Jump to content

CSA introduces National Road Cycling Series


DroppedRider

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The idea is great, and if run correctly could work. 
 

Unfortunately CSA has a very bad reputation with the average cyclist, hence so few comments are showing excitement, Ans rather think it as a money grabbing scam. I think a little bit of effort if convincing the masses that they are actually here not only to make money, put to promote the sport in every aspect and get more people to ride. And this can only be achieved with the right management. 
 

My invoice is in the mail for this insight, thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only possible to do 4 out of the 6 events. If it's your best 4 that count then this venture is likely dead in the water. If it's your best 3 that count then some JHB based riders will go do the Free State Challenge and the remaining 5 events will likely just have their normal participants that they would have had regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/21/2023 at 4:07 PM, Ozzie NL said:

 and their only aim is to generate funds to pay their own salaries .... Cleary Stay Away

Wait, what? We get paid? I'll have to go and talk to Ciska and Qondisa about this! I have not seen a single sent of payment!!! I thought everything was voluntary and our own time and expense? After working a full-time job and training and kids etc. etc. etc, just like everyone else?

Ozzie - you seem to be clued up with these matters: please give me a breakdown of the salaries paid to every CSA member so I can have a leg to stand on when I confront the team. I've been there for 5 years and I haven't seen a single cent. Zip, nada, zilch, efokoli, niks, aziko...

Edited by sias
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, sias said:

Wait, what? We get paid? I'll have to go and talk to Ciska and Qondisa about this! I have not seen a single sent of payment!!! I thought everything was voluntary and our own time and expense? After working a full-time job and training and kids etc. etc. etc, just like everyone else?

Ozzie - you seem to be clued up with these matters: please give me a breakdown of the salaries paid to every CSA member so I can have a leg to stand on when I confront the team. I've been there for 5 years and I haven't seen a single cent. Zip, nada, zilch, efokoli, niks, aziko...

Well.
The financials were published previously and we had an opportunity to see what goes where.
This is no longer the case and the thought of "cloak and dagger" comes to mind.
But maybe that is just me, living in South Africa, expecting the worse.

Edited by Spinnekop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spinnekop said:

Well.
The financials were published previously and we had an opportunity to see what goes where.
This is no longer the case and the thought of "cloak and dagger" comes to mind.
But maybe that is just me, living in South Africa, expecting the worse.

I should have used the sarcasm font. 90% of us do this 100% voluntarily on our own free time and expenses. The executive and some office staff in Capetown do get paid as in any National organization. My province has suggested I get paid a stipend per month which I refused as we cannot afford it. So yeah, no-one is getting rich by working for CSA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys were going of the topic here - we have announced a pilot road series of 6 races and we want to make it work - we have identified races and those EOs agreed to work with us.

We will publish the rules soon.

But please share ideas. Lets keep talking about how we make it work for all of us.

---------------------------------------------------

Which categories should be in the series?

Teams: elite/u23 men, elit/u23 women (apparantly we should not call the ladies), vets per age group

Individuals: Juniors, Elites/U23 men, women, Vet A, B, C and D men and women

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sias said:

I should have used the sarcasm font. 90% of us do this 100% voluntarily on our own free time and expenses. The executive and some office staff in Capetown do get paid as in any National organization. My province has suggested I get paid a stipend per month which I refused as we cannot afford it. So yeah, no-one is getting rich by working for CSA.

Dont doubt you.
I doubt the organization.

No one says you, or anyone is getting anything.
But someone is.  Millions.  
With ZERO visibility.

Show us that statements.  Easy.  Visible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zeffer said:

Guys were going of the topic here - we have announced a pilot road series of 6 races and we want to make it work - we have identified races and those EOs agreed to work with us.

We will publish the rules soon.

But please share ideas. Lets keep talking about how we make it work for all of us.

---------------------------------------------------

Which categories should be in the series?

Teams: elite/u23 men, elit/u23 women (apparantly we should not call the ladies), vets per age group

Individuals: Juniors, Elites/U23 men, women, Vet A, B, C and D men and women

 

How will seeding work?

Or is it "I pay CSA money for a license and get auto seeding because I am old" type events?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts that comes to mind regarding this is! Don't really care about anything where CSA is involved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of seeding, races should be obliged to submit race results to a central database, for every event/timing company to use, and not be done by each individual organization. 

Also have a permanent number for the year, and you race in the same category for the year. To get promoted to a higher category, you have to earn a certain number of points. 

Now I need to look for that beating a dead horse image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zeffer said:

Guys were going of the topic here - we have announced a pilot road series of 6 races and we want to make it work - we have identified races and those EOs agreed to work with us.

We will publish the rules soon.

But please share ideas. Lets keep talking about how we make it work for all of us.

---------------------------------------------------

Which categories should be in the series?

Teams: elite/u23 men, elit/u23 women (apparantly we should not call the ladies), vets per age group

Individuals: Juniors, Elites/U23 men, women, Vet A, B, C and D men and women

 

I gave some ideas in the first post above. Would love if there is a Marketing Agency that can partner with this concept and push this aggressively - USA Crits style advertising on social media 

Financially speaking the A,B,C,D individuals are where the money is at. Look after this lot. Make them feel like Pro's. Get official category rankings so that you can work your way up batches properly.

Been cycling for a few years now. In my first year of cycling I went from D batch to A batch. Great for my ego but I would have liked to have upgraded my seeding slower maybe after at least doing 2 years or 7 or so races so that I would have got more experience. 

On the opposite side because riders are getting seeded so high from one race at Racetec you have Zwift only riders who do not have any group riding skills moving at 45 km/h in a stacked peloton. It's getting dangerous. (side note: I find it hilarious with Zwift riders who smash it up the hills but then get dropped descending because no practise of that indoors)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sias said:

Wait, what? We get paid? I'll have to go and talk to Ciska and Qondisa about this! I have not seen a single sent of payment!!! I thought everything was voluntary and our own time and expense? After working a full-time job and training and kids etc. etc. etc, just like everyone else?

Ozzie - you seem to be clued up with these matters: please give me a breakdown of the salaries paid to every CSA member so I can have a leg to stand on when I confront the team. I've been there for 5 years and I haven't seen a single cent. Zip, nada, zilch, efokoli, niks, aziko...

I think much of this perception comes from the fact that a lot of funds have been mismanaged in the past. Particularly murky around the former MD Mike Bradley, and was stated as much by the organisation itself when he was removed/resigned. There’s a lot of that dead wood around still with strong conflicts of interest. So the reputation damage shouldn’t be underestimated.
Imho I think Ciska Austin had an exceptionally difficult time leading the organisation out of a storm into the black again. The lack of openness and comms though doesn’t really help though, and hurts the efforts of those making the time to volunteer their services. 
 

That aside, I personally am glad to see some efforts and ideas around a national road series. Hope to see it grow beyond a pilot phase and tap into the grassroots talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Zeffer said:

But please share ideas. Lets keep talking about how we make it work for all of us.

  1. A league where best n-out-of-N races counts towards your total only really works where it is generally and reasonably accepted that all riders will endeavour to do all N events. It allows for missing an event or getting a non-result due to unforeseen circumstances. Designing a league with the intention that the participants (almost) never race directly against each other detracts from the value of winning the league.
     
  2. Oudsthoorn is only slightly closer to CPT than Durban is to JHB. Sure, it's in the same province, but it's not an easy or cheap one to work into the schedule, and then you're still only on two races. Durban would be race of choice #4 for a JHB based rider and most would not bother with it since the Free State Challenge is reasonably easy and cheap to attend and fulfills the required 3 races. Presumably the primary idea of the league is to incentivise serious riders and teams to travel to a few out of province races a year. The pilot is however set up so that the one province where teams have funds do not really need to travel. The pilot will thus not give insight into their willingness (ability) to travel, and only to that of CPT riders.
     
  3. Probably too late in the planning for this one, but anyway:
    Another objective of the pilot might be to test whether a league increases hype and participation and carries value for spectators. I would have dropped Durban and included One Tonner in Stellenbosch. Have a separate North league of 3 events and South league of 3 events and all events count towards your total. This would actually give insight into whether a national league in 2024 could work on these fronts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bleedToWin said:
  1. A league where best n-out-of-N races counts towards your total only really works where it is generally and reasonably accepted that all riders will endeavour to do all N events. It allows for missing an event or getting a non-result due to unforeseen circumstances. Designing a league with the intention that the participants (almost) never race directly against each other detracts from the value of winning the league.
     
  2. Oudsthoorn is only slightly closer to CPT than Durban is to JHB. Sure, it's in the same province, but it's not an easy or cheap one to work into the schedule, and then you're still only on two races. Durban would be race of choice #4 for a JHB based rider and most would not bother with it since the Free State Challenge is reasonably easy and cheap to attend and fulfills the required 3 races. Presumably the primary idea of the league is to incentivise serious riders and teams to travel to a few out of province races a year. The pilot is however set up so that the one province where teams have funds do not really need to travel. The pilot will thus not give insight into their willingness (ability) to travel, and only to that of CPT riders.
     
  3. Probably too late in the planning for this one, but anyway:
    Another objective of the pilot might be to test whether a league increases hype and participation and carries value for spectators. I would have dropped Durban and included One Tonner in Stellenbosch. Have a separate North league of 3 events and South league of 3 events and all events count towards your total. This would actually give insight into whether a national league in 2024 could work on these fronts.

 

Detailed, well thought-out reply, well done.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout