre tread. With a wider rim such as a ZTR flow or WTB i23, the gap will be even bigger because the wider rim will pull the tyre flatter, thereby reducing the overall diameter a fraction. So rim and tyre width can solve the problem to a certain extent, not ideal, but a nice work-around solution.

 

Bottom line, the stroke length is incorrect and ideally a shock with 50mm stroke length should be fitted.

 

Regarding the DHX shock, I believe those were designed to give a very linear feel, while the Monarch is more progressive which might also make a difference in our perceptions of the bike.

 

Sidewinder has wide Subrosa rims and WTB Wolverine which is less volume than a Bronson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sidewinder has wide Subrosa rims and WTB Wolverine which is less volume than a Bronson.

 

Dude, those Wolverine 2.2's are FAT. They're the same or bigger than a 2.3 Weirwolf and 2.5 Minion. Smaller knobs, of course, but just as big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Dude, those Wolverine 2.2's are FAT. They're the same or bigger than a 2.3 Weirwolf and 2.5 Minion. Smaller knobs, of course, but just as big.

 

They are quite fat. I know... but smaller than a Bronson. I have just switched from a Bronson to Wolverine at the rear. On a few occasions I have missed the extra volume of the Bronsons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are quite fat. I know... but smaller than a Bronson. I have just switched from a Bronson to Wolverine at the rear. On a few occasions I have missed the extra volume of the Bronsons.

 

Just get a choob job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout