Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

looks like Ibis stole the march on Enve's take on the wider-is-better bandwagon...

 

Ride Tuned

Each model in the ENVE M Series is designed with a specific rider profile in mind. In the past we had classified riders into three general categories in a one size fits all XC, AM, and DH designation that worked well for some but left others wondering where they fit. The ENVE M Series features four completely new models that classify riders by the ride style that they most closely identify with. Each rim model is designated by a style ratio that represents a rider’s inclination towards descending vs. ascending. Tuning each rim to a specific application meant creating a rim that is fittingly light, stiff, and durable for its intended application. As such, each rim in our next generation M Series is lighter and stiffer than its comparable first generation predecessor. Developing laminates that cater to a specific ride application is only part of the story. Each rim is optimized to perform within a range of specific tire widths that are most prevalent for the intended application. By refining the interface between rim and tire we create more precise and predictable handling characteristics and thus a more efficient wheel system.

http://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb10787331/p4pb10787331.jpg

 

 

Pinksauce

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

http://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb10787330/p4pb10787330.jpg

http://es.pinkbike.org/sprt/f2/s/0.gif dirtstar59 (5 mins ago)

Enve makes nice product. Damn expensive but nice....however I wonder if Enve and Ibis are exceeding (aka larger circumference) ETRTO rim standards in order to make the hookless bead work. Hookless designs are actually quite ancient and are of course used in moto and auto..in theory they should work very well but ..if there is any type of malfunction due to tire rim incompatibility then there is a concern with the rims not following international standards...

Edited by 2Nutz
Posted

looks like Ibis stole the march on Enve's take on the wider-is-better bandwagon...

 

 

 

Pinksauce

Actually I have a problem with their designation.. it's been done before. What that table shows is: from left, xc/trail/freeride/dh. Not that different when you add normal words.

 

But, the colours! Now that changes everything.. Pantone references to boot. Hmm, very technical.

 

Hookless beads, must surely rely on a tighter fit.. expect a new standard of tyres soon.

Posted

Slight HI jack.............

 

The data is in. In a straight line, on a smooth surface, in a laboratory environment, 559 is the fastest. Hands down.

 

 

http://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb10776233/p4pb10776233.jpg

Because the jump in size between 559 EnduRAD and 650b is so small relative to the jump between 650b and 29", 559 is ideally positioned to help 650b riders find that extra edge. 559's size positions it to excel in the aggressive, long-travel enduro market, and when you get on 559 we think you'll feel the difference immediately. Can you feel it yet? It feels like Enduro.

 

 

 

http://es.pinkbike.org/sprt/f2/s/193.gif jackiead (Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10)

Everyone realises that 559, is 26" right?

Posted

Slight HI jack.............

 

 

The data is in. In a straight line, on a smooth surface, in a laboratory environment, 559 is the fastest. Hands down.

 

 

http://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb10776233/p4pb10776233.jpg

Because the jump in size between 559 EnduRAD and 650b is so small relative to the jump between 650b and 29", 559 is ideally positioned to help 650b riders find that extra edge. 559's size positions it to excel in the aggressive, long-travel enduro market, and when you get on 559 we think you'll feel the difference immediately. Can you feel it yet? It feels like Enduro.

 

 

 

http://es.pinkbike.org/sprt/f2/s/193.gifjackiead(Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10)

Everyone realises that 559, is 26" right?

 

BWAHAHAHAHA, that's flipping hilarious!

Posted

Actually I have a problem with their designation.. it's been done before. What that table shows is: from left, xc/trail/freeride/dh. Not that different when you add normal words.

 

But, the colours! Now that changes everything.. Pantone references to boot. Hmm, very technical.

 

Hookless beads, must surely rely on a tighter fit.. expect a new standard of tyres soon.

 

nope: UST beads already cover that.

Posted

Also scratching my head why the removal of that would add strength.

I think what they've done is make the rest sidewall of the rim as thick as rim bead was, and then to save weight, decrease the sidewall height. Effectively, the sidewall got thicker, but shorter. It being thicker means its less prone to bending under impact.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout