Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There was a pool of blood in the city centre about 5km from the end. Anyone know what it was about?

 

Yip, I was in E group, and must have happened just before we got there.

 

Its the local passers by, who think they can try and beat the cyclists coming through at probably 50km/hr.

 

A rider was injured and lying on the floor, together with a pedestrian lying on her back, and bleeding profusely from a head wound.

  • Replies 396
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I think I was one of the three... on the red SWorks... we flipping pedalled forever on our own until the rest of A group caught us coming into Durbs. What was quite disturbing was the accident the 2 ladies had trying to tail us at 60km/h - hope they're not seriously injured. Looking at the results only 15 of them broke away. I had a bit left for the sprint which is always fun, managed 3rd in that... all that after riding 450km to Pietermaritzburg from Kroonstad.

 

I was in the 2nd A batch group - dropped my chain at Richmond Road (just after Fox Hill) and had some work to do to get back onto the group - caught them by Cato Ridge. I think I was right behind you in the final sprint - in the red and white Mr Price kit.

 

I saw the riders down on Fields Hill - it looked pretty nasty - hope they are ok - there are some nasty potholes there - cost me a rim and a saddle earlier this year.

 

There was almost a big pile up at the corner into the finishing straight when that pedestrian crossed right in front of the bunch.

 

Marshals were napping a bit there.

Posted

I was in the 2nd A batch group - dropped my chain at Richmond Road (just after Fox Hill) and had some work to do to get back onto the group - caught them by Cato Ridge. I think I was right behind you in the final sprint - in the red and white Mr Price kit.

 

I saw the riders down on Fields Hill - it looked pretty nasty - hope they are ok - there are some nasty potholes there - cost me a rim and a saddle earlier this year.

 

There was almost a big pile up at the corner into the finishing straight when that pedestrian crossed right in front of the bunch.

 

Marshals were napping a bit there.

 

The front B bunch also had to dodge a pedestrian (and a TAXI) coming through town before turning left to the finish straight.

 

We also had to go around a few of the shorter distance riders who were in the middle of the road. I am sure they must've got a bit of fright when the bunch passed them at 50kmh+.

Posted

Are the hills really that bad ?

I dont do many road races - actually it's my first road race in over 6 years, but there didnt seem to be much climbing /

Sani day 2 has 1600m odd of ascent, with some brutal climbs, so maybe by basis for comparrison is a bit off.

 

This is a genuine question by the way. I was just wondering how the Shova rates against other races.

Garmin registered 1460m of ascending for the Shova.

Posted (edited)

Saw this on Racetec this morning. Guess someone was editing the data base directly. Check average speed of "winner"

 

file:///C:\Users\DEREK~1.MET\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image002.jpgpost-42726-0-22194100-1381836804_thumb.jpg

Edited by TooTall?
Posted

That's interesting - My Garmin reports 1293m gain and 103.26km

Elevation Gain: 1,271 m Elevation Loss: 1,913 m

 

Did you correct/update the elevation on the website?

Posted (edited)

With elevation correction on, I got 1,427m elevation and 2,017m descent on my Garmin Edge. Distance 103km.

 

The same gpx. file on Strava, with its elevation correction, gives an elevation of 1,538m.

 

I suspect 1,100-1,200 is closer to the truth.

Edited by Blackadder
Posted

Did you correct/update the elevation on the website?

 

In my case, yes. There is a setting on Garmin Connect and on Strava that allows you to choose elevation correction on or off. Usually I find this gives results that correlate closely with those other people publish. In this case, my figures are a bit higher.

Posted

Slightly off topic - I've seen that GPS devices are not 100% accurate. The other day I went for a ride with a 310XT on my wrist, and a Edge705 on my bike. At the end of the 90km ride the two devices differed by 800m. I had disable auto-stop/start on both. Maybe that's why most pro's still rely on wheel magnet sensors for their speed/distance stats.

Posted (edited)

Elevation gain/descent measurements differ due to 2 reasons:

 

Calculating elevation utilizing gps is very inaccurate. This is normally overcome by using a existing elevation database such as NASA's STRM database. This is what the Garman elevation correction feature does.

 

The other issue is that gain/descent measurements suffer from the coastline paradox, that when you try measure it more accurately, you don't get a more accurate answer, just a bigger answer.

Edited by garyvdm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout