I change lanes without signalling

[Tumbleweed]

who uses hand signals when changing lanes on their bicycles, as required by law ........ oh yes, in case scotty nails me ... every bicycle is required by law to have a ring ring bell, not a bell helmet, which would be great marketing.

 

I would but the law also says your hands have to be on the handlebars at all times…

Edited March 19, 2014 by Tumbleweed

[TheNewGuy]

I just text while on my bike, through traffic, and i myself dont have any number plates on my bike. So yeah, you could say things are getting pretty serious

 

 

[Dragu]

Ha Ha Ha i see this going the same way as "I run red robots" but then this might have been the intention to just stir some emotion

Edited March 19, 2014 by Dragu

[camelman]

I hope you don't look in your blind spot when you change lanes, as that will be illegal.

[dre]

I hope you don't look in your blind spot when you change lanes, as that will be illegal.

 

Yes, but is it immoral? One should be above the law, and be able to decide whether it is going to be more convenient for oneself to change lanes without signalling...

[GoLefty!!]

Were you driving a Beemer? They don't have indicators.

 

 

Or a bakkie / double cab/fortchjuna

[Harryn]

I never indicate when changing lanes on a bicycle. I keep left, so lane changing is not an issue for a cyclist. I only indicate if I turn left or right. I do what makes me feel safe. My, what silly topic.

[Wyatt Earp]

I have a confession.

 

I changed lanes today without signalling.

 

But to be honest, I'm quite sure the people behind me knew what I was going to do? I mean, I looked and I had some space, and I know I should signal, but the last thing I want to do is be considerate and cautious - you know, for my own safety.

 

What do you all think? Am I wrong? Or should we just decide on the application of a law every time we should obey it?

 

Sell the Beemer, other cars come with indicators.

[camelman]

Yes, but is it immoral? One should be above the law, and be able to decide whether it is going to be more convenient for oneself to change lanes without signalling...

It is not immoral, but certainly inconvenient. When looking in my blind spot, I might just strain my neck, thus making it impossible for me to drive and thus holding up traffic with my stationary car.

 

Based on the above I think it is inconvenient to look in it. And there is no solid reasonable argument that will convince me otherwise.

[GoLefty!!]

I farted on my ride this morning. I may have violated the clean air Act at this point. Please don't tell the bunny huggers

Edited March 19, 2014 by GoLefty!!

[nonky]

I have a confession.

 

I changed lanes today without signalling.

 

But to be honest, I'm quite sure the people behind me knew what I was going to do? I mean, I looked and I had some space, and I know I should signal, but the last thing I want to do is be considerate and cautious - you know, for my own safety.

 

What do you all think? Am I wrong? Or should we just decide on the application of a law every time we should obey it?

 

As long as you've been drinking, you should be ok...

[porqui]

This tread is going sideways - at least the other thread was going forward.

[Tumbleweed]

This tread is going sideways - at least the other thread was going forward.

 

To the left or the right?

[DIPSLICK]

This tread is going sideways - at least the other thread was going forward.

:eek: IT WAS SEEMS SLOW BEEEE DIDNT AGREE AND A COUPLE OF UBBERS

 

BUT HEY I NEED ENTERTAINMENT TODAY

[Tubehunter]

Tumbleweed said... To the left or to the right?

 

I feel this is a weak argument as I prefer to go up and down....

[porqui]

To the left or the right?

 

Why do you have to go and make it political!!?