Eddy Gordo Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 (edited) Ok, I had mechanical disc brakes on my bike for a few years. The only issue I had with it was that when the pad wears, then you need to adjust spacing so that you can have maximum braking power. Other than that it worked, I weigh a 100kg and these managed to stop me. I replaced mine recently because I failed to readjust the spacing and had a fall. Yes the v brake is a much better option Edited May 6, 2011 by Riyadh
Leonard Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 Thats what I have and you wont be dissapointed I have the same setup on my Silverback Mercury1. Works very well and you will not be dissapointed as MTBer wannabee said.
dirtrider Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 What about if you get a decent deal on a bike and it has mech discs? Is it worthwhile, cause to upgrade to hyd discs from mech discs is easier and cheaper than from V's to hyd discs? I mean you already have the correct hubs, discs, mounting for a caliper, and with V's you might need new hubs/wheels/fork, even a frame if the frame is V only? You are so right !! Why would you wanna buy a bike with V-Brakes if you intend to upgrade to Hydro disks at some stage ? I agree that mechanical disk brakes are not very good BUT they still beat those stupid rim brakes by a mile !!
DJR Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 Had Shimano mechanical discs on a hardtail about 6 years ago. They were such a pain in the asre that I sold the stupid bike and bought one with good V-brakes (Avids)that outperformed the mec. discs every time, even in the wet. Have since moved to hydraulic discs and they are far superior to even the best V's.
Rydogg Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 Obviously hydraulic disk brakes are better, but Ive always believed that they are just "very-nice-to-haves" on a mountain bike. They make it much easier and nicer to brake. But your brakes aren't usually your limiting factor in slowing down. It's more often your tyres on the dirt (in my opinion).
DJG Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 Thats what I have and you wont be dissapointed +1 I just have 180mm CL rotors - works for me!
Baroudeur Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 Also consider Shimano Deore M595. They are the third most powerful disc brake on the market according to the Bikeradar dyno tests.....maybe not the best feel, but powerful! and cheap!
jmaccelari Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 My tuppence: the only place for mechanical disks is on a tandem on the road. They work well there, but off road you can forget it...
jmaccelari Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 (edited) Obviously hydraulic disk brakes are better, but Ive always believed that they are just "very-nice-to-haves" on a mountain bike. They make it much easier and nicer to brake. But your brakes aren't usually your limiting factor in slowing down. It's more often your tyres on the dirt (in my opinion).I disagree. Disks "bite" properly and do not fade in wet and mud. IMHO: they are a hell of a lot safer... I am glad you highlighted the "usually". It's not the "usually" bits I rely on my disks for. It's the"unusual" ones... Edited May 8, 2011 by jmaccelari
Longbarn Killer Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 Ok............so everybody agrees mechanical discs are rubbish, but what is it that they do or don't do that makes them rubbish?
jmaccelari Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 Ok............so everybody agrees mechanical discs are rubbish, but what is it that they do or don't do that makes them rubbish?The cables clog up with mud. That's why they're good on tandems. You don't see much mud on the roads... Except in Johannesburg.
Caerus Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 Obviously hydraulic disk brakes are better, but Ive always believed that they are just "very-nice-to-haves" on a mountain bike. They make it much easier and nicer to brake. But your brakes aren't usually your limiting factor in slowing down. It's more often your tyres on the dirt (in my opinion). Those "nice to have" brakes can be the difference between hitting a tree or not. I would rather not hit a tree at 40km/h I would not trust anything else on a MTB
Guest agteros Posted May 8, 2011 Posted May 8, 2011 Ok............so everybody agrees mechanical discs are rubbish, but what is it that they do or don't do that makes them rubbish? Try going down the top section of Sani pass with mechanical disk brakes! It will convert you to hydraulic disks immediately
divernick Posted May 13, 2011 Author Posted May 13, 2011 Here's an interesting take from another forum.... http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=707458 Most guys say that although hydraulics are better in general, many appreciate the simplicity, reliability and adjustability of BB7's. Decisions decisions..........
Grebel Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 When not if you buy hydraulic brakes, make sure that they are the dual piston items. DON'T buy the single piston ones because they are cheaper. You WILL be sorry! I hade some Hayes So1e with the single piston calipers... cr@p pretty much sums them up (still better than mechanicals or v-brakes though). You have to keep adjusting them when the pad wears.
divernick Posted July 31, 2011 Author Posted July 31, 2011 I made what I think was a good decision and bought SLX brakes.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now