And I'm never going to win one either although SRAM may yet "win" a TDF one day. Still unsure what me winning the TDF has got to do with groupsets but there you have it.... YOu use number of Tour de france wins to differentiate quality of the groupsets.. Well if you're never going to win the tour de france then why does it matter to have parts that have won it??! just admit that you like the bling factor' date=' nothing wrong with that. I have Campy cos it's bling, nice to look at. If Tour def rance wins were a criteria then surely Shimano should get the nod? Pointless harping on about previosu wins by Campy cos they don't even make teh stuff tha won their last TdF any more. Shimano = Performance oriented pragmatists campagnolo = Sultans of Bling SRAM = Early adopter technocrats there you have it.. an even shorter summary[/quote'] Nope, you assumed I used it differentiate quality. My post was in response to a post saying that some texan had won 7 x TDF using shimano. I merely pointed out that prior to that shimano had never won a TDF and that SRAM had yet to win one. I've used both and prefer the smaller Campagnolo shifters, so bling is not the deciding factor for me.
