Jump to content

Poll1: Best director  

136 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Director of all time

    • Woody Allen
      1
    • Paul Thomas Anderson
      1
    • Wes Anderson
      5
    • James Cameron
      8
    • Coen Brothers
      7
    • Francis Ford Coppola
      4
    • Walt Disney
      4
    • Clint Eastwood
      16
    • David Fincher
      2
    • Alfred Hitchcock
      4
    • Peter Jackson
      4
    • Stanley Kubrick
      8
    • Akira Kurosawa
      1
    • George Lucas
      10
    • David Lynch
      2
    • Sam Mendes
      0
    • Cristopher Nolan
      11
    • Guy Ritchie
      16
    • Martin Scorsese
      17
    • Ridley Scott
      17
    • M. Night Shyamalan
      2
    • Steven Spielberg
      33
    • Quentin Tarantino
      33
    • Orson Welles
      0
    • Edgar Wright
      1
    • Michael Bay
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

Question:

 

If one sets out to make a documentary, is there a general rule to say X amount of information is to be factual? Who checks it?

 

What I'm getting at, that in film and visual reporting, there is a fair amount of editing that happens, chronological sequence of events that may be taken out of context and skewed to get a certain "message" across (Think, Carte Blanche)

 

I personally don't put too much faith into "true stories", the only "reality" is the one that is observed (think accurate perceptions of events - not the observed photon ) in the Television/Movie Theatre sense.

 

So you're going with the "what is truth?" gambit on a Tuesday afternoon - ballsy and optimistic I'd say.

 

There is no truth, just perceptions.  Point the camera one way, you see one thing, point it the other, you see another.

 

You can make a story from facts but it doesn't make it factual, nor true - depends what facts you use and which you don't.

 

Everything is perception.

 

You film a crowd rioting from the police lines, it looks a lot different to filming it from the crowd.

 

And whatever prejudices you bring to a subject, As the great Simon and Garfunkel once said:  "A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest".

 

Other than that I don't have an opinion on the matter.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Question:

 

If one sets out to make a documentary, is there a general rule to say X amount of information is to be factual? Who checks it?

 

What I'm getting at, that in film and visual reporting, there is a fair amount of editing that happens, chronological sequence of events that may be taken out of context and skewed to get a certain "message" across (Think, Carte Blanche)

 

I personally don't put too much faith into "true stories", the only "reality" is the one that is observed (think accurate perceptions of events - not the observed photon ) in the Television/Movie Theatre sense.

 

Well - take that movie on Sunday...what was true? 4 guys got compromised, 1 guy survived after being saved by some anti taliban people....everything in between was made up and sensationalised....the guy propped up against the tree gasping his last breaths before being shot in the head...the guy dying while looking at some sentimental piece of paper...etc etc

 

conversely...What about Argo? apparently a fairly accurate take on events with the exception of one thing...the final trip to the airport and boarding of the plane was actually a non event in reality and went as smooth as silk...but how boring would the movie have been if depicted like that...I dont mind that

Posted

Seeing as this is a movie thread I can't help myself when I say...

"You can't handle the truth!" ;)

 

and due to this thread, the "out of order" sign on the urinal has me thinking

 

"You're out of order! You're out of order! The whole trial is out of order!"

Posted

Well - take that movie on Sunday...what was true? 4 guys got compromised, 1 guy survived after being saved by some anti taliban people....everything in between was made up and sensationalised....the guy propped up against the tree gasping his last breaths before being shot in the head...the guy dying while looking at some sentimental piece of paper...etc etc

 

conversely...What about Argo? apparently a fairly accurate take on events with the exception of one thing...the final trip to the airport and boarding of the plane was actually a non event in reality and went as smooth as silk...but how boring would the movie have been if depicted like that...I dont mind that

 

Argo was not a fairly accurate take. The Canadians were responsible for most of it, the Americans had a minor supporting role, and they completely downplayed what the Canadians did. 

Posted

Argo was not a fairly accurate take. The Canadians were responsible for most of it, the Americans had a minor supporting role, and they completely downplayed what the Canadians did. 

Oh the shock and horror, Americans acting like they did everything without anyone else... ;)

Posted

Argo was not a fairly accurate take. The Canadians were responsible for most of it, the Americans had a minor supporting role, and they completely downplayed what the Canadians did. 

ok ok - the premise is accurate enough i mean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout