Jump to content

Midrange vs Expensive shoes


Zorro5614

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys

 

Just a quick question regarding shoes and the effect they have on your cycling.  I am currently riding midrange shoes (R1800-R2000), Giro Savix (Road) and Giro Cylinder (MTB).  These shoes are very comfortable and there is now issues riding longer distances

 

Will one be able to feel a difference going to R4000+ shoes with very stiff carbon soles?  Are these soles going to make a noticeable difference to power transfer?  Will one notice stronger pedaling on a Spez shoe for carbon sole with a 13 rating on their index? 

 

Both my current shoes have Nylon injected soles 

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I can feel the difference on the road between carbon and Nylon injected soles, I am not sure how much it affects the power though. 

 

Go for which ever are comfortable. 

 

I picked up some great carbon sole shoes on the bikehub for the price of cheap shoes.

Posted

Yeah carbon soles are a big difference, as well as how the shoe holds its shape. Last little thing is the closure system, cheaper shoes normally just have velcro, but ratchets or boa dials are far superior and allow quicj adjustment as your foot changes over a ride.

Posted

I use my old Giro shoes on the gravel grinder but missing my Shimano carbon S-phyres.

The minimal flex from the carbon just feels better especially out of the saddle when climbing.

They not easy/comfy to walk in... ;)

As mentioned above, the closing system also makes a big difference.

The BOA dials just makes the shoe "hug" around the shape of your feet much better that velcro.

Best bet, try them on before you buy

Posted

Yeah carbon soles are a big difference, as well as how the shoe holds its shape. Last little thing is the closure system, cheaper shoes normally just have velcro, but ratchets or boa dials are far superior and allow quicj adjustment as your foot changes over a ride.

Let’s not forget about laces as well. I have a set with boa’s which I love but I always just seem to go back to my laces pair. And they look better for me that is.

Posted

For road shoes carbon soles are great, nice and stiff, for mountainbike the "plastic" soles are much more comfy, specially if you have to walk some gradients, the carbon soles gives me knee pain on the rough mountainbike trials, too many direct hits on the knees. I have weak knees

Posted

Let’s not forget about laces as well. I have a set with boa’s which I love but I always just seem to go back to my laces pair. And they look better for me that is.

Will definitely be between BOA and laces

 

All the nice lace options seem to be Giro, but I also like the BOA options from Shimano and Specialized

Posted

Let’s not forget about laces as well. I have a set with boa’s which I love but I always just seem to go back to my laces pair. And they look better for me that is.

I might have a bit of a shoe fetish.........little bit..........

 

Your more expensive shoes tend to be lighter and less "bulky" ie. on the top and cushioning.  

As with flex......as mentioned, a little bit difference can be felt on the road.

 

Maybe have a better look at the closure systems rather than the sole.  Love my boas and love the laces (both Giro)

Posted

Gotta be comfortable!! I has S Works MTB shoes and they just didn't work for me...never got comfortable.

 

"Down graded" to the Spez Expert XC shoe. Couldn't feel any difference in putting down power but they were a hell of a lot more comfortable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout