Jump to content

Poll1: Best director  

136 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Director of all time

    • Woody Allen
      1
    • Paul Thomas Anderson
      1
    • Wes Anderson
      5
    • James Cameron
      8
    • Coen Brothers
      7
    • Francis Ford Coppola
      4
    • Walt Disney
      4
    • Clint Eastwood
      16
    • David Fincher
      2
    • Alfred Hitchcock
      4
    • Peter Jackson
      4
    • Stanley Kubrick
      8
    • Akira Kurosawa
      1
    • George Lucas
      10
    • David Lynch
      2
    • Sam Mendes
      0
    • Cristopher Nolan
      11
    • Guy Ritchie
      16
    • Martin Scorsese
      17
    • Ridley Scott
      17
    • M. Night Shyamalan
      2
    • Steven Spielberg
      33
    • Quentin Tarantino
      33
    • Orson Welles
      0
    • Edgar Wright
      1
    • Michael Bay
      5


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Glory with Brad Pitt was quite good and I rate it highly

 

Is that the tank story? I think my son rented it last weekend, but circumstances meant we didn't get around to watching it. 

Edited by Tumbleweed
Posted (edited)

Glory with Brad Pitt was quite good and I rate it highly

 

Fury?

 

But yes - awesome movie

 

Edit - Glory (excl Brad Pitt) also a pretty good war movie

Edited by Skubarra
Posted

Fury?

 

But yes - awesome movie

 

Edit - Glory (excl Brad Pitt) also a pretty good war movie

 

 

Yes, FURY  :blush:

Hehehee

Excellent acting by The Brad

 

Le'me edit my earlier post.

Posted

im not a huge fan of modern war movies - that one on Sunday was bearable but so full of nauseating ra ra

 

Ja, I also struggle to get into them a bit. I was so disappointed with Ridley Scott's Black Hawk Down when I read up about it. Despite the insistence that it was as accurate as possible, there was a faie amount of criticism about it being very pro-American.  

Posted

Ja, I also struggle to get into them a bit. I was so disappointed with Ridley Scott's Black Hawk Down when I read up about it. Despite the insistence that it was as accurate as possible, there was a faie amount of criticism about it being very pro-American.  

 

It's an interesting point - most modern Hollywood war movies "based on true events" are grossly inaccurate, basically American propaganda - American Sniper is a good example.

 

But then on the flip side, they are movies not documentaries (even if they market themselves as true stories). If they get a lot of facts wrong but it's an entertaining & intriguing hour-and-a-half does it mean it's a bad movie? 

Posted

It's an interesting point - most modern Hollywood war movies "based on true events" are grossly inaccurate, basically American propaganda - American Sniper is a good example.

 

But then on the flip side, they are movies not documentaries (even if they market themselves as true stories). If they get a lot of facts wrong but it's an entertaining & intriguing hour-and-a-half does it mean it's a bad movie? 

 

Ja, I get that. And I'm willing to suspend disbelief for a bit of skop, skiet, donner, bliksem, nuke!...but, when you get filmmakers like Ridley Scott being all indignant about criticism of the accuracy of his film, and his political bias, it becomes an issue.  

Posted

It's an interesting point - most modern Hollywood war movies "based on true events" are grossly inaccurate, basically American propaganda - American Sniper is a good example.

 

But then on the flip side, they are movies not documentaries (even if they market themselves as true stories). If they get a lot of facts wrong but it's an entertaining & intriguing hour-and-a-half does it mean it's a bad movie? 

 

thats why band of brothers is soo good...sure they embellished certain things..but for most part it is a fair account of what happened..while still affording us the opportunity to personalise and relate to characters and situations

Posted

Question:

 

If one sets out to make a documentary, is there a general rule to say X amount of information is to be factual? Who checks it?

 

What I'm getting at, that in film and visual reporting, there is a fair amount of editing that happens, chronological sequence of events that may be taken out of context and skewed to get a certain "message" across (Think, Carte Blanche)

 

I personally don't put too much faith into "true stories", the only "reality" is the one that is observed (think accurate perceptions of events - not the observed photon ) in the Television/Movie Theatre sense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout