Jump to content

12 watts, really?


NotSoBigBen

Recommended Posts

Posted

Saw this on Tweeta .... I just shake my head at times  :whistling:

 

José Been ‏@TourDeJose  51m51 minutes ago
Orica tests automatic chain lubers, positioned on down tube. Possible gain: 12 watts (via @cyclingtips)

 

post-271-0-32872200-1484726816_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Saw this on Tweeta .... I just shake my head at times  :whistling:

 

José Been ‏@TourDeJose  51m51 minutes ago

Orica tests automatic chain lubers, positioned on down tube. Possible gain: 12 watts (via @cyclingtips)

 

attachicon.gifC2b3-rnXEAAzO2S.jpg

 

The tests show that it does make around an 8watt difference, but only after 6 hours of racing. Will be good to see what happens in the classics with this!! 

Posted

Saw this on Tweeta .... I just shake my head at times  :whistling:

 

José Been ‏@TourDeJose  51m51 minutes ago

Orica tests automatic chain lubers, positioned on down tube. Possible gain: 12 watts (via @cyclingtips)

 

attachicon.gifC2b3-rnXEAAzO2S.jpg

 

A small motor driven pump? Let's see if the tablets pick that up?!

Posted

I just shake my head at times  :whistling:

 

You shake your head? Why?

 

If I could wake up tomorrow with 12 guaranteed guilt free clean extra watts, I would take that deal. This game is one of margins and 12 watts is beeeeg.

Posted

You shake your head? Why?

 

If I could wake up tomorrow with 12 guaranteed guilt free clean extra watts, I would take that deal. This game is one of margins and 12 watts is beeeeg.

 

It is 'beeeg' so you reckon it is possible to get that by merely 'oiling your chain' consistently? i hope it does for you .....

Posted

It is 'beeeg' so you reckon it is possible to get that by merely 'oiling your chain' consistently? i hope it does for you .....

 

Just trying to understand your comment - do you not believe it's possible to 'gain' (ie presumably reduce loss by 12 watts under defined conditions), through lubrication?

Posted

Just trying to understand your comment - do you not believe it's possible to 'gain' (ie presumably reduce loss by 12 watts under defined conditions), through lubrication?

 

I am sceptical ..... perhaps compared to a completely unlubed dry drivetrain and even then I'm not convinced ... how many people ride without lube?

Posted

Just trying to understand your comment - do you not believe it's possible to 'gain' (ie presumably reduce loss by 12 watts under defined conditions), through lubrication?

 

Lets say you do save 12w of effort through friction loss, what gets lost in terms of aerodynamics, weight etc.?

 

Any object on the downtube will be subjected to turbulent air, which can cause a loss in speed or power

 

It might work, but it probably won't be any better than what is currently available

Posted

I am sceptical ..... perhaps compared to a completely unlubed dry drivetrain and even then I'm not convinced ... how many people ride without lube?

 

Sceptical is good. So am I. So I did a quick google. A number of 'studies' available which make interesting reading.  

 

As ever a claim of an absolute saving ie 12 Watts, would need to taken in context....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout