JohanDiv Posted November 30, 2020 Share There are also concepts like this. No chain and very efficient, but I think they still need to sort out the shifting. That thing will need something like a car clutch where you would have to stop pedaling, disengage, shift, re-engage.. or a very complicated(propbably unfeasible) ramp system to shift properly. Don't think it will ever get past prototype phase. Edited November 30, 2020 by JohanDiv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoG Posted November 30, 2020 Share It actually does shift now: Edited November 30, 2020 by Theog MrJacques and Vetplant 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dev null Posted November 30, 2020 Share That thing will need something like a car clutch where you would have to stop pedaling, disengage, shift, re-engage.. or a very complicated(propbably unfeasible) ramp system to shift properly. Don't think it will ever get past prototype phase. Can only imagine what will happen when mud gets into those small bearings. Great idea, but lots of precision required in manufacturing. Which equates to very expensive. TheoG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewbacca Posted November 30, 2020 Share It's also an entire bike, not parts that go onto a bike. So it is, in fact, the very thing the OP's article is complaining about! hahaha It would be a new standard, specific to one brand, which goes against trying to make things interchangeable and 'standard'. TheoG and Patchelicious 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJacques Posted November 30, 2020 Share Can only imagine what will happen when mud gets into those small bearings. Great idea, but lots of precision required in manufacturing. Which equates to very expensive. It could probably be housed inside a sealed cover. To be honest I don't think it will become mainstream, but in places like track cycling where those marginals gains may help it could be useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoG Posted November 30, 2020 Share It could probably be housed inside a sealed cover. To be honest I don't think it will become mainstream, but in places like track cycling where those marginals gains may help it could be useful. Agree, track and maybe TT also. MrJacques 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJacques Posted December 1, 2020 Share Agree 100% person. Some people just feel the need to shove their ***** down other peoples throats when it comes to personal preference. Don't be that guy. Keep it in your pants. I honestly can't see the claimed benefit going from boost to super boost. Marketing at it's finest. Stiffness Same with 31.8 vs 35 on bars. It's still a bar that you hold onto. Don't tell me that one is stiffer or more responsive to trail chatter etc. I did not notice a difference when I "upgraded". Ps. You have great taste in moto! I see a Vitpilen 701 in my future for commuting and some weekend fun. https://www.vitalmtb.com/features/35mm-Carbon-Handlebars-Flex-Tested-amp-More-Vital-Gear-Show,2801 I think I've read of people going back to 31.8 because the 35mm is less forgiving. TheoG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR ◣◢ Posted December 1, 2020 Share https://www.vitalmtb.com/features/35mm-Carbon-Handlebars-Flex-Tested-amp-More-Vital-Gear-Show,2801 I think I've read of people going back to 31.8 because the 35mm is less forgiving. So have I. My 35mm OneUp bars came with the claimed special design to reduce trail rattle and maybe it does work because they feel the same as what my 31.8mm bars did. So maybe the marketing hype worked. TheoG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJacques Posted December 4, 2020 Share I see Rockshox changed the tool required to open a fork top cap. I got upset, now I can't use my hex socket Then I read that it's a cassette lock-ring remover and I have one of those I think this may be a change for the better, most hex sockets are chamfered and not the right kind for use on fork top caps unless you grind them down to remove the chamfer. TheoG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisF Posted December 4, 2020 Share I see Rockshox changed the tool required to open a fork top cap. I got upset, now I can't use my hex socket Then I read that it's a cassette lock-ring remover and I have one of those I think this may be a change for the better, most hex sockets are chamfered and not the right kind for use on fork top caps unless you grind them down to remove the chamfer. Like this .... Grind it flat .... I used the cordless drill to slowly turn the socket while grinding it flat, ensuring a nice level removal Flat, but with a nasty burr ... Now sand it down nicely .... And you have your own custom socket ... The "nut" is just to flat to use a standard socket Edited December 4, 2020 by ChrisF MrJacques, TheoG and Hairy 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJacques Posted December 16, 2020 Share I think whoever designed my bike tried to have as many different Allen key sizes on there as possible. Would be much more convenient if most of the heads were the same size. TheoG and Sid the Sloth 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now