Jump to content

Lance Armstrong Banned and Stripped of TDF Titles


101SCC

Recommended Posts

In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… :whistling:

Bwah ha ha :w00t: , thats a post of the year for me right there :clap:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… :whistling:

You are such a Tjop!!! :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that Lance has made a decision that has surprised everyone, but it is a good one... it is almost sooo obvious - i never saw it coming!

 

USADA are in no-mans land fighting a fight that they are not involved in.

 

There is no way that he can be stripped of anything by USADA its not theirs to take away... he is not guilty!... and if they do try to strip him of his UCI titles... UCI will defend their jurisdiction and then its gonna be messy and at a huuugh cost to USA tax payers... and then I guess USADA will be dismantled... haha.

 

its gonna be great!

 

Go Lance GO!! :clap: :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… :whistling:

 

Very sharp!

:-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides what anyone else here or anywhere on earth says he still one 7 times in my eyes, if they start a witch hunt where is it to stop. Merckx, LeMond where? Lets test every sample from every race ever using the latest anti doping tests and see who of histories "great" riders were clean. Stupid Stupid Stupid. So if they strip him of his titles are all his "buddies" gonna give back the money they received when Lance won all his tours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2005, LA sued an insurance company to claim and to collect a $5 million insurance-type payout from SCA Promotions for his record-breaking seven wins of the Tour. SCA had alleged that Lance doped in order to achieve his victories and was therefore ineligible to collect the payout.

 

He won, partially because the USADA testified that they were the ultimate US authority on who was or was not a doper and had not found against him.

 

That has now changed, and i suppose SCA will sue for their money back. It will be interesting to see how he defends that. Also, if he testified, he may be guilty of perjury which is a criminal offence.

 

The plot thickens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2005, LA sued an insurance company to claim and to collect a $5 million insurance-type payout from SCA Promotions for his record-breaking seven wins of the Tour. SCA had alleged that Lance doped in order to achieve his victories and was therefore ineligible to collect the payout. He won, partially because the USADA testified that they were the ultimate US authority on who was or was not a doper and had not found against him. That has now changed, and i suppose SCA will sue for their money back. It will be interesting to see how he defends that. Also, if he testified, he may be guilty of perjury which is a criminal offence. The plot thickens

 

The SCA case was the start of it all, but I wonder if double jeopardy will apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure is this has been discussed but here goes. Seeing that cycling is a team sport, should the whole team not be disqualified if one of the members is caught doping? Surely the whole team would have benefitted from the member that doped?

so, any thoughts on this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the titles issue goes on some sort of appeal, Usada can ban him for life from competing in any sport which recognises its authority. The Lance can "Going forward…I am going to devote myself to attempting to be the fittest 40-year old on the planet" who can't compete…

 

Go Tygert! :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so, any thoughts on this?

 

Some sponsors took that stance, and vowed to pull funding should any riders be caught.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some sponsors took that stance, and vowed to pull funding should any riders be caught.

I think I should get/buy/bribe myself a team and feed them some steaks so that I can wheel suck my way to a sub 3 at the argus! Who cares if they are caught doping after the race, my blood will be clean and I will hace my sub 3... :ph34r:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I should get/buy/bribe myself a team and feed them some steaks so that I can wheel suck my way to a sub 3 at the argus! Who cares if they are caught doping after the race, my blood will be clean and I will hace my sub 3... :ph34r:

 

Just make sure you opt for the vegetarian option at the pasta evening… :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout