Jump to content

Are these worth it?


AuctionLamb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

i am with TitusTi - get the PT and a coach & then a month or two later get the crankset and stem to congratulate yourself for all the 2x20s you have done!

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from a recent stiffness /weigth ratio test:

 

1) FSA K-Force Light MegaExo  0.188

 

2) Campag Record Ultra  0.180

 

3) Stronglight Copact Pulsion 0.161

 

4) SRAM Force GXP  0.152

 

5) Shimano FC-R700  0.141

 

Not sure why one would go for ZIPP with other more extablished brands as above.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CWC had the older FSA k-force Mega cranks on sale at R2500.

 

Totalcycling.com of Comobike.com had the Record ones for R3500 or something like that.

 

Either of these offer better bang for the buck compared to the Zipp cranks imo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

from a recent stiffness /weigth ratio test:

 

1) FSA K-Force Light MegaExo  0.188

 

2) Campag Record Ultra  0.180

 

3) Stronglight Copact Pulsion 0.161

 

4) SRAM Force GXP  0.152

 

5) Shimano FC-R700  0.141

 

Not sure why one would go for ZIPP with other more extablished brands as above.

 

You should print the actual stiffness from the test as well. The FSA dont score nearly as well then. Just because a flea has a power to weight ratio better than me, doesn't mean its going to bench press more than me. Well, maybe it will, but you get the point.

velo2007-06-07 06:09:35

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FSA advert in Pro Cycling or Cycle Sport mag. They make a big deal over their stiffness to weight ration in the ad, and in small print they give the actual stiffness values. I think the Record crank was the stiffest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be on EFBE's website. I saw it in a magazine as part of an FSA advertorial, where they did the marketing trick of manipulating the plots and graphs to make their product look vastly superior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think the Record crank was the stiffest.

 

 

Well, well, well... There you go then...Big%20smile

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You should print the actual stiffness from the test as well. The FSA dont score nearly as well then. Just because a flea has a power to weight ratio better than me' date=' doesn't mean its going to bench press more than me. Well, maybe it will, but you get the point.
[/quote']

 

Don't get your knickers in a twist. That was the weight / stiffness RATIO.

 

Everyone in here seems to think that 20g will make them the next Amrstrong so I printed the weight / stiffness ratio.

 

If anyone wants the stiffness value only let me know..

 

 
gianni2007-06-07 08:26:44
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If anyone wants the stiffness value only let me know..

 

 

 

OK....we are letting you know.......Big%20smile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell does all this mean? I can't bend my crank with my hand therefore it is stiff. Not sure I could bend my crank with my foot either therefore it is still stiff, who cares if there is a difference between 0.8 and 0.81.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.................more typing ! Big%20smile

 

ok

 

1) FSA K-Force Light MegaExo 

 

weight: 503g   stiffness: 94.5 N/MM      Ratio: 0.188

 

2) Campag Record Ultra 

 

weight: 652g   stiffness: 117.1/MM      Ratio: 0.180

 

3) Stronglight Copact Pulsion


weight: 522g   stiffness: 84/MM       Ratio: 0.161

 

4) SRAM Force GXP 

 

weight: 652g   stiffness: 99.1/MM       Ratio: 0.152

 

5) Shimano FC-R700 

 

weight: 765g   stiffness: 107.5/MM      Ratio: 0.141

 

 

Definitely Campag for me when looking at above test...well it's definitely Campag anyway but that's another argument altogether...........
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell does all this mean? I can't bend my crank with my hand therefore it is stiff. Not sure I could bend my crank with my foot either therefore it is still stiff' date=' who cares if there is a difference between 0.8 and 0.81.[/quote']

 

someone asked which are better....so the data shows which are better.

 

I couldn't care less, as I defnitely wouldn't be able to bend the old cranks let alone the carbon ones but the man asked the question, so we're answering it..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this secure you bragging rights on a saturday morning?

 

"Hey John my cranks are 652 grams have a stiffness of 107.5mm and a ratio of 0.141"

 

"Huh?" "Oh my word - hey everyone Bill has stiff cranks can you believe it"

 

MMMM I think I would just slap my mate if he told me this and refuse to ride with him ever again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout