Caerus Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… Bwah ha ha , thats a post of the year for me right there
Schwynn Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… You are such a Tjop!!!
goya-goya Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 I believe that Lance has made a decision that has surprised everyone, but it is a good one... it is almost sooo obvious - i never saw it coming! USADA are in no-mans land fighting a fight that they are not involved in. There is no way that he can be stripped of anything by USADA its not theirs to take away... he is not guilty!... and if they do try to strip him of his UCI titles... UCI will defend their jurisdiction and then its gonna be messy and at a huuugh cost to USA tax payers... and then I guess USADA will be dismantled... haha. its gonna be great! Go Lance GO!! :clap: TK-Sp3cialiSt and Keithc 2
'Dale Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 In the meantime, you can all start adjusting your finishing place in the 2010 Argus by one… Very sharp!:-D
the nerd Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 Besides what anyone else here or anywhere on earth says he still one 7 times in my eyes, if they start a witch hunt where is it to stop. Merckx, LeMond where? Lets test every sample from every race ever using the latest anti doping tests and see who of histories "great" riders were clean. Stupid Stupid Stupid. So if they strip him of his titles are all his "buddies" gonna give back the money they received when Lance won all his tours? Keithc 1
eddy Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 In 2005, LA sued an insurance company to claim and to collect a $5 million insurance-type payout from SCA Promotions for his record-breaking seven wins of the Tour. SCA had alleged that Lance doped in order to achieve his victories and was therefore ineligible to collect the payout. He won, partially because the USADA testified that they were the ultimate US authority on who was or was not a doper and had not found against him. That has now changed, and i suppose SCA will sue for their money back. It will be interesting to see how he defends that. Also, if he testified, he may be guilty of perjury which is a criminal offence. The plot thickens
Tumbleweed Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 In 2005, LA sued an insurance company to claim and to collect a $5 million insurance-type payout from SCA Promotions for his record-breaking seven wins of the Tour. SCA had alleged that Lance doped in order to achieve his victories and was therefore ineligible to collect the payout. He won, partially because the USADA testified that they were the ultimate US authority on who was or was not a doper and had not found against him. That has now changed, and i suppose SCA will sue for their money back. It will be interesting to see how he defends that. Also, if he testified, he may be guilty of perjury which is a criminal offence. The plot thickens The SCA case was the start of it all, but I wonder if double jeopardy will apply.
canfan Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 Roadies Pfft!Just remember Lance did win some MTB races.
krl747 Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 I will tell my kids he was the best cyclist to ever live! Don't care what who says about wat. They all doped, he was the best doper! Keithc, ADe, Zietso and 1 other 4
Mr SingleTrack Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 Not sure is this has been discussed but here goes. Seeing that cycling is a team sport, should the whole team not be disqualified if one of the members is caught doping? Surely the whole team would have benefitted from the member that doped?so, any thoughts on this?
Tumbleweed Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 Even if the titles issue goes on some sort of appeal, Usada can ban him for life from competing in any sport which recognises its authority. The Lance can "Going forward…I am going to devote myself to attempting to be the fittest 40-year old on the planet" who can't compete… Go Tygert!
Tumbleweed Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 so, any thoughts on this? Some sponsors took that stance, and vowed to pull funding should any riders be caught.
Mr SingleTrack Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 Some sponsors took that stance, and vowed to pull funding should any riders be caught.I think I should get/buy/bribe myself a team and feed them some steaks so that I can wheel suck my way to a sub 3 at the argus! Who cares if they are caught doping after the race, my blood will be clean and I will hace my sub 3...
Tumbleweed Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 I think I should get/buy/bribe myself a team and feed them some steaks so that I can wheel suck my way to a sub 3 at the argus! Who cares if they are caught doping after the race, my blood will be clean and I will hace my sub 3... Just make sure you opt for the vegetarian option at the pasta evening…
Metzet Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 (edited) WADA bunch of IDIOTS !! Edited August 24, 2012 by Metzet
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now