Thug Posted June 30, 2014 Share Haven't seen this being posted or linked. Paul Kimmage interviews Chris Froome with Michelle Cound present. Part 1 http://www.independe...m-30391816.html Part 2 http://www.independe...2-30394950.html Some interesting answers........ Edited June 30, 2014 by Thug Jocklaw and SwissVan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe! Posted June 30, 2014 Share I feel bad for Michelle, getting her interview interrupted by Froome all the time. Squier, straatvark, Thug and 8 others 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryvdM Posted June 30, 2014 Share Long, but interesting read. Thanks for sharing Thug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squier Posted July 1, 2014 Share I feel bad for Michelle, getting her interview interrupted by Froome all the time. Post of the day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted July 1, 2014 Share You know it's an Irish publication when one of the top sports categories on the site is "Greyhounds"! Hahaha! Ta for the links, T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sworks20 Posted July 1, 2014 Share From twitter last night and this sums it up for me: @PelotrainRacing1/2 What amazes me about the Froome interview is that he knows NOTHING about Pro cycling, doping products or practices or anything cont... @PelotrainRacing2/2 remotely close to procedures or his own health. This oke is a poster child for ADHD. Michelle Counds comments, let's not go there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sworks20 Posted July 1, 2014 Share I feel bad for Michelle, getting her interview interrupted by Froome all the time. Give credit to tweeter to tweeted that. Its only fair. carbon29er 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted July 1, 2014 Share Interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang Posted July 1, 2014 Share Good one Thug. Cound was interrupted by both Froome and Kimmage a couple of times, and she interrupted them as well. If I was Froome I would have interrupted her more often I think. Bit of a loose cannon. I look forward to her book in a few years time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe! Posted July 1, 2014 Share Give credit to tweeter to tweeted that. Its only fair.there was a tweet by @froomesarms that said the same ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sworks20 Posted July 1, 2014 Share there was a tweet by @froomesarms that said the same ... That handle is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbon29er Posted July 1, 2014 Share I'm clean is a statement Froome has often made and desperately wants us to believe. When I read this interview 3 things really jump out at me:He is medically not a well person and requires far more drugs weekly than a normal person would. He blurs the line between ethics and rules wherever it suits him, likening taking drugs to eating breakfast The same stuff we heard from LA, only not as consistent in his story, mixing facts and dates constantly which is a huge pointer to them being made up.It certainly seems, by his own admission, that he uses drugs to compete. He just doesn't see them as doping. A bit like Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. E1A104 and rouxtjie 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottCM Posted July 1, 2014 Share Love this part , "PK: Yes, it is totally based on Contador who - and I've said this for a long time - is a cheat. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thug Posted July 1, 2014 Share If you don't follow "**** the hypocrisy" on twitter you should He absolutely laid into Froome/Cound last night and after reading both parts of the interview as well the tweets, a lot of contradictions become apparent. rouxtjie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted July 1, 2014 Share I'm clean is a statement Froome has often made and desperately wants us to believe. When I read this interview 3 things really jump out at me:He is medically not a well person and requires far more drugs weekly than a normal person would. He blurs the line between ethics and rules wherever it suits him, likening taking drugs to eating breakfast The same stuff we heard from LA, only not as consistent in his story, mixing facts and dates constantly which is a huge pointer to them being made up.It certainly seems, by his own admission, that he uses drugs to compete. He just doesn't see them as doping. A bit like Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.Yip....playing the dumb card with her educating him on PED's....pooleaze man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now