Jump to content

Pinion gearbox system ?


robsc

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/domahidy-designs-27-5-pinion-hardtail-46475/

 

Anybody care to explain this in layman terms . I see a chainring connected to a "sprocket" at the back . Surely one pedal revolution equates to so many millimeters of forward movement , how would the "gearbox" have any effect ? as it looks like the crankarms are connected directly to the chainwheel ?

 

The cranks turn a shaft inside gearbox and inside chainring, then a shaft turns the outside chainring. 

Posted

http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/domahidy-designs-27-5-pinion-hardtail-46475/

 

Anybody care to explain this in layman terms . I see a chainring connected to a "sprocket" at the back . Surely one pedal revolution equates to so many millimeters of forward movement , how would the "gearbox" have any effect ? as it looks like the crankarms are connected directly to the chainwheel ?

One pedal revolution on a regular bike equates to one rotation of the (front) chainring because they rotate as one. But in this case a one pedal revolution does NOT necessarily equal one (front) chainring revolution - because there is a gearing system in the bottom bracket. I've only skim-read but it appears to be directly coupled with the pedals. So one pedal revolution could, say, result in the front chainring rotating twice. And twice for the rear too if those 2 rings are the same. 

 

It's very hard to not call this revolutionary. Or out of the box. Let's call it a potential game-changer. 

Posted

Now take that thing and fit a Rohloff speedhub at the back.  :devil:  :devil:

 

The one hand controls the front gearbox and the other the back gearbox.

18 gear options front

http://14761-presscdn-0-15.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Eurobike_Pinion_2015_KlausKneist__KKM8117-780x520.jpg

 

 

 

and 14 gear options at the back.  

 

http://www.cyclingabout.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Rohloff-Exploded.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

It could be either totally cool or " deurmekaar soos k*ts in a tuimeldroer." 

Posted

Thanks everybody . I see on close inspection that the crank and chainwheel are on 2 different spindles , makes perfect sense now 

Posted

I wonder how much torque/wattage is lost in the gearbox . Would be interesting to see a measurement at pedal and then at chainwheel ?

Posted

I wonder how much torque/wattage is lost in the gearbox . Would be interesting to see a measurement at pedal and then at chainwheel ?

 

The current design that we all use will persist because it is so efficient. Even if this loses as little as 10 W, then riders will not want to race it. Like riding with the brake pads touching, it doesn't loose many watts but you still feel it.

Posted

great for commuting bikes .... .just too expensive for a commuter bike

great for a touring bike going out into no mans land for long periods of time ... might just be "safer" then using a chain vs belt drive.

the time of the internal gear drive bike will still certainly come.....when, not sure.

Posted

Now take that thing and fit a Rohloff speedhub at the back.  :devil:  :devil:

 

The one hand controls the front gearbox and the other the back gearbox.

18 gear options front

http://14761-presscdn-0-15.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Eurobike_Pinion_2015_KlausKneist__KKM8117-780x520.jpg

 

 

 

and 14 gear options at the back.  

 

http://www.cyclingabout.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Rohloff-Exploded.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

It could be either totally cool or " deurmekaar soos k*ts in a tuimeldroer." 

 

So you'll be able to ride at anywhere from 1km/h to 160 at the same cadence, but you'll need a forklift to pick your bike up. Your last sentence pretty much sums it up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout