fandacious Posted July 10, 2014 Share If someone trusts me enough to tell me that they have doped in the past, I think I'll trust them when they venture an opinion on a rider they believe is clean. david georges wife didn't know he was doping. I wouldn't put much faith in some ex pro cyclists opinion of a current rider... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted July 10, 2014 Share The beer doping is strong with this one! Hahahaha! Love that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted July 10, 2014 Share No, it doesn't negate it at all. Was I recording the conversations? Did I make notes? No. Think burden of proof. Wasn't Lance banned based only on testimony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted July 10, 2014 Share david georges wife didn't know he was doping. I wouldn't put much faith in some ex pro cyclists opinion of a current rider... Bad comparison. I do know that these guys were doping. Different scenario altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted July 10, 2014 Share Wasn't Lance banned based only on testimony? Sworn testimony. And the fact that he refused to put up a defence. It's a "no contest" scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Dassie Posted July 10, 2014 Share Wasn't Lance banned based only on testimony? http://d3epuodzu3wuis.cloudfront.net/ReasonedDecision.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fandacious Posted July 10, 2014 Share http://d3epuodzu3wui...nedDecision.pdf I actually read that entire thing once... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Dassie Posted July 10, 2014 Share I actually read that entire thing once... Ditto, the 60pg summary was a fair bit lighter reading. Still gave me a headache. TALUS and fandacious 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted July 10, 2014 Share Sworn testimony. And the fact that he refused to put up a defence. It's a "no contest" scenario.So take what you have, write it down, go to the cop shop get is certified, and post it SAIDS...? Let them take it from there... Robo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Sol Posted July 10, 2014 Share USN website suggests how they stand on contaminated supplements. It does happen and basically the teams they sponsor and individuals they endorse, the product comes out of a very specific factory. Im assuming tighter controls and QC. For example to manufacture a hydration drink uses a large variety of raw materials. More than likely from a variety of suppliers from all over the world. It seams quiet possable mistakes happen. How sure are you that you do actually get that 24g of protein or what the container suggests. I recon not very often. Wasnt it recently a pro got done for some steroid indication. They found it came from meat he had eaten. Its every where. Mistakes and contamination do happen. Let the investgation run its course. Edited July 10, 2014 by Don Sol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooToo Posted July 11, 2014 Share USN website suggests how they stand on contaminated supplements. It does happen and basically the teams they sponsor and individuals they endorse, the product comes out of a very specific factory. Im assuming tighter controls and QC. For example to manufacture a hydration drink uses a large variety of raw materials. More than likely from a variety of suppliers from all over the world. It seams quiet possable mistakes happen. How sure are you that you do actually get that 24g of protein or what the container suggests. I recon not very often. Wasnt it recently a pro got done for some steroid indication. They found it came from meat he had eaten. Its every where. Mistakes and contamination do happen. Let the investgation run its course. http://www.usn.co.za/page/quality/quality-3.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EZRider Posted July 11, 2014 Share Omerta? Journalist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted July 11, 2014 Share Journalist?Doping-Anti-Hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EZRider Posted July 11, 2014 Share Doping-Anti-Hypocrite. Tumbles is a journalist.Sources might not confide in him if he outed them. Tumbleweed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted July 11, 2014 Share Tumbles is a journalist.Sources might not confide in him if he outed them.So is David Walsh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted July 11, 2014 Share So take what you have, write it down, go to the cop shop get is certified, and post it SAIDS...? Let them take it from there... Would be my word against theirs. The guys I've referred to are friends. Yes, they cheated. That makes them flawed. But so am I. Tumbles is a journalist.Sources might not confide in him if he outed them. Exactly. What I have heard over the years is all off-the-record. It wouldn't be ethical for me to use info I have received to out anyone. dracs, GoLefty!!, HappyMartin and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts