Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I gotta agree with you Grumps, proving statutory rape 17 years after the event is a non starter.

It's not like I happens in full view of a bunch of witnesses, and if anyone suspected what was going on they would also be in line for failure to report.

Assuming that he was not doff enough to write her letters telling her what a good lay she was, It's going to be he said - she said : great for the Sunday papers but not very profitable for anyone else other than a whole bunch of lawyers.

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

GoG, I was wondering why this is being pursued as civil rather than criminal case. The burden of proof will be as hard in both cases, no?

 

Indeed, the burden of proof will be very difficult, Hense they will try the civil route where you can try and get some money. Or that's how I see it anyway.

 

I must respectfully disagree. As one that was sexually abused as a child, I can testify to how one can repress memories, emotions, which process changes your behaviour without an understanding of why you are a certain way.

 

Okay, fair enough, I am sorry to hear that and I see it as a very sad inditement on our society that the weakest of us are persecuted in that manner.

 

......... but here, to be fair, apart from the rape issue, I dont see the rest as been illegal.

Posted

GoG, I was wondering why this is being pursued as civil rather than criminal case. The burden of proof will be as hard in both cases, no?

Is it not (in layman's terms) a case of balance of probabilities vs beyond reasonable doubt?

Posted

Where were her parents during this? If my daughter has to befriend a man twice her age, I would have put a stop to it, whether 14 or 17, the relationship should not have begun.

Posted

Thats funny.

 

Mine are kept in two of my wife's handbags...she keeps them seperately so they cant play ith each other. :thumbdown:

 

Mine ARE my wife's handbags - its amazing what you can fit into them on a warm day

Posted (edited)

I am pleased to read she says "Its not about the money" because she is unlikely to get much, if any.!

 

Were she in the USA she would likely get $30 million never mind R3 million, even if she lost the case, but here in good old South Africa our courts place very little value on pain and suffering. I doubt she will get much, if anything.

 

Anyway, she makes really only one serious allegation, sex at 14 even if it was consensual is still Statutory Rape in SA, although I dont know how she intends proving this. The other allegations are irrelevant in my mind, isolating her from her friends etc, although its probable it had a detrimental effect on her, unless he forceably kept her away, its not illegal, its great "fluff" for the media and to "plump" her case, but I cant see the courts reading much into it.

 

Sometimes, I also wonder, all this went on what 15 odd years ago, her life is a mess because of decisions she freely made so lets sue someone and lay all the blame on them for my issues.

 

Dont get me wrong, Statutory rape is a serious offence and if he is guilty, then he must face the music, but I cant help feeling the rest is just a way to hopefully increase her bank balance, it seldom takes so long to realize you have issues.

 

 

Dominique Strauss-Kahn

....he was also innocent? No?

 

 

"it seldom takes so long to realize you have issues."

 

You state this from what level of expertise?

Edited by The Drongo
Posted

I see your point.

 

But a publicly elected figure is different.

If this guy was just a 'cyclist' then they wouldn't have bothered to bring the sport into it. What if (by the name that is being bandied about up here, and by the long-term reputation of this 'gent') we are be dealing with somebody who was an elected official within the sport over at least some of this period. Then, is his involvement in cycling relevant to the story?

Posted

Where were her parents during this? If my daughter has to befriend a man twice her age, I would have put a stop to it, whether 14 or 17, the relationship should not have begun.

 

Sometimes you don't have to 'befriend' your abuser if they are in a position of authority, such as say for arguments sake, your coach or team manager.

Posted

GoG, I was wondering why this is being pursued as civil rather than criminal case. The burden of proof will be as hard in both cases, no?

No. In a criminal case the state has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. In a civil case, the onus of proof is on a balance of probabilities.

Posted

Sometimes you don't have to 'befriend' your abuser if they are in a position of authority, such as say for arguments sake, your coach or team manager.

 

You should try it when it's one of your parents. That's a day at the beach, let me tell you.

Posted

Where were her parents during this? If my daughter has to befriend a man twice her age, I would have put a stop to it, whether 14 or 17, the relationship should not have begun.

 

Yeah, agreed, at 14, .......that would be (almost) every parents nightmare.!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout